Comparative efficacy of postoperative adjuvant transcatheter arterial chemoembolization and hepatic artery infusion chemotherapy in patients with BCLC stage 0-B hepatocellular carcinoma at high risk of recurrence following radical resection.

IF 4.8 2区 医学 Q1 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
Frontiers in Pharmacology Pub Date : 2025-09-19 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.3389/fphar.2025.1657794
Xu Feng, Yupei Ao, Jiarui Liu, Jue Yuan, Zhengrong Shi, Chengjia Tang
{"title":"Comparative efficacy of postoperative adjuvant transcatheter arterial chemoembolization and hepatic artery infusion chemotherapy in patients with BCLC stage 0-B hepatocellular carcinoma at high risk of recurrence following radical resection.","authors":"Xu Feng, Yupei Ao, Jiarui Liu, Jue Yuan, Zhengrong Shi, Chengjia Tang","doi":"10.3389/fphar.2025.1657794","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>This study aims to compare the efficacy of postoperative adjuvant transcatheter arterial chemoembolization (PA-TACE) and postoperative adjuvant hepatic artery infusion chemotherapy (PA-HAIC) in patients with BCLC Stage 0-B Hepatocellular Carcinoma (HCC) at high risk of recurrence following radical resection.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study retrospectively evaluated HCC patients who underwent radical liver resection (LR) at two clinical centers between 1 January 2018, and 31 December 2024. The recurrence-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS) were compared among three groups: those who received LR alone, PA-TACE, and PA-HAIC. Propensity score matching (PSM) was applied to minimize inter-group differences and further validate the findings.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 609 patients with high-risk recurrence following radical resection of HCC were included in this study. After PSM, both PA-TACE and PA-HAIC significantly improved median RFS (mRFS) and median OS (mOS) compared with LR alone (mRFS for the LR, PA-TACE, and PA-HAIC groups was 16.5 months, 39.0 months, and 46.0 months, respectively; mOS was 54.0 months, 68.0 months, and not reached for PA-HAIC, respectively). Furthermore, patients treated with PA-HAIC achieved superior mRFS as well as higher 1-year, 2-year, and 4-year RFS rates compared with those treated with PA-TACE. Similarly, PA-HAIC was associated with a significantly longer mOS and a higher 4-year OS rate than PA-TACE. In the construction of the RFS nomogram, the C-indexes for the training and validation cohorts were 0.802 and 0.799, respectively, demonstrating good predictive ability.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In HCC patients with high-risk recurrence following radical resection, PA-HAIC significantly improves RFS compared to PA-TACE, but only in patients with MVI, tumor diameter ≥5 cm, or multiple tumors.</p>","PeriodicalId":12491,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Pharmacology","volume":"16 ","pages":"1657794"},"PeriodicalIF":4.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12492446/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Pharmacology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fphar.2025.1657794","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim: This study aims to compare the efficacy of postoperative adjuvant transcatheter arterial chemoembolization (PA-TACE) and postoperative adjuvant hepatic artery infusion chemotherapy (PA-HAIC) in patients with BCLC Stage 0-B Hepatocellular Carcinoma (HCC) at high risk of recurrence following radical resection.

Methods: This study retrospectively evaluated HCC patients who underwent radical liver resection (LR) at two clinical centers between 1 January 2018, and 31 December 2024. The recurrence-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS) were compared among three groups: those who received LR alone, PA-TACE, and PA-HAIC. Propensity score matching (PSM) was applied to minimize inter-group differences and further validate the findings.

Results: A total of 609 patients with high-risk recurrence following radical resection of HCC were included in this study. After PSM, both PA-TACE and PA-HAIC significantly improved median RFS (mRFS) and median OS (mOS) compared with LR alone (mRFS for the LR, PA-TACE, and PA-HAIC groups was 16.5 months, 39.0 months, and 46.0 months, respectively; mOS was 54.0 months, 68.0 months, and not reached for PA-HAIC, respectively). Furthermore, patients treated with PA-HAIC achieved superior mRFS as well as higher 1-year, 2-year, and 4-year RFS rates compared with those treated with PA-TACE. Similarly, PA-HAIC was associated with a significantly longer mOS and a higher 4-year OS rate than PA-TACE. In the construction of the RFS nomogram, the C-indexes for the training and validation cohorts were 0.802 and 0.799, respectively, demonstrating good predictive ability.

Conclusion: In HCC patients with high-risk recurrence following radical resection, PA-HAIC significantly improves RFS compared to PA-TACE, but only in patients with MVI, tumor diameter ≥5 cm, or multiple tumors.

经导管动脉化疗栓塞与肝动脉输注化疗在BCLC 0-B期高复发风险肝癌根治术后的疗效比较
目的:本研究旨在比较术后辅助经导管动脉化疗栓塞(PA-TACE)和术后辅助肝动脉输注化疗(PA-HAIC)对BCLC期0-B期肝癌根治术后复发高危患者的疗效。方法:本研究回顾性评估了2018年1月1日至2024年12月31日期间在两个临床中心接受根治性肝切除术(LR)的HCC患者。比较单独接受LR、PA-TACE和PA-HAIC三组患者的无复发生存期(RFS)和总生存期(OS)。采用倾向评分匹配(PSM)来减少组间差异,进一步验证研究结果。结果:本研究共纳入609例HCC根治术后高危复发患者。PSM后,与单独使用LR相比,PA-TACE和PA-HAIC均显著改善了中位RFS (mRFS)和中位OS (mOS) (LR、PA-TACE和PA-HAIC组的mRFS分别为16.5个月、39.0个月和46.0个月;PA-HAIC组的mOS分别为54.0个月、68.0个月和未达到)。此外,与接受PA-TACE治疗的患者相比,接受PA-HAIC治疗的患者获得了更好的mRFS,以及更高的1年、2年和4年RFS率。同样,与PA-TACE相比,PA-HAIC与更长的mOS和更高的4年OS率相关。在RFS模态图的构建中,训练队列和验证队列的c指数分别为0.802和0.799,具有较好的预测能力。结论:在肝癌根治术后高危复发患者中,PA-HAIC较PA-TACE显著改善RFS,但仅适用于MVI、肿瘤直径≥5cm或多发肿瘤患者。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Frontiers in Pharmacology
Frontiers in Pharmacology PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY-
CiteScore
7.80
自引率
8.90%
发文量
5163
审稿时长
14 weeks
期刊介绍: Frontiers in Pharmacology is a leading journal in its field, publishing rigorously peer-reviewed research across disciplines, including basic and clinical pharmacology, medicinal chemistry, pharmacy and toxicology. Field Chief Editor Heike Wulff at UC Davis is supported by an outstanding Editorial Board of international researchers. This multidisciplinary open-access journal is at the forefront of disseminating and communicating scientific knowledge and impactful discoveries to researchers, academics, clinicians and the public worldwide.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信