Bone tunnel approach for cervical spondylotic radiculopathy with uncovertebral osteophytes.

IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Xin Wang, Tao Hu, Bo Lei, Chaofan Qin, Xiang Tan, Changjun Pi, Mingxin Chen, Qingshuai Yu, Si Cheng, Zhengjian Yan
{"title":"Bone tunnel approach for cervical spondylotic radiculopathy with uncovertebral osteophytes.","authors":"Xin Wang, Tao Hu, Bo Lei, Chaofan Qin, Xiang Tan, Changjun Pi, Mingxin Chen, Qingshuai Yu, Si Cheng, Zhengjian Yan","doi":"10.1007/s00586-025-09400-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study aimed to assess the clinical efficacy of posterior endoscopic surgery using a bone tunnel approach in treating cervical spondylotic radiculopathy (CSR) secondary to uncovertebral osteophytes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>From January 2022 to July 2023, 68 patients diagnosed with cervical osseous foraminal stenosis due to uncovertebral osteophytes and treated with posterior endoscopic surgery through the bone tunnel approach were retrospectively enrolled in this study, with a minimum follow-up period of 1 year. Clinical outcomes were evaluated using the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) for neck and arm pain, Neck Disability Index (NDI), and success rate according to Odom's criteria. Radiological outcomes were assessed by measuring the C2-7 sagittal Cobb angle (SCA), segmental angle (SA), and cervical curvature angle (CA) on the lateral, hyperflexion and hyperextension radiographs.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>All the patients successfully underwent the procedure without severe complications. The mean operative duration was 84.1 ± 24.6 min, with an average hospital stay of 4.4 ± 2.2 days and a mean follow-up time of 14.7 ± 3.1 months. Significant improvements in the NDI and VAS scores were observed postoperatively (p < 0.05). At the final follow-up, the clinical success rate, defined as excellent or good outcomes, was 100% (43 excellent and 25 good outcomes). On lateral radiographs, no statistically significant differences were detected in SCA, CA, and SA measurements at various time points. On hyperextension radiographs, all measurements at the final follow-up were significantly larger than those taken pre- and postoperatively (p < 0.05). On hyperflexion radiographs, all postoperative measurements were significantly smaller than those taken preoperatively and at the final follow-up (p < 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Posterior endoscopic surgery through the bone tunnel approach is a safe and effective route for achieving direct neuroventral bony decompression, demonstrating favorable clinical and radiological outcomes in the treatment of CSR with uncovertebral osteophytes.</p>","PeriodicalId":12323,"journal":{"name":"European Spine Journal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Spine Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-025-09400-z","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: This study aimed to assess the clinical efficacy of posterior endoscopic surgery using a bone tunnel approach in treating cervical spondylotic radiculopathy (CSR) secondary to uncovertebral osteophytes.

Methods: From January 2022 to July 2023, 68 patients diagnosed with cervical osseous foraminal stenosis due to uncovertebral osteophytes and treated with posterior endoscopic surgery through the bone tunnel approach were retrospectively enrolled in this study, with a minimum follow-up period of 1 year. Clinical outcomes were evaluated using the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) for neck and arm pain, Neck Disability Index (NDI), and success rate according to Odom's criteria. Radiological outcomes were assessed by measuring the C2-7 sagittal Cobb angle (SCA), segmental angle (SA), and cervical curvature angle (CA) on the lateral, hyperflexion and hyperextension radiographs.

Results: All the patients successfully underwent the procedure without severe complications. The mean operative duration was 84.1 ± 24.6 min, with an average hospital stay of 4.4 ± 2.2 days and a mean follow-up time of 14.7 ± 3.1 months. Significant improvements in the NDI and VAS scores were observed postoperatively (p < 0.05). At the final follow-up, the clinical success rate, defined as excellent or good outcomes, was 100% (43 excellent and 25 good outcomes). On lateral radiographs, no statistically significant differences were detected in SCA, CA, and SA measurements at various time points. On hyperextension radiographs, all measurements at the final follow-up were significantly larger than those taken pre- and postoperatively (p < 0.05). On hyperflexion radiographs, all postoperative measurements were significantly smaller than those taken preoperatively and at the final follow-up (p < 0.05).

Conclusion: Posterior endoscopic surgery through the bone tunnel approach is a safe and effective route for achieving direct neuroventral bony decompression, demonstrating favorable clinical and radiological outcomes in the treatment of CSR with uncovertebral osteophytes.

骨隧道入路治疗伴有脊柱骨赘的神经根型颈椎病。
目的:本研究旨在评估经骨隧道入路后路内镜手术治疗脊柱根型颈椎病(CSR)继发于脊柱骨赘的临床疗效。方法:自2022年1月至2023年7月,回顾性研究68例经骨隧道入路后路内窥镜手术治疗的因椎体骨赘导致的颈椎骨间孔狭窄患者,随访时间最少1年。临床结果采用视觉模拟量表(VAS)评估颈部和手臂疼痛,颈部残疾指数(NDI)和成功率根据奥多姆的标准。通过测量侧位、过屈和过伸x线片上的C2-7矢状Cobb角(SCA)、节段角(SA)和颈椎曲度角(CA)来评估放射学结果。结果:所有患者均顺利完成手术,无严重并发症。平均手术时间84.1±24.6 min,平均住院时间4.4±2.2 d,平均随访时间14.7±3.1个月。结论:经骨隧道入路后路内镜手术是实现神经腹侧骨直接减压的一种安全有效的途径,在治疗伴有非椎体骨赘的CSR中显示出良好的临床和影像学结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
European Spine Journal
European Spine Journal 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
10.70%
发文量
373
审稿时长
2-4 weeks
期刊介绍: "European Spine Journal" is a publication founded in response to the increasing trend toward specialization in spinal surgery and spinal pathology in general. The Journal is devoted to all spine related disciplines, including functional and surgical anatomy of the spine, biomechanics and pathophysiology, diagnostic procedures, and neurology, surgery and outcomes. The aim of "European Spine Journal" is to support the further development of highly innovative spine treatments including but not restricted to surgery and to provide an integrated and balanced view of diagnostic, research and treatment procedures as well as outcomes that will enhance effective collaboration among specialists worldwide. The “European Spine Journal” also participates in education by means of videos, interactive meetings and the endorsement of educative efforts. Official publication of EUROSPINE, The Spine Society of Europe
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信