Estimated waste generation from 1 million basic metabolic panels: a multisite U.S. study.

IF 3.7 2区 医学 Q1 MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGY
Seema Khattri Bhandari, Kwaku Twum, Erving T Laryea, Yaqing Du, Raeshun T Glover, Rachel G Brackbill, William Butler, Khushbu Patel, Christopher W Farnsworth, Christina C Pierre, Steven W Cotten, Joesph R Wiencek
{"title":"Estimated waste generation from 1 million basic metabolic panels: a multisite U.S. study.","authors":"Seema Khattri Bhandari, Kwaku Twum, Erving T Laryea, Yaqing Du, Raeshun T Glover, Rachel G Brackbill, William Butler, Khushbu Patel, Christopher W Farnsworth, Christina C Pierre, Steven W Cotten, Joesph R Wiencek","doi":"10.1515/cclm-2025-1162","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Clinical laboratory operations consume large amounts of electricity and water and generate considerable quantities of solid waste. In this study, we quantified and compared the estimated solid waste produced from performing one million basic metabolic panels (BMPs) across five major high-throughput chemistry analyzer systems commonly used in the United States. Additionally, we estimated the carbon emissions associated with the electricity and water usage of each analyzer to better understand their environmental impact.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Five academic medical centers each using a different clinical chemistry analyzer system, collected their respective annual vendor purchase data (January 2022-December 2022). Consumables including reagent cartridges, packaging boxes, inserts associated with reagents, calibrators, and QC materials were categorized and weighed separately. Solid waste estimates for one million BMPs were calculated based on institutional testing volumes. Water and electricity usage for the analyzer systems was obtained and estimated CO<sub>2</sub> emissions (CO<sub>2</sub>e) were determined using standard emission factors and calculators.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study found that performing one million BMPs on wet chemistry analyzer platforms, Abbott, Beckman, Roche and Siemens generated 995 kg, 1,274 kg, 579 kg and 489 kg of solid waste respectively while the dry chemistry Ortho system produced 160,593 kg. The majority of waste across all platforms was plastic. Annualized CO<sub>2</sub>e from electricity and water use totaled to 69,665 kg CO<sub>2</sub>e.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Analysis of BMPs generates substantial amounts of solid waste and CO<sub>2</sub>e across major diagnostic platforms. These findings emphasize the urgent need for sustainability strategies in diagnostic laboratories to address their environmental footprint.</p>","PeriodicalId":10390,"journal":{"name":"Clinical chemistry and laboratory medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical chemistry and laboratory medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/cclm-2025-1162","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: Clinical laboratory operations consume large amounts of electricity and water and generate considerable quantities of solid waste. In this study, we quantified and compared the estimated solid waste produced from performing one million basic metabolic panels (BMPs) across five major high-throughput chemistry analyzer systems commonly used in the United States. Additionally, we estimated the carbon emissions associated with the electricity and water usage of each analyzer to better understand their environmental impact.

Methods: Five academic medical centers each using a different clinical chemistry analyzer system, collected their respective annual vendor purchase data (January 2022-December 2022). Consumables including reagent cartridges, packaging boxes, inserts associated with reagents, calibrators, and QC materials were categorized and weighed separately. Solid waste estimates for one million BMPs were calculated based on institutional testing volumes. Water and electricity usage for the analyzer systems was obtained and estimated CO2 emissions (CO2e) were determined using standard emission factors and calculators.

Results: The study found that performing one million BMPs on wet chemistry analyzer platforms, Abbott, Beckman, Roche and Siemens generated 995 kg, 1,274 kg, 579 kg and 489 kg of solid waste respectively while the dry chemistry Ortho system produced 160,593 kg. The majority of waste across all platforms was plastic. Annualized CO2e from electricity and water use totaled to 69,665 kg CO2e.

Conclusions: Analysis of BMPs generates substantial amounts of solid waste and CO2e across major diagnostic platforms. These findings emphasize the urgent need for sustainability strategies in diagnostic laboratories to address their environmental footprint.

估计100万个基本代谢组产生的废物:一项多地点的美国研究。
目的:临床实验室操作消耗大量的电和水,并产生大量的固体废物。在这项研究中,我们量化并比较了在美国常用的五种主要高通量化学分析系统中执行一百万个基本代谢组(BMPs)产生的估计固体废物。此外,我们估计了与每个分析仪的电力和水的使用相关的碳排放量,以更好地了解它们对环境的影响。方法:5个学术医疗中心使用不同的临床化学分析仪系统,收集各自年度供应商采购数据(2022年1月- 2022年12月)。耗材包括试剂盒、包装盒、与试剂相关的插入件、校准器和QC材料分别分类和称重。100万个bmp的固体废物估计值是根据机构测试量计算的。获得了分析系统的用水和用电情况,并使用标准排放因子和计算器确定了估计的二氧化碳排放量(CO2e)。结果:研究发现,在湿化学分析仪平台上执行100万个bmp时,雅培、贝克曼、罗氏和西门子分别产生995 kg、1274 kg、579 kg和489 kg的固体废物,而干化学Ortho系统产生160,593 kg。所有平台上的大部分垃圾都是塑料。每年用电和用水产生的二氧化碳排放量总计为69,665 千克二氧化碳当量。结论:主要诊断平台对bmp的分析产生了大量的固体废物和二氧化碳当量。这些发现强调了诊断实验室迫切需要可持续发展战略来解决其环境足迹问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Clinical chemistry and laboratory medicine
Clinical chemistry and laboratory medicine 医学-医学实验技术
CiteScore
11.30
自引率
16.20%
发文量
306
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine (CCLM) publishes articles on novel teaching and training methods applicable to laboratory medicine. CCLM welcomes contributions on the progress in fundamental and applied research and cutting-edge clinical laboratory medicine. It is one of the leading journals in the field, with an impact factor over 3. CCLM is issued monthly, and it is published in print and electronically. CCLM is the official journal of the European Federation of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine (EFLM) and publishes regularly EFLM recommendations and news. CCLM is the official journal of the National Societies from Austria (ÖGLMKC); Belgium (RBSLM); Germany (DGKL); Hungary (MLDT); Ireland (ACBI); Italy (SIBioC); Portugal (SPML); and Slovenia (SZKK); and it is affiliated to AACB (Australia) and SFBC (France). Topics: - clinical biochemistry - clinical genomics and molecular biology - clinical haematology and coagulation - clinical immunology and autoimmunity - clinical microbiology - drug monitoring and analysis - evaluation of diagnostic biomarkers - disease-oriented topics (cardiovascular disease, cancer diagnostics, diabetes) - new reagents, instrumentation and technologies - new methodologies - reference materials and methods - reference values and decision limits - quality and safety in laboratory medicine - translational laboratory medicine - clinical metrology Follow @cclm_degruyter on Twitter!
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信