Amine Antonin Alam, Nadia Fathallah, Manuel Aubert, Paul Benfredj, Elise Pommaret, Vincent de Parades
{"title":"Does Antibiotic therapy for anal abscess reduce the risk of fistula surgery? A retrospective study.","authors":"Amine Antonin Alam, Nadia Fathallah, Manuel Aubert, Paul Benfredj, Elise Pommaret, Vincent de Parades","doi":"10.1016/j.clinre.2025.102706","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Management of first-time perianal abscesses remains controversial. While the French school of proctology systematically investigates fistulas, other approaches advocate simple incision, given that over 60% of patients do not develop recurrence. The role of post-incision antibiotic therapy is also debated. This study aimed at evaluating our department's approach to managing first perianal abscesses and identifying predictive factors for recurrence.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We retrospectively included all patients presenting in 2019 with a first perianal abscess treated by incision under local anesthesia, with or without antibiotic therapy post-incision. Patients with evident fistulas underwent surgery. Recurrence was defined as a new abscess or purulent opening. The primary outcome was the rate of patients requiring fistula surgery and/or experiencing abscess recurrence; secondary outcomes included identification of recurrence predictors.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among the 336 patients who consulted for an abscess, 109 were included. Among 109 patients (mean age 43 ± 13 years; 74% male), 55 had incision alone, and 54 underwent fistula surgery. The mean follow-up for patients with incision alone was approximately 30 months, during which 18% (10 patients) experienced abscess recurrence. Univariate logistic regression analysis revealed smoking and absence of antibiotic therapy post-incision as predictive of recurrence with (OR 0.44) were predictive of recurrence. Gender, age, BMI, diabetes, Crohn's disease, HIV infection, prior NSAID use, and abscess location were not predictive. Multivariate analysis was not conducted due to insufficient data.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study demonstrates that 41% of patients who underwent incision for a first perianal abscess did not experience recurrence during the follow-up period. Additionally, the administration of antibiotic therapy post-incision was associated with a reduced likelihood of recurrence. However, randomized trials are warranted to validate these findings and specify the optimal antibiotic regimen.</p>","PeriodicalId":10424,"journal":{"name":"Clinics and research in hepatology and gastroenterology","volume":" ","pages":"102706"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinics and research in hepatology and gastroenterology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinre.2025.102706","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Management of first-time perianal abscesses remains controversial. While the French school of proctology systematically investigates fistulas, other approaches advocate simple incision, given that over 60% of patients do not develop recurrence. The role of post-incision antibiotic therapy is also debated. This study aimed at evaluating our department's approach to managing first perianal abscesses and identifying predictive factors for recurrence.
Methods: We retrospectively included all patients presenting in 2019 with a first perianal abscess treated by incision under local anesthesia, with or without antibiotic therapy post-incision. Patients with evident fistulas underwent surgery. Recurrence was defined as a new abscess or purulent opening. The primary outcome was the rate of patients requiring fistula surgery and/or experiencing abscess recurrence; secondary outcomes included identification of recurrence predictors.
Results: Among the 336 patients who consulted for an abscess, 109 were included. Among 109 patients (mean age 43 ± 13 years; 74% male), 55 had incision alone, and 54 underwent fistula surgery. The mean follow-up for patients with incision alone was approximately 30 months, during which 18% (10 patients) experienced abscess recurrence. Univariate logistic regression analysis revealed smoking and absence of antibiotic therapy post-incision as predictive of recurrence with (OR 0.44) were predictive of recurrence. Gender, age, BMI, diabetes, Crohn's disease, HIV infection, prior NSAID use, and abscess location were not predictive. Multivariate analysis was not conducted due to insufficient data.
Conclusion: This study demonstrates that 41% of patients who underwent incision for a first perianal abscess did not experience recurrence during the follow-up period. Additionally, the administration of antibiotic therapy post-incision was associated with a reduced likelihood of recurrence. However, randomized trials are warranted to validate these findings and specify the optimal antibiotic regimen.
期刊介绍:
Clinics and Research in Hepatology and Gastroenterology publishes high-quality original research papers in the field of hepatology and gastroenterology. The editors put the accent on rapid communication of new research and clinical developments and so called "hot topic" issues. Following a clear Editorial line, besides original articles and case reports, each issue features editorials, commentaries and reviews. The journal encourages research and discussion between all those involved in the specialty on an international level. All articles are peer reviewed by international experts, the articles in press are online and indexed in the international databases (Current Contents, Pubmed, Scopus, Science Direct).
Clinics and Research in Hepatology and Gastroenterology is a subscription journal (with optional open access), which allows you to publish your research without any cost to you (unless you proactively chose the open access option). Your article will be available to all researchers around the globe whose institution has a subscription to the journal.