Incidence, Mechanisms of Injury, and Outcomes of Golf Cart-Related Head Trauma: A Single-Center Experience.

IF 0.9 4区 医学 Q3 SURGERY
Victoria Morgan, Luke Bauerle, Noah Nawabi, Thomas Eckert, Rishishankar Suresh, Tyler Vasas, Habib Emil Rafka, Brian Saway, Kaitlyn Boggs, Stephen Kalhorn
{"title":"Incidence, Mechanisms of Injury, and Outcomes of Golf Cart-Related Head Trauma: A Single-Center Experience.","authors":"Victoria Morgan, Luke Bauerle, Noah Nawabi, Thomas Eckert, Rishishankar Suresh, Tyler Vasas, Habib Emil Rafka, Brian Saway, Kaitlyn Boggs, Stephen Kalhorn","doi":"10.1177/00031348251387157","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>BackgroundDespite the reported rise in both golf cart (GC) usage and associated trauma in the United States, epidemiologic data describing their neurological impact is scarce. This study aims to describe the incidence, mechanisms, and outcomes of GC-associated head trauma in patients requiring neurosurgical consultation.MethodsPatients at a single institution admitted for GC-related head trauma requiring neurosurgical consultation between November 2013 and August 2023 were retrospectively analyzed and described.ResultsA total of 97 patients were identified. Most patients presented with Glasgow Coma Score (GCS) on admission of 13 to 15 (93.81%) and modified Rankin scale (mRS) score of 0 to 2 (91.75%). The most common reported mechanism of injury was fall or jump from a moving GC (73.20%) and the most common diagnosis was intracranial hemorrhage (ICH) (57.73%). Five total patients (5.15%) required neurosurgical intervention with only one patient (1.03%) expiring secondary to their trauma. 94.85% of patients (n = 92) were discharged with mRS scores ranging from 0 to 2. Univariate linear regression analyses demonstrated that patient age, presenting GCS, admission mRS score of 3<i>-</i>6, alcohol intoxication, presence of intracranial bleed, and LOC were predictors of hospital LOS. Necessitation of neurosurgical intervention was significantly associated only with admission mRS between 3 and 6.DiscussionGC-related neurotrauma poses a serious yet potentially preventable health concern to drivers and bystanders alike. Policies regarding seatbelt usage and safety measures for GCs continue to vary widely state-to-state and require data to inform decisions. This is the largest study to-date evaluating the incidence, mechanisms, and outcomes of GC-associated neurotrauma.</p>","PeriodicalId":7782,"journal":{"name":"American Surgeon","volume":" ","pages":"31348251387157"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Surgeon","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00031348251387157","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

BackgroundDespite the reported rise in both golf cart (GC) usage and associated trauma in the United States, epidemiologic data describing their neurological impact is scarce. This study aims to describe the incidence, mechanisms, and outcomes of GC-associated head trauma in patients requiring neurosurgical consultation.MethodsPatients at a single institution admitted for GC-related head trauma requiring neurosurgical consultation between November 2013 and August 2023 were retrospectively analyzed and described.ResultsA total of 97 patients were identified. Most patients presented with Glasgow Coma Score (GCS) on admission of 13 to 15 (93.81%) and modified Rankin scale (mRS) score of 0 to 2 (91.75%). The most common reported mechanism of injury was fall or jump from a moving GC (73.20%) and the most common diagnosis was intracranial hemorrhage (ICH) (57.73%). Five total patients (5.15%) required neurosurgical intervention with only one patient (1.03%) expiring secondary to their trauma. 94.85% of patients (n = 92) were discharged with mRS scores ranging from 0 to 2. Univariate linear regression analyses demonstrated that patient age, presenting GCS, admission mRS score of 3-6, alcohol intoxication, presence of intracranial bleed, and LOC were predictors of hospital LOS. Necessitation of neurosurgical intervention was significantly associated only with admission mRS between 3 and 6.DiscussionGC-related neurotrauma poses a serious yet potentially preventable health concern to drivers and bystanders alike. Policies regarding seatbelt usage and safety measures for GCs continue to vary widely state-to-state and require data to inform decisions. This is the largest study to-date evaluating the incidence, mechanisms, and outcomes of GC-associated neurotrauma.

高尔夫球车相关头部创伤的发生率、损伤机制和预后:单中心研究。
背景:在美国,尽管高尔夫球车(GC)的使用和相关创伤的报道有所增加,但描述其神经影响的流行病学数据却很少。本研究旨在描述在需要神经外科会诊的患者中gc相关头部创伤的发生率、机制和结果。方法回顾性分析2013年11月至2023年8月在同一医院因gc相关头部创伤需要神经外科会诊的患者。结果共鉴定出97例患者。大多数患者入院时格拉斯哥昏迷评分(GCS)为13 ~ 15分(93.81%),改良Rankin评分(mRS)为0 ~ 2分(91.75%)。最常见的损伤机制是从移动的GC上坠落或跳起(73.20%),最常见的诊断是颅内出血(ICH)(57.73%)。5例(5.15%)患者需要神经外科干预,仅有1例(1.03%)患者继发于创伤死亡。94.85%的患者(n = 92)出院时mRS评分在0 ~ 2分之间。单变量线性回归分析表明,患者年龄、出现GCS、入院mRS评分3-6分、酒精中毒、颅内出血和LOC是医院LOS的预测因素。神经外科干预的必要性仅与入院mRS在3 - 6之间显著相关。ongc相关的神经创伤对司机和旁观者都是一种严重但有可能预防的健康问题。各州之间关于安全带使用和安全措施的政策仍然存在很大差异,需要数据来为决策提供依据。这是迄今为止规模最大的评估gc相关神经损伤的发生率、机制和结果的研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
American Surgeon
American Surgeon 医学-外科
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
623
期刊介绍: The American Surgeon is a monthly peer-reviewed publication published by the Southeastern Surgical Congress. Its area of concentration is clinical general surgery, as defined by the content areas of the American Board of Surgery: alimentary tract (including bariatric surgery), abdomen and its contents, breast, skin and soft tissue, endocrine system, solid organ transplantation, pediatric surgery, surgical critical care, surgical oncology (including head and neck surgery), trauma and emergency surgery, and vascular surgery.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信