Comparison of the Effects of Intravenous Dexmedetomidine and Remifentanil in Attenuating the Cardiovascular Response to Extubation in Patients Under General Anesthesia: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

IF 1.3 Q2 ANESTHESIOLOGY
Anesthesiology Research and Practice Pub Date : 2025-09-25 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1155/anrp/9949776
Hamidreza Shetabi, Mehrdad Masoudifar, Hossein Mahjobipoor, Faezeh Poorsajad
{"title":"Comparison of the Effects of Intravenous Dexmedetomidine and Remifentanil in Attenuating the Cardiovascular Response to Extubation in Patients Under General Anesthesia: A Randomized Clinical Trial.","authors":"Hamidreza Shetabi, Mehrdad Masoudifar, Hossein Mahjobipoor, Faezeh Poorsajad","doi":"10.1155/anrp/9949776","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background:</b> Considering the importance of hemodynamic stability during tracheal tube removal in patients undergoing surgery with general anesthesia. This study was designed to evaluate and compare the impacts of intravenous dexmedetomidine and remifentanil on mitigating the cardiovascular responses associated with extubation in individuals receiving general anesthesia. <b>Methods:</b> In this clinical study, a cohort of 90 patients scheduled for surgical procedures under general anesthesia was evenly divided into three groups of 30, receiving dexmedetomidine (0.7 μg/kg), remifentanil (0.3 μg/kg), or a placebo of normal saline. Hemodynamic metrics, such as heart rate (HR), systolic blood pressure (SBP), diastolic blood pressure (DBP), and mean arterial pressure (MAP), were assessed at baseline, prior to extubation, and at intervals of 1, 3, 5, and 10 min following extubation. <b>Results:</b> At 1-10 min postextubation, the control group (C) had a higher HR than the dexmedetomidine (D) and remifentanil (R) groups (<i>p</i> < 0.001), there was no difference in HR between the D and R groups (<i>p</i>=0.57). There was a significant difference in SBP between D and C groups (<i>p</i>=0.09) and between D and C groups (<i>p</i>=0.047). No significant differences in DBP were found among the groups (<i>p</i> > 0.0.5). There was a notable difference in MAP changes between Groups D and C (<i>p</i>=0.010), but there were no differences between Groups D and R (<i>p</i>=0.14) and R and C (<i>p</i>=0.84). In addition, the incidence of tachycardia in Group C was significantly higher than that in other groups (<i>p</i> < 0.001). In addition, the incidence of tachycardia in Group C was significantly higher than that in other groups (<i>p</i> < 0.001). <b>Conclusion:</b> Administering dexmedetomidine at a dosage of 0.7 μg/kg enhances hemodynamic stability during extubation and decreases the occurrence of hemodynamic disturbances and coughing when compared to remifentanil at 0.3 μg/kg and the control group. Therefore, it is regarded as the optimal option for alleviating cardiovascular responses during extubation. <b>Trial Registration:</b> Iranian Clinical Trials Registry: IRCT20200825048515N74.</p>","PeriodicalId":7834,"journal":{"name":"Anesthesiology Research and Practice","volume":"2025 ","pages":"9949776"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12490926/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Anesthesiology Research and Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/anrp/9949776","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Considering the importance of hemodynamic stability during tracheal tube removal in patients undergoing surgery with general anesthesia. This study was designed to evaluate and compare the impacts of intravenous dexmedetomidine and remifentanil on mitigating the cardiovascular responses associated with extubation in individuals receiving general anesthesia. Methods: In this clinical study, a cohort of 90 patients scheduled for surgical procedures under general anesthesia was evenly divided into three groups of 30, receiving dexmedetomidine (0.7 μg/kg), remifentanil (0.3 μg/kg), or a placebo of normal saline. Hemodynamic metrics, such as heart rate (HR), systolic blood pressure (SBP), diastolic blood pressure (DBP), and mean arterial pressure (MAP), were assessed at baseline, prior to extubation, and at intervals of 1, 3, 5, and 10 min following extubation. Results: At 1-10 min postextubation, the control group (C) had a higher HR than the dexmedetomidine (D) and remifentanil (R) groups (p < 0.001), there was no difference in HR between the D and R groups (p=0.57). There was a significant difference in SBP between D and C groups (p=0.09) and between D and C groups (p=0.047). No significant differences in DBP were found among the groups (p > 0.0.5). There was a notable difference in MAP changes between Groups D and C (p=0.010), but there were no differences between Groups D and R (p=0.14) and R and C (p=0.84). In addition, the incidence of tachycardia in Group C was significantly higher than that in other groups (p < 0.001). In addition, the incidence of tachycardia in Group C was significantly higher than that in other groups (p < 0.001). Conclusion: Administering dexmedetomidine at a dosage of 0.7 μg/kg enhances hemodynamic stability during extubation and decreases the occurrence of hemodynamic disturbances and coughing when compared to remifentanil at 0.3 μg/kg and the control group. Therefore, it is regarded as the optimal option for alleviating cardiovascular responses during extubation. Trial Registration: Iranian Clinical Trials Registry: IRCT20200825048515N74.

静脉注射右美托咪定和瑞芬太尼降低全麻患者拔管后心血管反应的比较:一项随机临床试验。
背景:考虑全身麻醉下气管插管手术中血流动力学稳定性的重要性。本研究旨在评估和比较静脉注射右美托咪定和瑞芬太尼对减轻全身麻醉患者拔管后心血管反应的影响。方法:在本临床研究中,将90例全麻手术患者平均分为三组,每组30人,分别给予右美托咪定(0.7 μg/kg)、瑞芬太尼(0.3 μg/kg)和生理盐水安慰剂。血流动力学指标,如心率(HR)、收缩压(SBP)、舒张压(DBP)和平均动脉压(MAP),在基线、拔管前和拔管后1、3、5和10分钟的间隔进行评估。结果:拔管后1 ~ 10 min,对照组(C) HR高于右美托咪定(D)和瑞芬太尼(R)组(p < 0.001), D组和R组HR差异无统计学意义(p=0.57)。D组与C组收缩压差异有统计学意义(p=0.09), D组与C组收缩压差异有统计学意义(p=0.047)。各组间DBP差异无统计学意义(p < 0.05)。D组与C组间MAP变化差异有统计学意义(p=0.010), D组与R组间无统计学差异(p=0.14), R组与C组间无统计学差异(p=0.84)。此外,C组心动过速发生率显著高于其他组(p < 0.001)。此外,C组心动过速发生率显著高于其他组(p < 0.001)。结论:与0.3 μg/kg瑞芬太尼和对照组相比,0.7 μg/kg右美托咪定可提高拔管时血流动力学稳定性,减少血流动力学紊乱和咳嗽的发生。因此,它被认为是缓解拔管期间心血管反应的最佳选择。试验注册:伊朗临床试验注册中心:IRCT20200825048515N74。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
29
审稿时长
18 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信