Optimizing International Market Selection: A Dynamic Approach Integrating Export and FDI Entry Modes

IF 3.2 Q3 BUSINESS
Yueling Zhou, Emanuel Gomes, Ferran Vendrell-Herrero
{"title":"Optimizing International Market Selection: A Dynamic Approach Integrating Export and FDI Entry Modes","authors":"Yueling Zhou,&nbsp;Emanuel Gomes,&nbsp;Ferran Vendrell-Herrero","doi":"10.1002/tie.70007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Effectively evaluating and selecting foreign markets is essential for successful internationalization. Traditional International Market Selection (IMS) frameworks typically follow a linear, sequential process: identifying motives, selecting markets, and subsequently determining entry modes. However, such sequential frameworks inadequately account for today's dynamic global market conditions, often resulting in firms entering appropriate markets via an unsuitable entry mode—termed herein as Type III error. Addressing this dangerous error, our study proposes a novel IMS approach that simultaneously integrates market attractiveness and considerations of the suitability of the entry mode selected. Using a dual-criteria ranking method combined with a 45° line analysis, we evaluate 86 prospective international markets across 30 variables. This approach enables firms to align market selection and entry mode decisions from the outset and responds directly to recent research emphasizing their interdependent nature. Our findings reveal that not all markets are analogous, that is, equally attractive for export and FDI, and that some markets are quite distinct, requiring specific entry modes. By adopting this integrated, flexible framework, firms can make more nuanced, strategically coherent internationalization decisions, minimizing risks associated with entry mode misalignment and enhancing their global strategic effectiveness.</p>","PeriodicalId":47515,"journal":{"name":"Thunderbird International Business Review","volume":"67 6","pages":"739-755"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/tie.70007","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Thunderbird International Business Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/tie.70007","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Effectively evaluating and selecting foreign markets is essential for successful internationalization. Traditional International Market Selection (IMS) frameworks typically follow a linear, sequential process: identifying motives, selecting markets, and subsequently determining entry modes. However, such sequential frameworks inadequately account for today's dynamic global market conditions, often resulting in firms entering appropriate markets via an unsuitable entry mode—termed herein as Type III error. Addressing this dangerous error, our study proposes a novel IMS approach that simultaneously integrates market attractiveness and considerations of the suitability of the entry mode selected. Using a dual-criteria ranking method combined with a 45° line analysis, we evaluate 86 prospective international markets across 30 variables. This approach enables firms to align market selection and entry mode decisions from the outset and responds directly to recent research emphasizing their interdependent nature. Our findings reveal that not all markets are analogous, that is, equally attractive for export and FDI, and that some markets are quite distinct, requiring specific entry modes. By adopting this integrated, flexible framework, firms can make more nuanced, strategically coherent internationalization decisions, minimizing risks associated with entry mode misalignment and enhancing their global strategic effectiveness.

Abstract Image

优化国际市场选择:一种整合出口与FDI进入模式的动态方法
有效地评估和选择国外市场是国际化成功的关键。传统的国际市场选择(IMS)框架通常遵循线性的顺序过程:确定动机,选择市场,然后确定进入模式。然而,这种顺序框架不能充分解释当今动态的全球市场状况,往往导致企业通过不合适的进入模式进入合适的市场——本文称之为第三类错误。为了解决这一危险的错误,我们的研究提出了一种新的IMS方法,该方法同时整合了市场吸引力和所选择的进入模式的适用性。采用双标准排名方法结合45°线分析,我们评估了86个潜在的国际市场,涉及30个变量。这种方法使企业能够从一开始就调整市场选择和进入模式决策,并直接回应最近强调它们相互依赖性质的研究。我们的研究结果表明,并非所有的市场都是类似的,即对出口和外国直接投资具有同等的吸引力,而且一些市场非常不同,需要特定的进入模式。通过采用这一综合的、灵活的框架,企业可以做出更细微的、战略上连贯的国际化决策,将与进入模式不一致相关的风险降至最低,并提高其全球战略有效性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
9.10%
发文量
73
期刊介绍: Thunderbird International Business Review is a peer-reviewed journal that is published six times a year in cooperation with the Thunderbird School of Global Business Management, the world"s leading institution in the education of global managers. The journal"s aim is to advance and disseminate research in the field of international business. Its main target audience includes academicians and executives in business and government who have an interest in international business.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信