Tumor and germline testing with next generation sequencing in epithelial ovarian cancer: a prospective paired comparison using an 18-gene panel.

IF 4.5 2区 医学 Q1 Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
Elisabeth Spenard, Cristina Mitric, Melanie Care, Tracy L Stockley, Raymond H Kim, Jeanna McCuaig, Blaise Clarke, Laura Ranich, Clare Sheen, Sarah E Ferguson, Liat Hogen, Taymaa May, Marcus Q Bernardini
{"title":"Tumor and germline testing with next generation sequencing in epithelial ovarian cancer: a prospective paired comparison using an 18-gene panel.","authors":"Elisabeth Spenard, Cristina Mitric, Melanie Care, Tracy L Stockley, Raymond H Kim, Jeanna McCuaig, Blaise Clarke, Laura Ranich, Clare Sheen, Sarah E Ferguson, Liat Hogen, Taymaa May, Marcus Q Bernardini","doi":"10.1002/1878-0261.70136","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Genetic testing in epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) in Ontario includes germline next-generation sequencing (NGS) for 19 genes. Additionally, tumor tissue undergoes reflex NGS testing for BRCA1/2 to assess eligibility for PARPi. Although parallel testing confers advantages, this model duplicates healthcare resources. Here, we prospectively assessed the feasibility of tumor-first multigene testing by comparing tumor tissue with germline testing of peripheral blood. An 18-gene NGS panel was used to test tumor and germline DNA (n = 106 patients). In 26 patients, 27 tumor Tier I or II variants were identified, with 16/27 (59%) being germline pathogenic variants (PV) (13 BRCA1/2; 3 other genes) and 11/27 (41%) somatic variants (9 BRCA1/2; 2 other). In 51/106 patients, there were no tumor variants (excluding TP53), of which one patient had a germline BRCA1 copy number variant deletion in exon 12. Tumor-first testing detected variant-positive and variant-negative germline cases in 105/106 patients (99.1%). Among 50 BRCA-negative patients, 14/50 (28%) were homologous recombination deficiency (HRD)-positive. Therefore, we demonstrate that multigene NGS tumor-testing is effective in identifying germline variants in EOC with a < 1% false-negative rate.</p>","PeriodicalId":18764,"journal":{"name":"Molecular Oncology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Molecular Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/1878-0261.70136","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Genetic testing in epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) in Ontario includes germline next-generation sequencing (NGS) for 19 genes. Additionally, tumor tissue undergoes reflex NGS testing for BRCA1/2 to assess eligibility for PARPi. Although parallel testing confers advantages, this model duplicates healthcare resources. Here, we prospectively assessed the feasibility of tumor-first multigene testing by comparing tumor tissue with germline testing of peripheral blood. An 18-gene NGS panel was used to test tumor and germline DNA (n = 106 patients). In 26 patients, 27 tumor Tier I or II variants were identified, with 16/27 (59%) being germline pathogenic variants (PV) (13 BRCA1/2; 3 other genes) and 11/27 (41%) somatic variants (9 BRCA1/2; 2 other). In 51/106 patients, there were no tumor variants (excluding TP53), of which one patient had a germline BRCA1 copy number variant deletion in exon 12. Tumor-first testing detected variant-positive and variant-negative germline cases in 105/106 patients (99.1%). Among 50 BRCA-negative patients, 14/50 (28%) were homologous recombination deficiency (HRD)-positive. Therefore, we demonstrate that multigene NGS tumor-testing is effective in identifying germline variants in EOC with a < 1% false-negative rate.

肿瘤和生殖系检测与下一代测序在上皮性卵巢癌:使用18基因面板的前瞻性配对比较。
安大略省上皮性卵巢癌(EOC)的基因检测包括19个基因的种系下一代测序(NGS)。此外,肿瘤组织通过反射性NGS检测BRCA1/2来评估PARPi的资格。尽管并行测试具有优势,但该模型会复制医疗保健资源。在这里,我们通过比较肿瘤组织和外周血种系检测来前瞻性地评估肿瘤优先多基因检测的可行性。采用18个基因的NGS组检测肿瘤和种系DNA (n = 106例)。在26例患者中,鉴定出27例肿瘤I级或II级变异,其中16/27(59%)为种系致病变异(PV)(13例BRCA1/2, 3例其他基因)和11/27(41%)为体细胞变异(9例BRCA1/2, 2例其他基因)。51/106例患者未发现肿瘤变异(TP53除外),其中1例患者外显子12有种系BRCA1拷贝数变异缺失。106例患者中有105例(99.1%)在肿瘤首次检测中发现变异阳性和变异阴性的种系病例。在50例brca阴性患者中,14/50(28%)为同源重组缺陷(HRD)阳性。因此,我们证明了多基因NGS肿瘤检测可以有效地识别带有a的EOC的种系变异
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Molecular Oncology
Molecular Oncology Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology-Molecular Medicine
CiteScore
11.80
自引率
1.50%
发文量
203
审稿时长
10 weeks
期刊介绍: Molecular Oncology highlights new discoveries, approaches, and technical developments, in basic, clinical and discovery-driven translational cancer research. It publishes research articles, reviews (by invitation only), and timely science policy articles. The journal is now fully Open Access with all articles published over the past 10 years freely available.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信