Application of Bayesian Borrowing Methods in Clinical Trials for Children with Type II Diabetes Mellitus.

IF 1.9 4区 医学 Q4 MEDICAL INFORMATICS
Roberto Crackel, Yuanyuan Ji, Yoonhee Kim, James Travis, Wenda Tu, Yun Wang, Sunghee Kim, Pablo Bonangelino
{"title":"Application of Bayesian Borrowing Methods in Clinical Trials for Children with Type II Diabetes Mellitus.","authors":"Roberto Crackel, Yuanyuan Ji, Yoonhee Kim, James Travis, Wenda Tu, Yun Wang, Sunghee Kim, Pablo Bonangelino","doi":"10.1007/s43441-025-00874-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Clinical trials for children with type II diabetes mellitus (T2DM) pose challenges often due to recruitment issues. The variability in the treatment effect for pediatrics with T2DM tends to be much larger than that for adults, therefore, a larger pediatric study is needed to independently detect a similar treatment effect. If leveraging adult information to a pediatric population can be appropriately justified, and scientific rational has been given for the relevancy of the adult information, then Bayesian borrowing methods can aid in reducing the number of patients needed for a pediatric study and therefore increase feasibility and efficiency. We introduce Bayesian borrowing methods to obtain scientifically sound and conclusive results with adequate study power in anti-diabetic products development for children with T2DM. To apply Bayesian borrowing methods, it is important to (1) identify the external data that can be leveraged, (2) pre-specify model parameters, (3) assess operating characteristics, and (4) pre-specify weights and the maximum amount of borrowing needed to achieve a study win. To protect against prior-data conflicts that may exist due to differences in T2DM between adults and pediatrics, we select a mixture prior to take an advantage that they adjust the degree of information borrowed based on the similarity between adults and pediatrics. We applied these methods to an anti-diabetic product. In conclusion, the outcomes of our step-by-step demonstration of the application of Bayesian borrowing methods provides a guide on how to pre-specify parameters and considerations that should be made when planning to implement said methods.</p>","PeriodicalId":23084,"journal":{"name":"Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s43441-025-00874-z","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MEDICAL INFORMATICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Clinical trials for children with type II diabetes mellitus (T2DM) pose challenges often due to recruitment issues. The variability in the treatment effect for pediatrics with T2DM tends to be much larger than that for adults, therefore, a larger pediatric study is needed to independently detect a similar treatment effect. If leveraging adult information to a pediatric population can be appropriately justified, and scientific rational has been given for the relevancy of the adult information, then Bayesian borrowing methods can aid in reducing the number of patients needed for a pediatric study and therefore increase feasibility and efficiency. We introduce Bayesian borrowing methods to obtain scientifically sound and conclusive results with adequate study power in anti-diabetic products development for children with T2DM. To apply Bayesian borrowing methods, it is important to (1) identify the external data that can be leveraged, (2) pre-specify model parameters, (3) assess operating characteristics, and (4) pre-specify weights and the maximum amount of borrowing needed to achieve a study win. To protect against prior-data conflicts that may exist due to differences in T2DM between adults and pediatrics, we select a mixture prior to take an advantage that they adjust the degree of information borrowed based on the similarity between adults and pediatrics. We applied these methods to an anti-diabetic product. In conclusion, the outcomes of our step-by-step demonstration of the application of Bayesian borrowing methods provides a guide on how to pre-specify parameters and considerations that should be made when planning to implement said methods.

贝叶斯借用方法在儿童2型糖尿病临床试验中的应用
儿童2型糖尿病(T2DM)的临床试验常常由于招募问题而面临挑战。儿科2型糖尿病治疗效果的可变性往往比成人大得多,因此,需要更大规模的儿科研究来独立检测类似的治疗效果。如果将成人信息运用到儿科人群中能够得到适当的证明,并且对成人信息的相关性给出了科学的理性,那么贝叶斯借用方法可以帮助减少儿科研究所需的患者数量,从而提高可行性和效率。我们引入贝叶斯借鉴方法,在2型糖尿病儿童降糖药的开发中获得科学合理的结论性结果,具有足够的研究能力。要应用贝叶斯借鉴方法,重要的是:(1)识别可以利用的外部数据,(2)预先指定模型参数,(3)评估操作特征,以及(4)预先指定权重和实现研究胜利所需的最大借鉴量。为了防止由于成人和儿科之间的T2DM差异而可能存在的先验数据冲突,我们选择了一个混合数据,以利用它们根据成人和儿科之间的相似性调整信息的程度。我们将这些方法应用于一种抗糖尿病产品。总之,我们逐步演示贝叶斯借用方法应用的结果为如何预先指定参数以及计划实施所述方法时应考虑的事项提供了指导。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science
Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science MEDICAL INFORMATICS-PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
13.30%
发文量
127
期刊介绍: Therapeutic Innovation & Regulatory Science (TIRS) is the official scientific journal of DIA that strives to advance medical product discovery, development, regulation, and use through the publication of peer-reviewed original and review articles, commentaries, and letters to the editor across the spectrum of converting biomedical science into practical solutions to advance human health. The focus areas of the journal are as follows: Biostatistics Clinical Trials Product Development and Innovation Global Perspectives Policy Regulatory Science Product Safety Special Populations
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信