Best Practices Recommendations for Microtransitions in Care-An Emerging Classification of Care Transitions: A Consensus Statement.

IF 3.8 2区 医学 Q2 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY
Benjamin E Canter, Sing T Palat, Kenneth S Boockvar, Barbara Resnick, Jason R Falvey, Beth Fields, Cari Levy, Karl Steinberg, Sandeep Pagali, Isaac O Longobardi, Suzanne M Gillespie, Christian Bergman, Donna Kaba, Allison Villegas, Leslie Eber, Jessica Kalender-Rich, H Edward Davidson, Cecilia Y Cai, Jamyl N Walker, Manisha Parulekar, Paige Hector, Chloe Bomberger, Aval-Na'Ree S Green
{"title":"Best Practices Recommendations for Microtransitions in Care-An Emerging Classification of Care Transitions: A Consensus Statement.","authors":"Benjamin E Canter, Sing T Palat, Kenneth S Boockvar, Barbara Resnick, Jason R Falvey, Beth Fields, Cari Levy, Karl Steinberg, Sandeep Pagali, Isaac O Longobardi, Suzanne M Gillespie, Christian Bergman, Donna Kaba, Allison Villegas, Leslie Eber, Jessica Kalender-Rich, H Edward Davidson, Cecilia Y Cai, Jamyl N Walker, Manisha Parulekar, Paige Hector, Chloe Bomberger, Aval-Na'Ree S Green","doi":"10.1016/j.jamda.2025.105898","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Microtransitions-defined as brief, nonurgent transitions in care-occur in post-acute and long-term care (PALTC) settings (eg, room changes, nonmedical outings, and medical outings). They occur at least as frequently as major transitions (eg, hospitalizations, discharges) and carry similar risks for adverse clinical outcomes if not properly managed. Limited evidence exists to guide safe microtransition coordination. This study aimed to establish best practice recommendations for staff facilitating microtransitions and evaluate the level of feasibility and clinical benefit of these recommendations in PALTC.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Modified Delphi study.</p><p><strong>Setting and participants: </strong>A total of 39 expert panelists.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Initial statements were developed based on a focus group and literature review. Consensus was defined as ≥80% agreement. Over 3 rounds, statements on safely facilitating room changes, recreational trips, and nonurgent (eg, outpatient) medical appointments were evaluated by panelists, then amended based on qualitative survey and focus group feedback until consensus was reached that statements were feasible and clinically beneficial. Five principles of important considerations for successful microtransitions were developed, and recommendations were categorized according to these principles: (1) communication; (2) adverse event monitoring, preparation, and prevention; (3) purpose and destination of transition; (4) equipment and environmental safety; and (5) skill level of the escort.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Fifty-one of the 70 finalized (72.9%) statements reached consensus for feasibility and/or clinical benefit for at least 1 type of microtransition. Of these, 41 of 51 (80.4%) reached consensus for feasibility, 49 of 51 (96.1%) reached consensus for clinical benefit, 39 of 51 (76.5%) statements reached consensus for both feasibility and clinical benefit, and 19 of 70 (27.1%) statements did not reach consensus or were rejected.</p><p><strong>Conclusions and implications: </strong>This is the first study to develop recommendations guiding PALTC staff in facilitating microtransitions. Implementing these recommendations may mitigate adverse event risk, such as falls and emergency departments transfers. Recommendations can guide situation-specific, patient-centered processes in coordinating safe microtransitions.</p>","PeriodicalId":17180,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American Medical Directors Association","volume":" ","pages":"105898"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the American Medical Directors Association","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jamda.2025.105898","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: Microtransitions-defined as brief, nonurgent transitions in care-occur in post-acute and long-term care (PALTC) settings (eg, room changes, nonmedical outings, and medical outings). They occur at least as frequently as major transitions (eg, hospitalizations, discharges) and carry similar risks for adverse clinical outcomes if not properly managed. Limited evidence exists to guide safe microtransition coordination. This study aimed to establish best practice recommendations for staff facilitating microtransitions and evaluate the level of feasibility and clinical benefit of these recommendations in PALTC.

Design: Modified Delphi study.

Setting and participants: A total of 39 expert panelists.

Methods: Initial statements were developed based on a focus group and literature review. Consensus was defined as ≥80% agreement. Over 3 rounds, statements on safely facilitating room changes, recreational trips, and nonurgent (eg, outpatient) medical appointments were evaluated by panelists, then amended based on qualitative survey and focus group feedback until consensus was reached that statements were feasible and clinically beneficial. Five principles of important considerations for successful microtransitions were developed, and recommendations were categorized according to these principles: (1) communication; (2) adverse event monitoring, preparation, and prevention; (3) purpose and destination of transition; (4) equipment and environmental safety; and (5) skill level of the escort.

Results: Fifty-one of the 70 finalized (72.9%) statements reached consensus for feasibility and/or clinical benefit for at least 1 type of microtransition. Of these, 41 of 51 (80.4%) reached consensus for feasibility, 49 of 51 (96.1%) reached consensus for clinical benefit, 39 of 51 (76.5%) statements reached consensus for both feasibility and clinical benefit, and 19 of 70 (27.1%) statements did not reach consensus or were rejected.

Conclusions and implications: This is the first study to develop recommendations guiding PALTC staff in facilitating microtransitions. Implementing these recommendations may mitigate adverse event risk, such as falls and emergency departments transfers. Recommendations can guide situation-specific, patient-centered processes in coordinating safe microtransitions.

护理微转变的最佳实践建议-护理转变的新兴分类:共识声明。
目的:微过渡-定义为在急性和长期护理(PALTC)后发生的短暂的、非紧急的护理过渡(例如,房间更换、非医疗外出和医疗外出)。它们发生的频率至少与重大转变(如住院、出院)一样频繁,如果管理不当,也会带来类似的不良临床结果风险。指导安全微转移协调的证据有限。本研究旨在为促进微转变的工作人员建立最佳实践建议,并评估这些建议在PALTC的可行性和临床效益水平。设计:改进的德尔菲研究。设置及参与者:共有39位专家小组成员。方法:通过焦点小组调查和文献回顾,形成初步陈述。一致定义为≥80%的同意。在3轮以上的时间里,小组成员评估了关于安全方便换房、娱乐旅行和非紧急(如门诊)医疗预约的陈述,然后根据定性调查和焦点小组反馈进行修改,直到达成共识,认为陈述是可行的,并且在临床上是有益的。本文提出了成功微转型的5个重要考虑因素,并根据这些原则对建议进行了分类:(1)沟通;(2)不良事件的监测、准备和预防;(三)转移的目的和目的地;(4)设备和环境安全;(5)陪护人员的技能水平。结果:70份最终报告中有51份(72.9%)对至少1种微转移的可行性和/或临床益处达成共识。51项评价中41项(80.4%)对可行性评价一致,49项(96.1%)对临床获益评价一致,39项(76.5%)对可行性和临床获益评价一致,19项(27.1%)评价不一致或被否决。结论和意义:这是第一个提出指导PALTC工作人员促进微转变的建议的研究。实施这些建议可以减少不良事件的风险,如跌倒和急诊转院。建议可以指导协调安全微转移的具体情况、以患者为中心的过程。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
11.10
自引率
6.60%
发文量
472
审稿时长
44 days
期刊介绍: JAMDA, the official journal of AMDA - The Society for Post-Acute and Long-Term Care Medicine, is a leading peer-reviewed publication that offers practical information and research geared towards healthcare professionals in the post-acute and long-term care fields. It is also a valuable resource for policy-makers, organizational leaders, educators, and advocates. The journal provides essential information for various healthcare professionals such as medical directors, attending physicians, nurses, consultant pharmacists, geriatric psychiatrists, nurse practitioners, physician assistants, physical and occupational therapists, social workers, and others involved in providing, overseeing, and promoting quality
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信