Małgorzata Pieniążek, Marcin Kubeczko, Manuela Las-Jankowska, Anna Polakiewicz-Gilowska, Aleksandra Łacko, Michał Jarząb, Zuzana Bielčiková, Renata Pacholczak-Madej, Miroslawa Püsküllüoğlu
{"title":"Sacituzumab Govitecan initial dose reduction in polish patients with metastatic triple-negative breast cancer: impact on efficacy and safety.","authors":"Małgorzata Pieniążek, Marcin Kubeczko, Manuela Las-Jankowska, Anna Polakiewicz-Gilowska, Aleksandra Łacko, Michał Jarząb, Zuzana Bielčiková, Renata Pacholczak-Madej, Miroslawa Püsküllüoğlu","doi":"10.1007/s00280-025-04823-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Sacituzumab govitecan (SG) is approved for metastatic triple-negative breast cancer in ≥ 2 line setting at 10 mg/kg IV on Days 1 and 8 (21-day cycle). Trials confirmed its superiority over 8 mg/kg with manageable safety. In practice, precautionary dose reductions are used despite no formal guidance. In Poland, fixed 200 mg vials and unreimbursed drug waste lead to early dose adjustments.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective study evaluated the impact of initial SG dose reduction on treatment outcomes and tolerability in Polish patients. Medical records provided data on baseline features, treatment, survival, and safety. Kaplan-Meier and chi-square tests were used for survival and group comparisons. A multivariate Cox model assessed the independent effect of dose reduction on overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS). Significance was set at p < 0.05.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 83 patients (median age 55, range 30-86), initial dose reductions ≥ 10% were observed in 16 patients (19.3%), including 9 (10.8%) with dose reduced ≥ 20%. Administrative adjustments (reductions > 10% to flat doses of 200 mg multiplications) accounted for 18.1% of the entire cohort. Grade ≥ 2 and ≥ 3 adverse events occurred in 83.1% and 56.6%, respectively. In a multivariate analysis, a ≥ 20% initial dose reduction remained an independent predictor of shorter PFS (HR: 2.6; 95% CI: 1.1-6.6; p = 0.04) and OS (HR: 6; 95% CI: 2-17.5; p = 0.001). Initial dose reduction did not affect toxicity.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In this preliminary report initial dose reduction of SG negatively impacted PFS and OS without reducing toxicity, highlighting the need for further studies and dosing policy adjustments.</p>","PeriodicalId":9556,"journal":{"name":"Cancer Chemotherapy and Pharmacology","volume":"95 1","pages":"97"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12496269/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cancer Chemotherapy and Pharmacology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00280-025-04823-3","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Sacituzumab govitecan (SG) is approved for metastatic triple-negative breast cancer in ≥ 2 line setting at 10 mg/kg IV on Days 1 and 8 (21-day cycle). Trials confirmed its superiority over 8 mg/kg with manageable safety. In practice, precautionary dose reductions are used despite no formal guidance. In Poland, fixed 200 mg vials and unreimbursed drug waste lead to early dose adjustments.
Methods: This retrospective study evaluated the impact of initial SG dose reduction on treatment outcomes and tolerability in Polish patients. Medical records provided data on baseline features, treatment, survival, and safety. Kaplan-Meier and chi-square tests were used for survival and group comparisons. A multivariate Cox model assessed the independent effect of dose reduction on overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS). Significance was set at p < 0.05.
Results: Among 83 patients (median age 55, range 30-86), initial dose reductions ≥ 10% were observed in 16 patients (19.3%), including 9 (10.8%) with dose reduced ≥ 20%. Administrative adjustments (reductions > 10% to flat doses of 200 mg multiplications) accounted for 18.1% of the entire cohort. Grade ≥ 2 and ≥ 3 adverse events occurred in 83.1% and 56.6%, respectively. In a multivariate analysis, a ≥ 20% initial dose reduction remained an independent predictor of shorter PFS (HR: 2.6; 95% CI: 1.1-6.6; p = 0.04) and OS (HR: 6; 95% CI: 2-17.5; p = 0.001). Initial dose reduction did not affect toxicity.
Conclusions: In this preliminary report initial dose reduction of SG negatively impacted PFS and OS without reducing toxicity, highlighting the need for further studies and dosing policy adjustments.
期刊介绍:
Addressing a wide range of pharmacologic and oncologic concerns on both experimental and clinical levels, Cancer Chemotherapy and Pharmacology is an eminent journal in the field. The primary focus in this rapid publication medium is on new anticancer agents, their experimental screening, preclinical toxicology and pharmacology, single and combined drug administration modalities, and clinical phase I, II and III trials. It is essential reading for pharmacologists and oncologists giving results recorded in the following areas: clinical toxicology, pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, drug interactions, and indications for chemotherapy in cancer treatment strategy.