Nardin Kirolos , Rachel Strauss , Tharani Raveendran , Charlotte Moore Hepburn , Natasha Saunders
{"title":"Governance of nonpowdered firearms across high-income countries: Results of a scoping review","authors":"Nardin Kirolos , Rachel Strauss , Tharani Raveendran , Charlotte Moore Hepburn , Natasha Saunders","doi":"10.1016/j.healthpol.2025.105450","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Nonpowdered firearms are commonly used in recreation but their projectiles can cause serious injuries. Understanding how nonpowdered firearms are governed is essential for injury prevention.</div></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><div>We aimed to describe legislative, regulatory, and prevention strategies that govern nonpowdered firearms in Organization for Economic Co-Operation and Development (OECD) countries.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We searched multiple academic databases and grey literature for information on nonpowdered firearm governance. Data were extracted and grouped into themes: weapon definitions, licensure, age restrictions, permitted locations for use, storage and transport, sale and transfer, imitation firearms, import/export, manufacturing, advertising, and monitoring systems. We conducted a comparative analysis of legislative frameworks, regulatory standards, and enforcement strategies.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Our findings revealed that 31 OECD countries (84%) have documented governance of nonpowdered firearms. Definitions for what constitutes a nonpowdered firearm varied based on the projectile mechanism (air, spring) and specific muzzle energy/velocity. In 61% of countries, licensure and age restrictions were mandatory. Regulations on use locations, storage, sale, and transfer were found in 26–32% of countries. Monitoring systems for production, sale, or possession existed in 13 countries. Injury surveillance systems were not readily identified.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>While commonalities exist nonpowdered firearm governance, substantial heterogeneity and gaps remain in legislation. This becomes problematic when governance approaches lack a foundation in clinical or physical evidence, limiting effective injury prevention. Evidence-informed definitions and methods to assess injury potential are essential for improving surveillance and guiding regulation. Strategies such as age and marketing restrictions, licensure, and safety equipment (eye protection) should be grounded in science. International guidance can support coherent, adaptable approaches across jurisdictions.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":55067,"journal":{"name":"Health Policy","volume":"162 ","pages":"Article 105450"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Policy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0168851025002052","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background
Nonpowdered firearms are commonly used in recreation but their projectiles can cause serious injuries. Understanding how nonpowdered firearms are governed is essential for injury prevention.
Objective
We aimed to describe legislative, regulatory, and prevention strategies that govern nonpowdered firearms in Organization for Economic Co-Operation and Development (OECD) countries.
Methods
We searched multiple academic databases and grey literature for information on nonpowdered firearm governance. Data were extracted and grouped into themes: weapon definitions, licensure, age restrictions, permitted locations for use, storage and transport, sale and transfer, imitation firearms, import/export, manufacturing, advertising, and monitoring systems. We conducted a comparative analysis of legislative frameworks, regulatory standards, and enforcement strategies.
Results
Our findings revealed that 31 OECD countries (84%) have documented governance of nonpowdered firearms. Definitions for what constitutes a nonpowdered firearm varied based on the projectile mechanism (air, spring) and specific muzzle energy/velocity. In 61% of countries, licensure and age restrictions were mandatory. Regulations on use locations, storage, sale, and transfer were found in 26–32% of countries. Monitoring systems for production, sale, or possession existed in 13 countries. Injury surveillance systems were not readily identified.
Conclusions
While commonalities exist nonpowdered firearm governance, substantial heterogeneity and gaps remain in legislation. This becomes problematic when governance approaches lack a foundation in clinical or physical evidence, limiting effective injury prevention. Evidence-informed definitions and methods to assess injury potential are essential for improving surveillance and guiding regulation. Strategies such as age and marketing restrictions, licensure, and safety equipment (eye protection) should be grounded in science. International guidance can support coherent, adaptable approaches across jurisdictions.
期刊介绍:
Health Policy is intended to be a vehicle for the exploration and discussion of health policy and health system issues and is aimed in particular at enhancing communication between health policy and system researchers, legislators, decision-makers and professionals concerned with developing, implementing, and analysing health policy, health systems and health care reforms, primarily in high-income countries outside the U.S.A.