Disparities in access, utilization, and outcomes of percutaneous coronary intervention in Hispanics compared to non-Hispanic Whites in the United States: A comprehensive review.

IF 1.9 Q3 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Eric C H Leung, James C Blankenship, Carolina Ponce Orellana, Deirdre Hill, Bharath Yarlagadda
{"title":"Disparities in access, utilization, and outcomes of percutaneous coronary intervention in Hispanics compared to non-Hispanic Whites in the United States: A comprehensive review.","authors":"Eric C H Leung, James C Blankenship, Carolina Ponce Orellana, Deirdre Hill, Bharath Yarlagadda","doi":"10.1016/j.carrev.2025.09.008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Ischemic heart disease is the leading cause of cardiovascular mortality in the United States, with percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) being one of the definitive treatments. Historically, data suggested Hispanics, when compared to non-Hispanic Whites, suffer worse acute coronary syndrome mortality rates. Therefore, we conducted a comprehensive literature review to summarize factors influencing PCI outcomes in this population.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In accordance with PRISMA guidelines for systematic reviews, we performed a literature search encompassing PCI for any indication with Hispanic-specific outcomes using the PubMed database through April 2025 yielding 69 studies. Authors independently screened search results and resolved discrepancies through consensus. Meta-analysis was performed where ever feasible using random effects models due to expected study heterogeneity.</p><p><strong>Results/data: </strong>Hispanics experience acute myocardial infarction more frequently and are more likely to present urgently or emergently than Whites. Hispanic ethnicity correlates with delayed door-to-balloon and catheterization laboratory activation times. Additionally, Hispanics are disproportionately admitted to low procedure volume hospitals with disparities in hospital quality resulting in inferior PCI outcomes. High Medicaid and uninsured rates in Hispanics reflect cost-prohibitive healthcare access limitations, resulting in a trend towards lower rates of resvascularization and procedural differences like stent utilization. However, in-hospital and long-term outcomes between Hispanic and White populations undergoing PCI are similar.</p><p><strong>Conclusion(s): </strong>This review uncovers an incongruity between profound disparities in access and utilization of PCI, driven by socio-economic determinants, and comparable in-hospital and mortality outcomes between Hispanics and Whites. Consequently, it highlights the need for increased research to improve patient outcomes and reduce health disparities.</p>","PeriodicalId":47657,"journal":{"name":"Cardiovascular Revascularization Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cardiovascular Revascularization Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carrev.2025.09.008","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Ischemic heart disease is the leading cause of cardiovascular mortality in the United States, with percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) being one of the definitive treatments. Historically, data suggested Hispanics, when compared to non-Hispanic Whites, suffer worse acute coronary syndrome mortality rates. Therefore, we conducted a comprehensive literature review to summarize factors influencing PCI outcomes in this population.

Methods: In accordance with PRISMA guidelines for systematic reviews, we performed a literature search encompassing PCI for any indication with Hispanic-specific outcomes using the PubMed database through April 2025 yielding 69 studies. Authors independently screened search results and resolved discrepancies through consensus. Meta-analysis was performed where ever feasible using random effects models due to expected study heterogeneity.

Results/data: Hispanics experience acute myocardial infarction more frequently and are more likely to present urgently or emergently than Whites. Hispanic ethnicity correlates with delayed door-to-balloon and catheterization laboratory activation times. Additionally, Hispanics are disproportionately admitted to low procedure volume hospitals with disparities in hospital quality resulting in inferior PCI outcomes. High Medicaid and uninsured rates in Hispanics reflect cost-prohibitive healthcare access limitations, resulting in a trend towards lower rates of resvascularization and procedural differences like stent utilization. However, in-hospital and long-term outcomes between Hispanic and White populations undergoing PCI are similar.

Conclusion(s): This review uncovers an incongruity between profound disparities in access and utilization of PCI, driven by socio-economic determinants, and comparable in-hospital and mortality outcomes between Hispanics and Whites. Consequently, it highlights the need for increased research to improve patient outcomes and reduce health disparities.

与非西班牙裔美国白人相比,西班牙裔美国人在经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的可及性、使用率和结果方面的差异:一项全面的综述。
背景:缺血性心脏病是美国心血管疾病死亡的主要原因,经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)是明确的治疗方法之一。历史上的数据表明,与非西班牙裔白人相比,西班牙裔人患急性冠状动脉综合征的死亡率更高。因此,我们进行了全面的文献综述,总结影响该人群PCI预后的因素。方法:根据PRISMA系统评价指南,我们使用PubMed数据库进行文献检索,检索到截至2025年4月的69项研究,包括PCI治疗的任何适应症和西班牙裔特定结果。作者独立筛选搜索结果,并通过共识解决差异。由于预期的研究异质性,在可行的情况下使用随机效应模型进行meta分析。结果/数据:与白人相比,西班牙裔更频繁地经历急性心肌梗死,更有可能出现紧急或紧急情况。西班牙裔与延迟门到球囊和导管实验室激活时间相关。此外,由于医院质量的差异导致PCI治疗结果较差,西班牙裔患者被不成比例地送入低手术量的医院。西班牙裔的高医疗补助率和未参保率反映了昂贵的医疗保健准入限制,导致了血管重建术和支架使用等手术差异率降低的趋势。然而,西班牙裔和白人接受PCI的住院和长期结果是相似的。结论:本综述揭示了由社会经济决定因素驱动的PCI获取和利用的深刻差异与西班牙裔和白人之间可比较的住院和死亡率结果之间的不一致。因此,它强调需要加强研究,以改善患者的治疗结果和减少健康差距。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Cardiovascular Revascularization Medicine
Cardiovascular Revascularization Medicine CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS-
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
5.90%
发文量
687
审稿时长
36 days
期刊介绍: Cardiovascular Revascularization Medicine (CRM) is an international and multidisciplinary journal that publishes original laboratory and clinical investigations related to revascularization therapies in cardiovascular medicine. Cardiovascular Revascularization Medicine publishes articles related to preclinical work and molecular interventions, including angiogenesis, cell therapy, pharmacological interventions, restenosis management, and prevention, including experiments conducted in human subjects, in laboratory animals, and in vitro. Specific areas of interest include percutaneous angioplasty in coronary and peripheral arteries, intervention in structural heart disease, cardiovascular surgery, etc.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信