Caregiver-reported barriers and facilitators to hospice enrollment for persons with dementia: A systematic review of qualitative evidence.

IF 3.9 2区 医学 Q1 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Palliative Medicine Pub Date : 2025-10-01 Epub Date: 2025-07-26 DOI:10.1177/02692163251353013
Oonjee Oh, Connie M Ulrich, Lauren Massimo, George Demiris
{"title":"Caregiver-reported barriers and facilitators to hospice enrollment for persons with dementia: A systematic review of qualitative evidence.","authors":"Oonjee Oh, Connie M Ulrich, Lauren Massimo, George Demiris","doi":"10.1177/02692163251353013","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Despite the increasing prevalence of dementia, persons with dementia often receive suboptimal care near the end of life. In many countries, specialized end-of-life support is offered by hospice. During the transitions to end-of-life care, caregivers play a crucial role in the decision-making and care provision for the persons with dementia. However, caregivers' experiences regarding the initial entry to hospice have not been comprehensively assessed in the dementia context.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To synthesize qualitative evidence on the caregiver-reported barriers and facilitators to hospice enrollment for persons with dementia.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Systematic review and thematic synthesisData sources:We conducted a systematic literature search across PubMed, CINAHL, Embase, PsycINFO, and Scopus. We considered articles published between 2009 and 2024 that contained qualitative data on hospice entry collected from dementia caregivers.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twenty-two articles met our study eligibility criteria. Five themes were identified: (a) caregivers' observation and perception of severe stage dementia, (b) whether hospice was the right choice for persons with dementia, (c) burden due to the practical aspects of caregiving, (d) emotions and perception about death and hospice, and (e) guidance and access to hospice. These five themes encompassed 11 facilitators and 15 barriers.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Dementia caregivers experience intrapersonal, interpersonal, emotional, logistical, and physical challenges in ensuring quality end-of-life support for their loved one (e.g. limited understanding of end-stage dementia, gatekeeping providers, and family conflicts). The unique needs of caregivers caring for a seriously ill family member with dementia are not being fully addressed by the current available services and policies.</p>","PeriodicalId":19849,"journal":{"name":"Palliative Medicine","volume":"39 9","pages":"948-964"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12476476/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Palliative Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/02692163251353013","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/7/26 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Despite the increasing prevalence of dementia, persons with dementia often receive suboptimal care near the end of life. In many countries, specialized end-of-life support is offered by hospice. During the transitions to end-of-life care, caregivers play a crucial role in the decision-making and care provision for the persons with dementia. However, caregivers' experiences regarding the initial entry to hospice have not been comprehensively assessed in the dementia context.

Aim: To synthesize qualitative evidence on the caregiver-reported barriers and facilitators to hospice enrollment for persons with dementia.

Design: Systematic review and thematic synthesisData sources:We conducted a systematic literature search across PubMed, CINAHL, Embase, PsycINFO, and Scopus. We considered articles published between 2009 and 2024 that contained qualitative data on hospice entry collected from dementia caregivers.

Results: Twenty-two articles met our study eligibility criteria. Five themes were identified: (a) caregivers' observation and perception of severe stage dementia, (b) whether hospice was the right choice for persons with dementia, (c) burden due to the practical aspects of caregiving, (d) emotions and perception about death and hospice, and (e) guidance and access to hospice. These five themes encompassed 11 facilitators and 15 barriers.

Conclusions: Dementia caregivers experience intrapersonal, interpersonal, emotional, logistical, and physical challenges in ensuring quality end-of-life support for their loved one (e.g. limited understanding of end-stage dementia, gatekeeping providers, and family conflicts). The unique needs of caregivers caring for a seriously ill family member with dementia are not being fully addressed by the current available services and policies.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

照护者报告的障碍与促进失智症患者接受安宁疗护的因素:一项质性证据的系统回顾。
背景:尽管痴呆症的患病率越来越高,但痴呆症患者在临终前往往得不到最佳护理。在许多国家,临终关怀机构提供专门的临终支持。在向临终关怀过渡期间,护理人员在痴呆症患者的决策和护理提供方面发挥着至关重要的作用。然而,照护者的经验,关于最初进入安宁疗护尚未全面评估在痴呆症的情况下。目的:综合有关照护者报告的痴呆患者安宁疗护登记障碍和促进因素的定性证据。设计:系统综述和专题综合数据来源:我们对PubMed、CINAHL、Embase、PsycINFO和Scopus进行了系统的文献检索。我们考虑了2009年至2024年间发表的文章,这些文章包含了从痴呆症护理人员那里收集的临终关怀入院的定性数据。结果:22篇文章符合我们的研究资格标准。研究确定了五个主题:(a)照护者对严重阶段失智症的观察和看法,(b)安宁疗护是否是失智症患者的正确选择,(c)实际照护所带来的负担,(d)对死亡和安宁疗护的情绪和看法,以及(e)安宁疗护的指导和获得。这五个主题包括11个促进因素和15个障碍。结论:痴呆症护理人员在确保为其所爱的人提供高质量的临终支持方面面临着个人、人际、情感、后勤和身体方面的挑战(例如,对终末期痴呆症的了解有限、把关提供者和家庭冲突)。目前现有的服务和政策没有充分解决照顾患有痴呆症的重病家庭成员的护理人员的独特需求。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Palliative Medicine
Palliative Medicine 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
7.60
自引率
9.10%
发文量
125
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Palliative Medicine is a highly ranked, peer reviewed scholarly journal dedicated to improving knowledge and clinical practice in the palliative care of patients with far advanced disease. This outstanding journal features editorials, original papers, review articles, case reports, correspondence and book reviews. Essential reading for all members of the palliative care team. This journal is a member of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信