The decision-making process in general practice of when to use antibiotics to treat acute rhinosinusitis.

IF 1.8 3区 医学 Q3 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Thomas Victor Christensen, Malene Plejdrup Hansen, Morten Sig Ager Jensen, Camilla Hoffmann Merrild
{"title":"The decision-making process in general practice of when to use antibiotics to treat acute rhinosinusitis.","authors":"Thomas Victor Christensen, Malene Plejdrup Hansen, Morten Sig Ager Jensen, Camilla Hoffmann Merrild","doi":"10.1080/02813432.2025.2568043","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The Danish primary care sector is responsible for the majority of antibiotic prescriptions, with upper respiratory tract infections, particularly acute rhinosinusitis (ARS), being a key contributor. This study explored the decision-making process regarding antibiotic use for ARS among general practitioners (GPs) and doctors in training working in general practice.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Nine semi-structured interviews were conducted with 10 doctors. Interviews were audio-recorded, transcribed verbatim and analyzed using systematic text condensation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Four key themes were developed: (1) 'It all starts before the consultation': staff-led triage shaping ARS care, (2) two diagnostic worlds: experienced intuition vs. rule-bound caution, (3) C-reactive protein (CRP) in the crossfire: guide, reassurance or irrelevant in antibiotic decision-making and (4) 'Sometimes it's a negotiation': managing patient expectations without losing stewardship. Although diagnosing ARS was often straightforward, distinguishing bacterial from viral infections proved difficult. C-reactive protein testing was common, but its reliability was questioned. Antibiotic prescribing decisions were influenced by patient history, comorbidities and risk factors. While antibiotics were rarely considered necessary initially, patient expectations and doctor-patient relationships sometimes influenced prescribing.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study illustrates the complexity of diagnosing and managing ARS, shaped by clinical uncertainty, competing priorities and non-clinical pressures. Variation in doctor involvement, diagnostic practices and CRP thresholds reveals the challenges of standardization. Training, guidelines and patient education are valued but may not ensure optimal antibiotic use. Diagnostic decisions are relational, negotiated and context-specific, influenced by public health concerns, patient needs and workflow demands. Without acknowledging this complexity, antibiotic stewardship efforts could potentially fall short.</p>","PeriodicalId":21521,"journal":{"name":"Scandinavian Journal of Primary Health Care","volume":" ","pages":"1-14"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scandinavian Journal of Primary Health Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/02813432.2025.2568043","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The Danish primary care sector is responsible for the majority of antibiotic prescriptions, with upper respiratory tract infections, particularly acute rhinosinusitis (ARS), being a key contributor. This study explored the decision-making process regarding antibiotic use for ARS among general practitioners (GPs) and doctors in training working in general practice.

Methods: Nine semi-structured interviews were conducted with 10 doctors. Interviews were audio-recorded, transcribed verbatim and analyzed using systematic text condensation.

Results: Four key themes were developed: (1) 'It all starts before the consultation': staff-led triage shaping ARS care, (2) two diagnostic worlds: experienced intuition vs. rule-bound caution, (3) C-reactive protein (CRP) in the crossfire: guide, reassurance or irrelevant in antibiotic decision-making and (4) 'Sometimes it's a negotiation': managing patient expectations without losing stewardship. Although diagnosing ARS was often straightforward, distinguishing bacterial from viral infections proved difficult. C-reactive protein testing was common, but its reliability was questioned. Antibiotic prescribing decisions were influenced by patient history, comorbidities and risk factors. While antibiotics were rarely considered necessary initially, patient expectations and doctor-patient relationships sometimes influenced prescribing.

Conclusions: This study illustrates the complexity of diagnosing and managing ARS, shaped by clinical uncertainty, competing priorities and non-clinical pressures. Variation in doctor involvement, diagnostic practices and CRP thresholds reveals the challenges of standardization. Training, guidelines and patient education are valued but may not ensure optimal antibiotic use. Diagnostic decisions are relational, negotiated and context-specific, influenced by public health concerns, patient needs and workflow demands. Without acknowledging this complexity, antibiotic stewardship efforts could potentially fall short.

一般实践中何时使用抗生素治疗急性鼻窦炎的决策过程。
背景:丹麦初级保健部门负责大部分抗生素处方,上呼吸道感染,特别是急性鼻窦炎(ARS)是一个关键因素。本研究探讨了全科医生(gp)和全科培训医生在ARS中使用抗生素的决策过程。方法:对10名医生进行9次半结构化访谈。访谈录音,逐字转录,并使用系统的文本浓缩分析。结果:开发了四个关键主题:(1)“一切从会诊前开始”:以员工为主导的分诊塑造ARS护理;(2)两个诊断世界:经验丰富的直觉与规则约束的谨慎;(3)c反应蛋白(CRP)在交叉冲突中:指导、保证或无关抗生素决策;(4)“有时是谈判”:在不失去管理的情况下管理患者期望。虽然诊断ARS通常很简单,但区分细菌感染和病毒感染却很困难。c反应蛋白检测很常见,但其可靠性受到质疑。抗生素处方决定受患者病史、合并症和危险因素的影响。虽然最初很少认为抗生素是必要的,但患者的期望和医患关系有时会影响处方。结论:本研究说明了诊断和管理ARS的复杂性,这是由临床不确定性、竞争优先事项和非临床压力所决定的。医生参与、诊断实践和CRP阈值的变化揭示了标准化的挑战。培训、指南和患者教育是有价值的,但可能不能确保最佳的抗生素使用。诊断决定是相关的、协商的和具体情况的,受公共卫生问题、患者需求和工作流程要求的影响。如果不承认这种复杂性,抗生素管理工作可能会功亏一篑。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
19.00%
发文量
47
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Scandinavian Journal of Primary Health Care is an international online open access journal publishing articles with relevance to general practice and primary health care. Focusing on the continuous professional development in family medicine the journal addresses clinical, epidemiological and humanistic topics in relation to the daily clinical practice. Scandinavian Journal of Primary Health Care is owned by the members of the National Colleges of General Practice in the five Nordic countries through the Nordic Federation of General Practice (NFGP). The journal includes original research on topics related to general practice and family medicine, and publishes both quantitative and qualitative original research, editorials, discussion and analysis papers and reviews to facilitate continuing professional development in family medicine. The journal''s topics range broadly and include: • Clinical family medicine • Epidemiological research • Qualitative research • Health services research.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信