Non-Clozapine interventions in treatment-resistant schizophrenia: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

IF 10.1 1区 医学 Q1 BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY
Richard Carr, Alistair Cannon, Valeria Finelli, Bernard Bukala, Yesim Cimen, Patritsiya Filipova, Connor Cummings, Toby Pillinger, Oliver D Howes, Robert A McCutcheon
{"title":"Non-Clozapine interventions in treatment-resistant schizophrenia: a systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"Richard Carr, Alistair Cannon, Valeria Finelli, Bernard Bukala, Yesim Cimen, Patritsiya Filipova, Connor Cummings, Toby Pillinger, Oliver D Howes, Robert A McCutcheon","doi":"10.1038/s41380-025-03255-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and hypothesis: </strong>Clozapine is the only licensed pharmacotherapy for treatment resistant schizophrenia (TRS), but in some cases is not a suitable treatment option. A review of the efficacy of non-clozapine interventions in TRS may help inform clinical decision making when clozapine treatment is not feasible.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>A systematic review and meta-analysis was performed investigating the efficacy of non-clozapine augmentation of antipsychotic treatment in TRS on positive, negative, and total symptoms. The review protocol is registered at PROSPERO (ID: CRD42023418053). PsycInfo, PubMed and EMBASE were searched up until July 2023. Cochrane Risk of Bias tool (v2) was used to assess study quality. Data were pooled using a random-effects model for each class of intervention to give an estimate of effect size (Hedges' g).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>78 studies were included, of which 68 were included in the meta-analysis, comprising 3241 patients. High-dose antipsychotics (7 studies, 467 participants) did not improve any symptom domain. Augmentation of antipsychotics with glycine modulatory site agonists (9 studies, 187 participants) improved positive (g = -0.56 [-0.81, -0.31], GRADE rating Low), negative (g = -1.18 [-1.49, -0.87], GRADE rating Low) and total (g = -1.17 [-1.75, -0.59], GRADE rating Very Low) symptoms. Non-invasive stimulation (26 studies, 893 participants) moderately benefited positive symptoms (g = -0.42 [-0.65, -0.18], GRADE rating Low). Psychotherapy (10 studies, 565 participants) moderately improved positive symptoms (g = -0.56 [-1.01, -0.10], GRADE rating Low). Augmentation with antidepressants (3 studies, 187 participants) improved negative (g = -0.74 [-1.46, -0.02], GRADE rating Very Low) and total (g = -0.69 [-1.00, -0.38], GRADE rating Low) symptoms. Sample sizes were small, and publication bias was apparent for non-invasive stimulation studies.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Several augmentation strategies, including pharmacotherapy, non-invasive stimulation, and psychotherapy demonstrated benefit in small studies, however no intervention reached the threshold of evidence to be routinely recommended as a viable alternative to clozapine. High-quality trials are needed for definitive recommendations.</p>","PeriodicalId":19008,"journal":{"name":"Molecular Psychiatry","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":10.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Molecular Psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41380-025-03255-y","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and hypothesis: Clozapine is the only licensed pharmacotherapy for treatment resistant schizophrenia (TRS), but in some cases is not a suitable treatment option. A review of the efficacy of non-clozapine interventions in TRS may help inform clinical decision making when clozapine treatment is not feasible.

Study design: A systematic review and meta-analysis was performed investigating the efficacy of non-clozapine augmentation of antipsychotic treatment in TRS on positive, negative, and total symptoms. The review protocol is registered at PROSPERO (ID: CRD42023418053). PsycInfo, PubMed and EMBASE were searched up until July 2023. Cochrane Risk of Bias tool (v2) was used to assess study quality. Data were pooled using a random-effects model for each class of intervention to give an estimate of effect size (Hedges' g).

Results: 78 studies were included, of which 68 were included in the meta-analysis, comprising 3241 patients. High-dose antipsychotics (7 studies, 467 participants) did not improve any symptom domain. Augmentation of antipsychotics with glycine modulatory site agonists (9 studies, 187 participants) improved positive (g = -0.56 [-0.81, -0.31], GRADE rating Low), negative (g = -1.18 [-1.49, -0.87], GRADE rating Low) and total (g = -1.17 [-1.75, -0.59], GRADE rating Very Low) symptoms. Non-invasive stimulation (26 studies, 893 participants) moderately benefited positive symptoms (g = -0.42 [-0.65, -0.18], GRADE rating Low). Psychotherapy (10 studies, 565 participants) moderately improved positive symptoms (g = -0.56 [-1.01, -0.10], GRADE rating Low). Augmentation with antidepressants (3 studies, 187 participants) improved negative (g = -0.74 [-1.46, -0.02], GRADE rating Very Low) and total (g = -0.69 [-1.00, -0.38], GRADE rating Low) symptoms. Sample sizes were small, and publication bias was apparent for non-invasive stimulation studies.

Conclusions: Several augmentation strategies, including pharmacotherapy, non-invasive stimulation, and psychotherapy demonstrated benefit in small studies, however no intervention reached the threshold of evidence to be routinely recommended as a viable alternative to clozapine. High-quality trials are needed for definitive recommendations.

非氯氮平干预治疗难治性精神分裂症:一项系统回顾和荟萃分析。
背景和假设:氯氮平是治疗难治性精神分裂症(TRS)的唯一许可药物治疗,但在某些情况下不是一种合适的治疗选择。回顾非氯氮平干预对TRS的疗效,可能有助于在氯氮平治疗不可行的情况下为临床决策提供信息。研究设计:进行系统回顾和荟萃分析,调查非氯氮平增强TRS抗精神病治疗对阳性、阴性和总症状的疗效。审查方案在PROSPERO注册(ID: CRD42023418053)。PsycInfo, PubMed和EMBASE的检索截止到2023年7月。采用Cochrane风险偏倚工具(v2)评估研究质量。使用随机效应模型对每一类干预进行汇总,以估计效果大小(Hedges’g)。结果:纳入78项研究,其中68项纳入meta分析,共3241例患者。大剂量抗精神病药物(7项研究,467名受试者)没有改善任何症状域。甘氨酸调节部位激动剂增强抗精神病药物(9项研究,187名受试者)改善阳性(g = -0.56 [-0.81, -0.31], GRADE评分低)、阴性(g = -1.18 [-1.49, -0.87], GRADE评分低)和总(g = -1.17 [-1.75, -0.59], GRADE评分极低)症状。非侵入性刺激(26项研究,893名受试者)中度改善阳性症状(g = -0.42 [-0.65, -0.18], GRADE评级低)。心理治疗(10项研究,565名受试者)中度改善阳性症状(g = -0.56 [-1.01, -0.10], GRADE评分低)。抗抑郁药的增强(3项研究,187名受试者)改善了阴性症状(g = -0.74 [-1.46, -0.02], GRADE评分极低)和总症状(g = -0.69 [-1.00, -0.38], GRADE评分低)。样本量较小,非侵入性刺激研究的发表偏倚很明显。结论:包括药物治疗、非侵入性刺激和心理治疗在内的几种增强策略在小型研究中显示出益处,但没有证据表明干预措施可以作为氯氮平的可行替代方案被常规推荐。需要高质量的试验来提供明确的建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Molecular Psychiatry
Molecular Psychiatry 医学-精神病学
CiteScore
20.50
自引率
4.50%
发文量
459
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Molecular Psychiatry focuses on publishing research that aims to uncover the biological mechanisms behind psychiatric disorders and their treatment. The journal emphasizes studies that bridge pre-clinical and clinical research, covering cellular, molecular, integrative, clinical, imaging, and psychopharmacology levels.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信