Reliability and Validity of the Cartesian Optoelectronic Dynamic Anthropometer Motion Analysis System to Measure Cervical Range of Motion in Healthy Participants.

IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q4 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Jie Li, Zefeng Yu, Pan Diao, Dong Wang, Haopeng Li, Xijing He, Fang Wang
{"title":"Reliability and Validity of the Cartesian Optoelectronic Dynamic Anthropometer Motion Analysis System to Measure Cervical Range of Motion in Healthy Participants.","authors":"Jie Li, Zefeng Yu, Pan Diao, Dong Wang, Haopeng Li, Xijing He, Fang Wang","doi":"10.1016/j.jmpt.2025.09.003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The Cartesian Optoelectronic Dynamic Anthropometer (CODA) motion analysis system is a new instrument that measures 3-dimensional joint movement. The study aimed to investigate the reliability and validity of the CODA motion analysis system in assessing the cervical range of motion in healthy people.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 41 healthy participants were included. Movements in 3 planes (flexion and extension, right and left lateral bending, and right and left axial rotation) were measured by using the CODA motion analysis system. The results for flexion-extension and lateral bending movements were compared with those obtained by a standard inclinometer. Intraobserver and interobserver reliability and validity were assessed using the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) method. SE of measurement (SEM) and minimal detectable change (MDC) values were also calculated to identify the measurement errors.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>High interobserver reliability (ICC range, 0.89-0.94) and validity (ICC range, 0.73-0.89) were found for all 3 planes, while the intraobserver reliability (ICC range, 0.76-0.92) was high, except for right lateral bending (ICC, 0.76) and left axial rotation movements (ICC, 0.84). All SEM and MDC values for intraobserver, interobserver, and criterion validity studies were less than 5° and 10°, respectively. Percentage of SEM of ≤10% and percentage of MDC of ≤30% were obtained for all variables.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The CODA motion analysis system is a highly reliable, noninvasive, easy-to-use, and reproducible 3-dimensional device for measuring cervical range of motion. It demonstrated good reliability for flexion-extension and lateral bending movements.</p>","PeriodicalId":16132,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Manipulative and Physiological Therapeutics","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Manipulative and Physiological Therapeutics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmpt.2025.09.003","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: The Cartesian Optoelectronic Dynamic Anthropometer (CODA) motion analysis system is a new instrument that measures 3-dimensional joint movement. The study aimed to investigate the reliability and validity of the CODA motion analysis system in assessing the cervical range of motion in healthy people.

Methods: A total of 41 healthy participants were included. Movements in 3 planes (flexion and extension, right and left lateral bending, and right and left axial rotation) were measured by using the CODA motion analysis system. The results for flexion-extension and lateral bending movements were compared with those obtained by a standard inclinometer. Intraobserver and interobserver reliability and validity were assessed using the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) method. SE of measurement (SEM) and minimal detectable change (MDC) values were also calculated to identify the measurement errors.

Results: High interobserver reliability (ICC range, 0.89-0.94) and validity (ICC range, 0.73-0.89) were found for all 3 planes, while the intraobserver reliability (ICC range, 0.76-0.92) was high, except for right lateral bending (ICC, 0.76) and left axial rotation movements (ICC, 0.84). All SEM and MDC values for intraobserver, interobserver, and criterion validity studies were less than 5° and 10°, respectively. Percentage of SEM of ≤10% and percentage of MDC of ≤30% were obtained for all variables.

Conclusion: The CODA motion analysis system is a highly reliable, noninvasive, easy-to-use, and reproducible 3-dimensional device for measuring cervical range of motion. It demonstrated good reliability for flexion-extension and lateral bending movements.

笛卡儿光电动力人体测量仪运动分析系统测量健康受试者颈椎活动度的信度和效度。
目的:笛卡儿光电动态人体测量仪(CODA)运动分析系统是一种测量关节三维运动的新型仪器。本研究旨在探讨CODA运动分析系统评估健康人颈椎活动度的信度和效度。方法:共纳入41名健康受试者。采用CODA运动分析系统测量3个平面(屈伸、左右侧向弯曲、左右轴向旋转)的运动。弯曲-伸展和侧向弯曲运动的结果与标准倾角仪获得的结果进行了比较。使用类内相关系数(ICC)方法评估观察者内部和观察者之间的信度和效度。还计算了测量SE (SEM)和最小可检测变化(MDC)值,以识别测量误差。结果:3个平面均有较高的观察者间信度(ICC范围,0.89 ~ 0.94)和效度(ICC范围,0.73 ~ 0.89),而观察者内信度(ICC范围,0.76 ~ 0.92)除右侧弯曲(ICC, 0.76)和左侧轴向旋转运动(ICC, 0.84)外均有较高信度(ICC范围,0.76 ~ 0.92)。观察者内部、观察者之间和标准效度研究的所有SEM和MDC值分别小于5°和10°。所有变量的SEM百分比≤10%,MDC百分比≤30%。结论:CODA运动分析系统是一种高度可靠、无创、易于使用、可重复性高的测量颈椎运动范围的三维仪器。它证明了良好的可靠性屈伸和侧向弯曲运动。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
7.70%
发文量
63
审稿时长
29 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Manipulative and Physiological Therapeutics (JMPT) is an international and interdisciplinary journal dedicated to the advancement of conservative health care principles and practices. The JMPT is the premier biomedical publication in the chiropractic profession and publishes peer reviewed, research articles and the Journal''s editorial board includes leading researchers from around the world. The Journal publishes original primary research and review articles of the highest quality in relevant topic areas. The JMPT addresses practitioners and researchers needs by adding to their clinical and basic science knowledge and by informing them about relevant issues that influence health care practices.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信