Yang Wang, Mark Meiselbach, Xu Wang, Ge Bai, Gerard Anderson
{"title":"Commercial Prices for Primary Care Physician Office Visits.","authors":"Yang Wang, Mark Meiselbach, Xu Wang, Ge Bai, Gerard Anderson","doi":"10.1007/s11606-025-09798-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Primary care is the frontline and cornerstone of the US healthcare system. Prices paid by commercial insurance plans, which cover the majority of the US population, influence primary care physicians' (PCPs) labor supply and patients' access to care. However, little is known regarding the level and variation of commercial prices for primary care and the associated factors.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To examine the level and variation in commercial prices for PCP office visits and assess physician-level, practice-level, and market-level factors that explain the price variation.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Cross-sectional observational study.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>A total of 174,561 PCPs offering office visit services for commercially insured patients from four national insurers-Blue Cross Blue Shield (BCBS), Cigna, Elevance Health, and United Healthcare, using insurer-disclosed Transparency in Coverage (TiC) pricing data as of March 2024.</p><p><strong>Main measures: </strong>Outcomes are 876,079 commercial prices for level 3 PCP office visits for both new and established patients, measured at the physician-insurer-service level.</p><p><strong>Key results: </strong>National mean commercial prices were $145.2 (95% CI $145.0-$145.4) and $101.6 (95% CI $101.5-$101.7) for level 3 new and established patient office visits, respectively. For new patient office visits, PCPs with corporate ownership obtained 17.9% (95% CI 17.7-18.2%) higher prices. PCPs practicing in organizations with more than 100 physicians negotiated 28% (95% CI 27.3-28.7%) higher prices than solo practices. Prevalence of corporate ownership and large practice affiliation was substantially higher among young PCPs aged 31-40. PCPs specializing in family medicine and practicing in counties with lower median household income negotiated lower prices. Results were consistent for established patient office visits.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>PCPs' corporate ownership, size of practice, age, specialty, and local income level are important factors that explain the commercial pricing variation and are crucial for improving the US primary care system.</p>","PeriodicalId":15860,"journal":{"name":"Journal of General Internal Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of General Internal Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-025-09798-8","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Primary care is the frontline and cornerstone of the US healthcare system. Prices paid by commercial insurance plans, which cover the majority of the US population, influence primary care physicians' (PCPs) labor supply and patients' access to care. However, little is known regarding the level and variation of commercial prices for primary care and the associated factors.
Objective: To examine the level and variation in commercial prices for PCP office visits and assess physician-level, practice-level, and market-level factors that explain the price variation.
Design: Cross-sectional observational study.
Participants: A total of 174,561 PCPs offering office visit services for commercially insured patients from four national insurers-Blue Cross Blue Shield (BCBS), Cigna, Elevance Health, and United Healthcare, using insurer-disclosed Transparency in Coverage (TiC) pricing data as of March 2024.
Main measures: Outcomes are 876,079 commercial prices for level 3 PCP office visits for both new and established patients, measured at the physician-insurer-service level.
Key results: National mean commercial prices were $145.2 (95% CI $145.0-$145.4) and $101.6 (95% CI $101.5-$101.7) for level 3 new and established patient office visits, respectively. For new patient office visits, PCPs with corporate ownership obtained 17.9% (95% CI 17.7-18.2%) higher prices. PCPs practicing in organizations with more than 100 physicians negotiated 28% (95% CI 27.3-28.7%) higher prices than solo practices. Prevalence of corporate ownership and large practice affiliation was substantially higher among young PCPs aged 31-40. PCPs specializing in family medicine and practicing in counties with lower median household income negotiated lower prices. Results were consistent for established patient office visits.
Conclusions: PCPs' corporate ownership, size of practice, age, specialty, and local income level are important factors that explain the commercial pricing variation and are crucial for improving the US primary care system.
背景:初级保健是美国医疗保健系统的前沿和基石。覆盖美国大多数人口的商业保险计划支付的价格影响着初级保健医生(pcp)的劳动力供应和患者获得护理的机会。然而,人们对初级保健商业价格的水平和变化及其相关因素知之甚少。目的:探讨PCP门诊商业价格的水平和变化,评估医生水平、执业水平和市场水平因素对价格变化的解释。设计:横断面观察性研究。参与者:共有174,561家pcp为来自四家全国性保险公司(蓝十字蓝盾(BCBS)、信诺(Cigna)、Elevance Health和United Healthcare)的商业保险患者提供办公室就诊服务,使用截至2024年3月保险公司披露的覆盖透明度(TiC)定价数据。主要测量:结果是在医生-保险公司-服务水平测量的新老患者的三级PCP办公室就诊的876,079商业价格。主要结果:国家平均商业价格分别为145.2美元(95% CI $145.0-$145.4)和101.6美元(95% CI $101.5-$101.7)。对于新就诊的患者,拥有公司所有权的pcp的价格高出17.9% (95% CI 17.7-18.2%)。在拥有超过100名医生的组织中执业的pcp谈判的价格比单独执业高28% (95% CI 27.3-28.7%)。在31-40岁的年轻pcp中,公司所有权和大型执业关系的患病率明显更高。在家庭收入中位数较低的县,专门从事家庭医学的pcp协商出较低的价格。结果与已建立的患者办公室访问一致。结论:pcp的公司所有权、执业规模、年龄、专业和当地收入水平是解释商业定价差异的重要因素,对改善美国初级保健制度至关重要。
期刊介绍:
The Journal of General Internal Medicine is the official journal of the Society of General Internal Medicine. It promotes improved patient care, research, and education in primary care, general internal medicine, and hospital medicine. Its articles focus on topics such as clinical medicine, epidemiology, prevention, health care delivery, curriculum development, and numerous other non-traditional themes, in addition to classic clinical research on problems in internal medicine.