Noninvasive diagnostic method for gastric subepithelial tumors based on circularity: a multicenter prospective study.

IF 3.6 3区 医学 Q2 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
Digestion Pub Date : 2025-10-03 DOI:10.1159/000548504
Eriko Koizumi, Osamu Goto, Teppei Akimoto, Yumiko Ishikawa, Hiroto Noda, Toshiaki Otsuka, Shun Nakagome, Masahiro Niikawa, Tsugumi Habu, Keiichiro Yoshikata, Kumiko Kirita, Kazutoshi Higuchi, Takeshi Onda, Jun Omori, Naohiko Akimoto, Katsuhiko Iwakiri
{"title":"Noninvasive diagnostic method for gastric subepithelial tumors based on circularity: a multicenter prospective study.","authors":"Eriko Koizumi, Osamu Goto, Teppei Akimoto, Yumiko Ishikawa, Hiroto Noda, Toshiaki Otsuka, Shun Nakagome, Masahiro Niikawa, Tsugumi Habu, Keiichiro Yoshikata, Kumiko Kirita, Kazutoshi Higuchi, Takeshi Onda, Jun Omori, Naohiko Akimoto, Katsuhiko Iwakiri","doi":"10.1159/000548504","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Introduction Gastric subepithelial tumors (SETs) including gastrointestinal mesenchymal tumors (GIMTs)-which often appear as similar hypoechoic lesions originating from the fourth layer of the gastric wall-are difficult to distinguish with endoscopic ultrasound (EUS). We aimed to prospectively validate the utility of circularity, a surrogate indicator of roundness, as a diagnostic method for SETs. Methods Among 100 patients with potential GIMTs sized 1-5 cm prospectively recruited at two institutions between 2020 and 2023, those who experienced pathological diagnosis were included in the final analysis. One representative EUS image showing the tumors' maximum cross-sectional surface was selected, and the circularity was measured using an image analysis software. The circularity of the leiomyoma and other SETs suspected GIMTs was compared, and the diagnostic performance at the optimal cutoff value was evaluated. Results In the 62 patients, the number of GIST, leiomyomas, and other SETs were 46, 10, and 6, respectively. Circularity was significantly lower in the leiomyoma group than in the other SETs group (0.846 vs. 0.924). The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of circularity for predicting leiomyomas was 0.822 when the cutoff value was set to 0.869. When the lesion was diagnosed as leiomyoma with a circularity of <0.869, the accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity were 85.5%, 70%, and 84.6%, respectively. Discussion The noninvasive diagnostic method for SETs based on circularity is useful for excluding leiomyomas in lesions of 1-5 cm in size. This diagnostic method may be a potential adjunctive option for differentiating SETs.</p>","PeriodicalId":11315,"journal":{"name":"Digestion","volume":" ","pages":"1-21"},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Digestion","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000548504","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction Gastric subepithelial tumors (SETs) including gastrointestinal mesenchymal tumors (GIMTs)-which often appear as similar hypoechoic lesions originating from the fourth layer of the gastric wall-are difficult to distinguish with endoscopic ultrasound (EUS). We aimed to prospectively validate the utility of circularity, a surrogate indicator of roundness, as a diagnostic method for SETs. Methods Among 100 patients with potential GIMTs sized 1-5 cm prospectively recruited at two institutions between 2020 and 2023, those who experienced pathological diagnosis were included in the final analysis. One representative EUS image showing the tumors' maximum cross-sectional surface was selected, and the circularity was measured using an image analysis software. The circularity of the leiomyoma and other SETs suspected GIMTs was compared, and the diagnostic performance at the optimal cutoff value was evaluated. Results In the 62 patients, the number of GIST, leiomyomas, and other SETs were 46, 10, and 6, respectively. Circularity was significantly lower in the leiomyoma group than in the other SETs group (0.846 vs. 0.924). The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of circularity for predicting leiomyomas was 0.822 when the cutoff value was set to 0.869. When the lesion was diagnosed as leiomyoma with a circularity of <0.869, the accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity were 85.5%, 70%, and 84.6%, respectively. Discussion The noninvasive diagnostic method for SETs based on circularity is useful for excluding leiomyomas in lesions of 1-5 cm in size. This diagnostic method may be a potential adjunctive option for differentiating SETs.

基于循环的胃上皮下肿瘤无创诊断方法:一项多中心前瞻性研究。
胃上皮下肿瘤(SETs)包括胃肠道间充质肿瘤(GIMTs)-通常表现为起源于胃壁第四层的类似低回声病变-难以用内镜超声(EUS)区分。我们的目的是前瞻性地验证圆度(圆度的替代指标)作为SETs诊断方法的实用性。方法在2020年至2023年期间,在两家机构前瞻性招募100例1-5 cm的潜在GIMTs患者,最终分析经病理诊断的患者。选择一张具有代表性的EUS图像显示肿瘤的最大横截面,并使用图像分析软件测量圆度。比较平滑肌瘤和其他疑似GIMTs的set的圆度,并评估最佳截断值下的诊断性能。结果62例患者中,GIST 46例,平滑肌瘤10例,其他set 6例。平滑肌瘤组的圆度明显低于其他set组(0.846比0.924)。当截断值设为0.869时,预测平滑肌瘤的受试者工作特征曲线下圆形面积为0.822。当病变被诊断为圆形的平滑肌瘤时
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Digestion
Digestion 医学-胃肠肝病学
CiteScore
7.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
39
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: ''Digestion'' concentrates on clinical research reports: in addition to editorials and reviews, the journal features sections on Stomach/Esophagus, Bowel, Neuro-Gastroenterology, Liver/Bile, Pancreas, Metabolism/Nutrition and Gastrointestinal Oncology. Papers cover physiology in humans, metabolic studies and clinical work on the etiology, diagnosis, and therapy of human diseases. It is thus especially cut out for gastroenterologists employed in hospitals and outpatient units. Moreover, the journal''s coverage of studies on the metabolism and effects of therapeutic drugs carries considerable value for clinicians and investigators beyond the immediate field of gastroenterology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信