Red blood cell transfusions in advanced cancer near the end-of-life: narrative review.

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q3 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Daniele Marelli, Michela Romelli, Cristina Cornali, Daniela Martinelli, Andrea Sbrana, Cosimo Chelazzi
{"title":"Red blood cell transfusions in advanced cancer near the end-of-life: narrative review.","authors":"Daniele Marelli, Michela Romelli, Cristina Cornali, Daniela Martinelli, Andrea Sbrana, Cosimo Chelazzi","doi":"10.1136/spcare-2025-005579","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Red blood cell (RBC) transfusions are commonly used to manage anemia-related symptoms, such as fatigue and dyspnea in patients with advanced cancer. Their use in palliative care (PC) remains controversial due to the lack of clear guidelines, potential risks, and ethical considerations.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This narrative review aims to evaluate the role of RBC transfusions in patients with advanced cancer and those at the end of life.</p><p><strong>Methods and data sources: </strong>A comprehensive review of relevant existing literature was performed in various databases, using combinations of relevant keywords. Only studies published in English were considered.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>Anemia affects up to 77% of men and 68% of women with advanced cancer in palliative care. RBC transfusions may offer temporary symptomatic relief, but evidence supporting their routine use in palliative cancer patients is inconclusive. Studies report subjective response rates ranging from 31% to 70%. Benefits on fatigue and dyspnea often last <2 weeks and 23-35% of patients die within two weeks after the transfusion, raising concerns about futility. Variability in transfusion practices across different palliative care settings highlights the influence of clinician attitudes, resource availability, and institutional policies.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>RBC transfusions in advanced cancer and end-of-life care should be considered on a case-by-case basis, prioritizing patient-centered decision-making and ethical considerations. Though the benefit is often short, they may improve the quality of life for highly selected patients. Risks such as adverse reactions and resource allocation concerns must be considered. Further research is needed to establish evidence-based guidelines and standardized assessment tools to evaluate transfusion efficacy in this population.</p>","PeriodicalId":9136,"journal":{"name":"BMJ Supportive & Palliative Care","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMJ Supportive & Palliative Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/spcare-2025-005579","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Red blood cell (RBC) transfusions are commonly used to manage anemia-related symptoms, such as fatigue and dyspnea in patients with advanced cancer. Their use in palliative care (PC) remains controversial due to the lack of clear guidelines, potential risks, and ethical considerations.

Objective: This narrative review aims to evaluate the role of RBC transfusions in patients with advanced cancer and those at the end of life.

Methods and data sources: A comprehensive review of relevant existing literature was performed in various databases, using combinations of relevant keywords. Only studies published in English were considered.

Findings: Anemia affects up to 77% of men and 68% of women with advanced cancer in palliative care. RBC transfusions may offer temporary symptomatic relief, but evidence supporting their routine use in palliative cancer patients is inconclusive. Studies report subjective response rates ranging from 31% to 70%. Benefits on fatigue and dyspnea often last <2 weeks and 23-35% of patients die within two weeks after the transfusion, raising concerns about futility. Variability in transfusion practices across different palliative care settings highlights the influence of clinician attitudes, resource availability, and institutional policies.

Conclusion: RBC transfusions in advanced cancer and end-of-life care should be considered on a case-by-case basis, prioritizing patient-centered decision-making and ethical considerations. Though the benefit is often short, they may improve the quality of life for highly selected patients. Risks such as adverse reactions and resource allocation concerns must be considered. Further research is needed to establish evidence-based guidelines and standardized assessment tools to evaluate transfusion efficacy in this population.

接近生命末期的晚期癌症的红细胞输注:叙述性回顾。
背景:红细胞(RBC)输注通常用于治疗贫血相关症状,如晚期癌症患者的疲劳和呼吸困难。由于缺乏明确的指导方针、潜在风险和伦理考虑,它们在姑息治疗(PC)中的使用仍然存在争议。目的:本综述旨在评价红细胞输注在晚期癌症患者和生命末期患者中的作用。方法与数据来源:在各数据库中综合查阅现有相关文献,结合相关关键词。只考虑了用英语发表的研究。研究结果:在姑息治疗的晚期癌症患者中,贫血影响高达77%的男性和68%的女性。红细胞输注可能会暂时缓解症状,但支持其在姑息性癌症患者中的常规应用的证据尚无定论。研究报告主观反应率从31%到70%不等。结论:红细胞输注在晚期癌症和临终关怀中应逐案考虑,优先考虑以患者为中心的决策和伦理考虑。虽然效果通常很短,但它们可能会改善某些特定患者的生活质量。必须考虑不良反应和资源分配等风险。需要进一步的研究来建立基于证据的指南和标准化的评估工具来评估这一人群的输血疗效。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMJ Supportive & Palliative Care
BMJ Supportive & Palliative Care Medicine-Medicine (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
7.40%
发文量
170
期刊介绍: Published quarterly in print and continuously online, BMJ Supportive & Palliative Care aims to connect many disciplines and specialties throughout the world by providing high quality, clinically relevant research, reviews, comment, information and news of international importance. We hold an inclusive view of supportive and palliative care research and we are able to call on expertise to critique the whole range of methodologies within the subject, including those working in transitional research, clinical trials, epidemiology, behavioural sciences, ethics and health service research. Articles with relevance to clinical practice and clinical service development will be considered for publication. In an international context, many different categories of clinician and healthcare workers do clinical work associated with palliative medicine, specialist or generalist palliative care, supportive care, psychosocial-oncology and end of life care. We wish to engage many specialties, not only those traditionally associated with supportive and palliative care. We hope to extend the readership to doctors, nurses, other healthcare workers and researchers in medical and surgical specialties, including but not limited to cardiology, gastroenterology, geriatrics, neurology, oncology, paediatrics, primary care, psychiatry, psychology, renal medicine, respiratory medicine.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信