Machine learning in gastrointestinal endoscopy: challenges and opportunities.

IF 2.9 Q2 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
Sergejs Lobanovs, Jekaterina Aleksejeva, Alise Kitija Rūtiņa, Eduards Krustiņš, Jurijs Čižovs, Dmitrijs Bļizņuks
{"title":"Machine learning in gastrointestinal endoscopy: challenges and opportunities.","authors":"Sergejs Lobanovs, Jekaterina Aleksejeva, Alise Kitija Rūtiņa, Eduards Krustiņš, Jurijs Čižovs, Dmitrijs Bļizņuks","doi":"10.1136/bmjgast-2025-001923","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The integration of machine learning (ML) into medical diagnostics has significantly advanced endoscopic examinations for gastrointestinal diseases. By leveraging extensive datasets and sophisticated algorithms, ML technologies enhance diagnostic precision, detect subtle abnormalities, classify diverse pathologies and predict disease progression. However, their widespread adoption is hindered by the inherent heterogeneity of gastrointestinal diseases, technical limitations, limited generalisability across different populations and ethical challenges related to patient privacy, data security and algorithmic bias.This review provides a comprehensive structural analysis of ML approaches in endoscopy, starting with an overview of the classical endoscopic methodology that relies on direct visualisation of the gastrointestinal tract for diagnosis and therapeutic interventions. Then, current ML applications that hold promise for reducing physician-dependent variability, improving diagnostic accuracy and streamlining procedural workflows were explored. Despite these advances, the effectiveness of ML models often remains constrained by the quality and diversity of training data, which can undermine both reliability and generalisability.Ethical considerations - such as safeguarding patient information, upholding data security and mitigating biases embedded in algorithms - are integral to responsibly deploying ML in clinical settings. By examining these technical and ethical barriers, this work contributes to the evolving discourse on integrating advanced ML techniques into gastroenterology. Ultimately, our goal is to pave the way for more effective and reliable ML-driven endoscopic practices that will enhance disease detection, optimise patient care and benefit healthcare providers worldwide.</p>","PeriodicalId":9235,"journal":{"name":"BMJ Open Gastroenterology","volume":"12 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12496122/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMJ Open Gastroenterology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjgast-2025-001923","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The integration of machine learning (ML) into medical diagnostics has significantly advanced endoscopic examinations for gastrointestinal diseases. By leveraging extensive datasets and sophisticated algorithms, ML technologies enhance diagnostic precision, detect subtle abnormalities, classify diverse pathologies and predict disease progression. However, their widespread adoption is hindered by the inherent heterogeneity of gastrointestinal diseases, technical limitations, limited generalisability across different populations and ethical challenges related to patient privacy, data security and algorithmic bias.This review provides a comprehensive structural analysis of ML approaches in endoscopy, starting with an overview of the classical endoscopic methodology that relies on direct visualisation of the gastrointestinal tract for diagnosis and therapeutic interventions. Then, current ML applications that hold promise for reducing physician-dependent variability, improving diagnostic accuracy and streamlining procedural workflows were explored. Despite these advances, the effectiveness of ML models often remains constrained by the quality and diversity of training data, which can undermine both reliability and generalisability.Ethical considerations - such as safeguarding patient information, upholding data security and mitigating biases embedded in algorithms - are integral to responsibly deploying ML in clinical settings. By examining these technical and ethical barriers, this work contributes to the evolving discourse on integrating advanced ML techniques into gastroenterology. Ultimately, our goal is to pave the way for more effective and reliable ML-driven endoscopic practices that will enhance disease detection, optimise patient care and benefit healthcare providers worldwide.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

胃肠内窥镜中的机器学习:挑战与机遇。
将机器学习(ML)集成到医学诊断中,大大提高了胃肠道疾病的内窥镜检查。通过利用广泛的数据集和复杂的算法,机器学习技术提高了诊断精度,检测细微的异常,分类不同的病理和预测疾病进展。然而,胃肠道疾病的固有异质性、技术限制、不同人群的有限通用性以及与患者隐私、数据安全和算法偏见相关的伦理挑战阻碍了它们的广泛采用。本文综述了内窥镜中ML入路的全面结构分析,首先概述了经典的内窥镜方法,该方法依赖于胃肠道的直接可视化来进行诊断和治疗干预。然后,探讨了目前有望减少医生依赖的可变性、提高诊断准确性和简化程序工作流程的ML应用程序。尽管取得了这些进步,但机器学习模型的有效性仍然受到训练数据的质量和多样性的限制,这可能会破坏可靠性和通用性。伦理方面的考虑——比如保护患者信息、维护数据安全和减轻算法中的偏见——是在临床环境中负责任地部署机器学习所不可或缺的。通过检查这些技术和伦理障碍,这项工作有助于将先进的机器学习技术整合到胃肠病学中。最终,我们的目标是为更有效和可靠的ml驱动内窥镜实践铺平道路,这将增强疾病检测,优化患者护理并使全球医疗保健提供者受益。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMJ Open Gastroenterology
BMJ Open Gastroenterology GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY-
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
3.20%
发文量
68
审稿时长
2 weeks
期刊介绍: BMJ Open Gastroenterology is an online-only, peer-reviewed, open access gastroenterology journal, dedicated to publishing high-quality medical research from all disciplines and therapeutic areas of gastroenterology. It is the open access companion journal of Gut and is co-owned by the British Society of Gastroenterology. The journal publishes all research study types, from study protocols to phase I trials to meta-analyses, including small or specialist studies. Publishing procedures are built around continuous publication, publishing research online as soon as the article is ready.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信