Machine learning-based prediction of luminal breast cancer subtypes using polarised light microscopy.

IF 6.8 1区 医学 Q1 ONCOLOGY
Kseniia Tumanova, Mohammadali Khorasani, Sharon Nofech-Mozes, Alex Vitkin
{"title":"Machine learning-based prediction of luminal breast cancer subtypes using polarised light microscopy.","authors":"Kseniia Tumanova, Mohammadali Khorasani, Sharon Nofech-Mozes, Alex Vitkin","doi":"10.1038/s41416-025-03150-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Routine histopathology cannot distinguish between clinically diverse luminal A and B breast cancer subtypes (LBCS), often requiring ancillary testing. Mueller matrix polarimetry (MMP) offers a promising approach by analysing polarised light interactions with complex breast tissues. This study explores the efficacy of using MMP for luminal subtype differentiation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We analysed 30 polarimetric and 7 clinical parameters from 116 unstained breast core biopsies, LBCS classified using the BluePrint® molecular assay. These features were used to train various machine learning models: logistic regression, linear discriminant analysis, support vector machine, random forest, and XGBoost to distinguish luminal subtypes. Receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC) analysis was used to each to assess diagnostic performance using area under the curve, accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Using the top six most prognostic polarimetric (three) and clinical (three) biomarkers ranked by feature importance, the best-performing random forest model achieved an accuracy of 81% (area under ROC = 86%), with both sensitivity and specificity at 75% on an unseen test set, indicating moderately promising, clinically informative performance.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>MMP, particularly its selected Mueller matrix elements, combined with clinical biomarkers show promise in distinguishing LBCS as validated against BluePrint®. By detecting subtle differences in tissue morphology, this approach may enhance breast cancer prognosis and help guide treatment decisions.</p>","PeriodicalId":9243,"journal":{"name":"British Journal of Cancer","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British Journal of Cancer","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41416-025-03150-x","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Routine histopathology cannot distinguish between clinically diverse luminal A and B breast cancer subtypes (LBCS), often requiring ancillary testing. Mueller matrix polarimetry (MMP) offers a promising approach by analysing polarised light interactions with complex breast tissues. This study explores the efficacy of using MMP for luminal subtype differentiation.

Methods: We analysed 30 polarimetric and 7 clinical parameters from 116 unstained breast core biopsies, LBCS classified using the BluePrint® molecular assay. These features were used to train various machine learning models: logistic regression, linear discriminant analysis, support vector machine, random forest, and XGBoost to distinguish luminal subtypes. Receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC) analysis was used to each to assess diagnostic performance using area under the curve, accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity.

Results: Using the top six most prognostic polarimetric (three) and clinical (three) biomarkers ranked by feature importance, the best-performing random forest model achieved an accuracy of 81% (area under ROC = 86%), with both sensitivity and specificity at 75% on an unseen test set, indicating moderately promising, clinically informative performance.

Conclusions: MMP, particularly its selected Mueller matrix elements, combined with clinical biomarkers show promise in distinguishing LBCS as validated against BluePrint®. By detecting subtle differences in tissue morphology, this approach may enhance breast cancer prognosis and help guide treatment decisions.

偏光显微镜下基于机器学习的腔内乳腺癌亚型预测。
背景:常规组织病理学不能区分临床不同的腔内A和B乳腺癌亚型(LBCS),通常需要辅助检测。穆勒矩阵偏振法(MMP)通过分析偏振光与复杂乳腺组织的相互作用提供了一种很有前途的方法。本研究探讨了MMP在管腔亚型分化中的作用。方法:我们分析了116例未染色的乳腺核心活检的30个极化参数和7个临床参数,LBCS采用BluePrint®分子测定法进行分类。这些特征被用来训练各种机器学习模型:逻辑回归、线性判别分析、支持向量机、随机森林和XGBoost来区分luminal亚型。采用受试者工作特征曲线(ROC)分析,以曲线下面积、准确性、敏感性和特异性评估诊断效果。结果:使用按特征重要性排序的前六个最具预后的极化(三个)和临床(三个)生物标志物,表现最好的随机森林模型达到了81%的准确性(ROC下面积= 86%),在未见的测试集上灵敏度和特异性均为75%,表明中度有希望的临床信息表现。结论:MMP,特别是其精选的Mueller基质元素,结合临床生物标志物,在鉴别LBCS方面显示出前景。通过检测组织形态的细微差异,这种方法可以提高乳腺癌的预后,并有助于指导治疗决策。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
British Journal of Cancer
British Journal of Cancer 医学-肿瘤学
CiteScore
15.10
自引率
1.10%
发文量
383
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: The British Journal of Cancer is one of the most-cited general cancer journals, publishing significant advances in translational and clinical cancer research.It also publishes high-quality reviews and thought-provoking comment on all aspects of cancer prevention,diagnosis and treatment.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信