Altering physician referral practices is challenging, but not impossible: spine assessment clinic quality improvement study.

IF 1.6 Q4 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Aaron Varga, Florence Slomp, Vanessa Ritchie, Linda Slater-Maclean, Emily Thiessen, Aaron Hockley
{"title":"Altering physician referral practices is challenging, but not impossible: spine assessment clinic quality improvement study.","authors":"Aaron Varga, Florence Slomp, Vanessa Ritchie, Linda Slater-Maclean, Emily Thiessen, Aaron Hockley","doi":"10.1136/bmjoq-2024-002774","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Access to medical specialists is a persistent challenge, with neurosurgical spine services reporting some of the longest waits across all fields. Inappropriate and incomplete referrals contribute to delayed access to these providers. Referral guidelines and physician education have been shown to decrease such inefficiencies. Therefore, the goal of this study was to address inappropriate referrals directed to the neurosurgical spine assessment clinic via implementation of a quality improvement initiative. We hypothesised that appropriate referrals, which included patients with potential surgical pathology and fulfilled referral criteria, would increase by 25% following referral guideline distribution.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A three-phase study was implemented: (1) baseline data were collected from preintervention referrals by noting the reason for consultation and if certain information, deemed relevant for an appropriate referral, was included; (2) a referral guideline, outlining when and how to refer, was distributed to family physicians in the region; and (3) postintervention referrals were collected and analysed as in phase I.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 404 referrals were collected (161 pre-intervention and 243 post-intervention). A 36% increase in patients who were deemed appropriate surgical candidates was reported post-intervention (p=0.044), with an escalation in the proportion of patients requiring neurosurgeon assessment observed over time. Limited improvements were appreciated in the presence of the criteria indicated for inclusion in a referral document.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>While challenges remain when attempting to modify the referring behaviours of primary care physicians, this research has demonstrated that guidelines aimed at enhancing specialist directed referrals can lead to improvements in their performance. Nonetheless, translating guidelines into practice is a recognised issue, often requiring time and multiple exposures. Active forms of medical education and multifaceted interventions have been demonstrated to be the most effective means of implementing guidelines into practice, an approach that could further address referral inadequacies in the future.</p>","PeriodicalId":9052,"journal":{"name":"BMJ Open Quality","volume":"14 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12496095/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMJ Open Quality","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjoq-2024-002774","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Access to medical specialists is a persistent challenge, with neurosurgical spine services reporting some of the longest waits across all fields. Inappropriate and incomplete referrals contribute to delayed access to these providers. Referral guidelines and physician education have been shown to decrease such inefficiencies. Therefore, the goal of this study was to address inappropriate referrals directed to the neurosurgical spine assessment clinic via implementation of a quality improvement initiative. We hypothesised that appropriate referrals, which included patients with potential surgical pathology and fulfilled referral criteria, would increase by 25% following referral guideline distribution.

Methods: A three-phase study was implemented: (1) baseline data were collected from preintervention referrals by noting the reason for consultation and if certain information, deemed relevant for an appropriate referral, was included; (2) a referral guideline, outlining when and how to refer, was distributed to family physicians in the region; and (3) postintervention referrals were collected and analysed as in phase I.

Results: A total of 404 referrals were collected (161 pre-intervention and 243 post-intervention). A 36% increase in patients who were deemed appropriate surgical candidates was reported post-intervention (p=0.044), with an escalation in the proportion of patients requiring neurosurgeon assessment observed over time. Limited improvements were appreciated in the presence of the criteria indicated for inclusion in a referral document.

Conclusion: While challenges remain when attempting to modify the referring behaviours of primary care physicians, this research has demonstrated that guidelines aimed at enhancing specialist directed referrals can lead to improvements in their performance. Nonetheless, translating guidelines into practice is a recognised issue, often requiring time and multiple exposures. Active forms of medical education and multifaceted interventions have been demonstrated to be the most effective means of implementing guidelines into practice, an approach that could further address referral inadequacies in the future.

改变医生转诊做法具有挑战性,但并非不可能:脊柱评估临床质量改善研究。
导读:获得医学专家是一个持续的挑战,神经外科脊柱服务报告一些最长的等待在所有领域。不适当和不完整的转诊导致延迟获得这些提供者。转诊指南和医生教育已被证明可以降低这种低效率。因此,本研究的目的是通过实施质量改进计划来解决神经外科脊柱评估诊所的不适当转诊问题。我们假设适当的转诊,包括潜在的外科病理和满足转诊标准的患者,将增加25%的转诊指南分布。方法:实施了一项三期研究:(1)通过注意咨询的原因以及是否包括某些被认为与适当转诊相关的信息,从干预前转诊中收集基线数据;(2)向该地区的家庭医生分发了一份转诊指南,概述了何时以及如何转诊;(3)与第一阶段一样收集和分析干预后的转诊病例。结果:共收集到404例转诊病例(干预前161例,干预后243例)。干预后被认为适合手术的患者增加了36% (p=0.044),随着时间的推移,需要神经外科医生评估的患者比例也在上升。由于有列入转诊文件的标准,因此得到了有限的改进。结论:当试图改变初级保健医生的转诊行为时,挑战仍然存在,本研究表明,旨在加强专家定向转诊的指南可以改善他们的表现。然而,将指导方针转化为实践是一个公认的问题,通常需要时间和多次接触。积极的医学教育形式和多方面的干预已被证明是将指导方针付诸实践的最有效手段,这种方法可以进一步解决今后转诊不足的问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMJ Open Quality
BMJ Open Quality Nursing-Leadership and Management
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
226
审稿时长
20 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信