Examination of Resource Utilization and Adverse Outcomes Among Isolated Traumatic Brain Injury Patients Using Modified Brain Injury Guidelines.

IF 0.9 4区 医学 Q3 SURGERY
Erica Dobbs, Gaige Wilder, Damayanti Samanta, Chisom Maduakonam, Brandon Radow
{"title":"Examination of Resource Utilization and Adverse Outcomes Among Isolated Traumatic Brain Injury Patients Using Modified Brain Injury Guidelines.","authors":"Erica Dobbs, Gaige Wilder, Damayanti Samanta, Chisom Maduakonam, Brandon Radow","doi":"10.1177/00031348251381621","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>BackgroundMild traumatic brain injuries (TBI) are often overmanaged, resulting in an inefficient use of time and resources. The Brain Injury Guidelines was developed and subsequently improved as the modified Brain Injury Guidelines (mBIG) to help standardize TBI management. This study evaluates how adopting the mBIG criteria could improve TBI management at our institution.Materials and MethodsThis retrospective observational study included patients aged 18 to 89 admitted for isolated TBI to our Level 1 trauma center ICU between January 2021 and December 2023. Patients were categorized into 3 groups using the mBIG guidelines-mBIG 1, 2, and 3; mBIG 3 were excluded. Data were collected through the institutional trauma registry and chart review.ResultsThe study included 46 mBIG 1 and 44 mBIG 2 patients, who were comparable in terms of characteristics, clinical presentation, and procedures. Both groups had similar clinical outcomes, including in-hospital complications, mortality, discharge disposition, and 30-day readmission, and utilized hospital resources. All patients had a neurosurgery consult, with 49 repeat head CTs in the mBIG 1 group and 50 in the mBIG 2 group. The total combined cost for repeat head computer tomography (RHCTs) scans, magnetic resonance imaging (MRIs), computed tomography angiography (CTAs), neurosurgical consultations, and ICU stay in both groups was $337,637.4.DiscussionThe overutilization of imaging, ICU admissions, and neurosurgeon consultations can strain institutional resources and may not benefit patients with mild TBI. By adopting the mBIG criteria, institutions can implement a more efficient and safe management strategy, allowing these valuable resources to be better allocated to more severely injured patients who require them.</p>","PeriodicalId":7782,"journal":{"name":"American Surgeon","volume":" ","pages":"31348251381621"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Surgeon","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00031348251381621","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

BackgroundMild traumatic brain injuries (TBI) are often overmanaged, resulting in an inefficient use of time and resources. The Brain Injury Guidelines was developed and subsequently improved as the modified Brain Injury Guidelines (mBIG) to help standardize TBI management. This study evaluates how adopting the mBIG criteria could improve TBI management at our institution.Materials and MethodsThis retrospective observational study included patients aged 18 to 89 admitted for isolated TBI to our Level 1 trauma center ICU between January 2021 and December 2023. Patients were categorized into 3 groups using the mBIG guidelines-mBIG 1, 2, and 3; mBIG 3 were excluded. Data were collected through the institutional trauma registry and chart review.ResultsThe study included 46 mBIG 1 and 44 mBIG 2 patients, who were comparable in terms of characteristics, clinical presentation, and procedures. Both groups had similar clinical outcomes, including in-hospital complications, mortality, discharge disposition, and 30-day readmission, and utilized hospital resources. All patients had a neurosurgery consult, with 49 repeat head CTs in the mBIG 1 group and 50 in the mBIG 2 group. The total combined cost for repeat head computer tomography (RHCTs) scans, magnetic resonance imaging (MRIs), computed tomography angiography (CTAs), neurosurgical consultations, and ICU stay in both groups was $337,637.4.DiscussionThe overutilization of imaging, ICU admissions, and neurosurgeon consultations can strain institutional resources and may not benefit patients with mild TBI. By adopting the mBIG criteria, institutions can implement a more efficient and safe management strategy, allowing these valuable resources to be better allocated to more severely injured patients who require them.

使用改进的脑损伤指南检查孤立性创伤性脑损伤患者的资源利用和不良结局。
背景:轻度创伤性脑损伤(TBI)往往被过度管理,导致时间和资源的低效利用。制定了脑损伤指南,并随后改进为修改后的脑损伤指南(mBIG),以帮助标准化TBI管理。本研究评估了采用mBIG标准如何改善我们机构的TBI管理。材料和方法本回顾性观察性研究纳入了2021年1月至2023年12月在我院一级创伤中心ICU收治的18至89岁的孤立性TBI患者。使用mBIG指南将患者分为3组:mBIG 1、2和3;mBIG 3被排除在外。通过机构创伤登记和图表审查收集数据。结果该研究包括46例mBIG 1和44例mBIG 2患者,他们在特征、临床表现和手术方面具有可比性。两组的临床结果相似,包括院内并发症、死亡率、出院情况、30天再入院情况和医院资源利用情况。所有患者都进行了神经外科咨询,mBIG 1组有49例重复头部ct, mBIG 2组有50例。两组重复头部计算机断层扫描(rhct)、磁共振成像(mri)、计算机断层血管造影(cta)、神经外科会诊和ICU住院的总费用为337,637.4美元。过度使用影像学、ICU住院和神经外科医生会诊会使机构资源紧张,可能不利于轻度TBI患者。通过采用mBIG标准,医疗机构可以实施更有效和安全的管理策略,使这些宝贵的资源能够更好地分配给更需要的严重受伤患者。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
American Surgeon
American Surgeon 医学-外科
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
623
期刊介绍: The American Surgeon is a monthly peer-reviewed publication published by the Southeastern Surgical Congress. Its area of concentration is clinical general surgery, as defined by the content areas of the American Board of Surgery: alimentary tract (including bariatric surgery), abdomen and its contents, breast, skin and soft tissue, endocrine system, solid organ transplantation, pediatric surgery, surgical critical care, surgical oncology (including head and neck surgery), trauma and emergency surgery, and vascular surgery.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信