MID-TERM RESULTS OF SURGICAL DEBRANCHING FOR AORTIC ARCH ENDOVASCULAR REPAIR.

IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q3 PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE
Paolo Spath, Stefania Caputo, Enrico Gallitto, Antonino DI Leo, Gemmi Sufali, Rodolfo Pini, Andrea Vacirca, Gianluca Faggioli, Mauro Gargiulo
{"title":"MID-TERM RESULTS OF SURGICAL DEBRANCHING FOR AORTIC ARCH ENDOVASCULAR REPAIR.","authors":"Paolo Spath, Stefania Caputo, Enrico Gallitto, Antonino DI Leo, Gemmi Sufali, Rodolfo Pini, Andrea Vacirca, Gianluca Faggioli, Mauro Gargiulo","doi":"10.1016/j.avsg.2025.09.042","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>To evaluate the outcomes of surgical debranching of supra-aortic trunks(dSAT) for the endovascular treatment of aortic arch pathologies.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Single-center retrospective analysis (2014-2024) of patients undergoing dSAT associated with endovascular treatment involving thoracic endovascular repair (TEVAR) in the aortic arch, was performed. Primary endpoints were defined on dSAT; secondary endpoints on patients. Subgroup analyses considered dSAT combined vs deferred to endovascular procedure. Cross-table analysis was performed for categorial variables and Kaplan-Meier for follow-up analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Eighty-two patients (mean age:71, 78% male), were included. Pathologies included aortic arch(24%) and thoracic/thoracoabdominal(76%) diseases. A total of 87 dSAT were performed: a left common carotid artery(LCCA)-left subclavian artery(LSA) bypass in 57(70%) cases, a right-common carotid artery to LSA with reimplant of LCCA in 18(22%), bilateral carotid-subclavian bypasses in 5(6%), two(2%) direct reimplants(LCCA; vertebral artery). Seventy patients(85%) had a single and 12(15%) had a deferred endovascular repair. Technical success was 100%. 30-days dSAT related reinterventions were 7(8%)(one arterial dissection and 6 bleedings). Non-surgical dSAT complications were 4(5%)(3 left vocal cord paralysis; 1 chylothorax). Thirty-day mortality was 8%(7 patients), unrelated to dSAT. No cases of stroke were reported. Subgroup analysis showed absence of debranching related complications/reinterventions in deferred group. Median follow-up 20 months(IQR10-37). Follow-up debranching primary patency was 100% without reinterventions.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The dSAT is a safe and effective procedure for endovascular treatment of aortic pathologies involving the aortic arch. Patency is high and reinterventions/complications are mainly linked to bleedings and seem to have a positive trend when endovascular procedure is performed in deferred stage.</p>","PeriodicalId":8061,"journal":{"name":"Annals of vascular surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of vascular surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.avsg.2025.09.042","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: To evaluate the outcomes of surgical debranching of supra-aortic trunks(dSAT) for the endovascular treatment of aortic arch pathologies.

Methods: Single-center retrospective analysis (2014-2024) of patients undergoing dSAT associated with endovascular treatment involving thoracic endovascular repair (TEVAR) in the aortic arch, was performed. Primary endpoints were defined on dSAT; secondary endpoints on patients. Subgroup analyses considered dSAT combined vs deferred to endovascular procedure. Cross-table analysis was performed for categorial variables and Kaplan-Meier for follow-up analysis.

Results: Eighty-two patients (mean age:71, 78% male), were included. Pathologies included aortic arch(24%) and thoracic/thoracoabdominal(76%) diseases. A total of 87 dSAT were performed: a left common carotid artery(LCCA)-left subclavian artery(LSA) bypass in 57(70%) cases, a right-common carotid artery to LSA with reimplant of LCCA in 18(22%), bilateral carotid-subclavian bypasses in 5(6%), two(2%) direct reimplants(LCCA; vertebral artery). Seventy patients(85%) had a single and 12(15%) had a deferred endovascular repair. Technical success was 100%. 30-days dSAT related reinterventions were 7(8%)(one arterial dissection and 6 bleedings). Non-surgical dSAT complications were 4(5%)(3 left vocal cord paralysis; 1 chylothorax). Thirty-day mortality was 8%(7 patients), unrelated to dSAT. No cases of stroke were reported. Subgroup analysis showed absence of debranching related complications/reinterventions in deferred group. Median follow-up 20 months(IQR10-37). Follow-up debranching primary patency was 100% without reinterventions.

Conclusions: The dSAT is a safe and effective procedure for endovascular treatment of aortic pathologies involving the aortic arch. Patency is high and reinterventions/complications are mainly linked to bleedings and seem to have a positive trend when endovascular procedure is performed in deferred stage.

主动脉弓血管内修复手术去分支的中期结果。
前言:评价主动脉上干手术去分支(dSAT)在血管内治疗主动脉弓病变中的效果。方法:对2014-2024年接受dSAT相关血管内治疗的主动脉弓胸椎血管内修复(TEVAR)患者进行单中心回顾性分析。主要终点在dSAT上定义;次要终点是患者。亚组分析考虑dSAT联合或延迟血管内手术。分类变量采用交叉表分析,随访分析采用Kaplan-Meier分析。结果:共纳入82例患者,平均年龄71岁,其中男性78%。病理包括主动脉弓(24%)和胸/胸腹(76%)疾病。共进行了87例dSAT手术:左侧颈总动脉(LCCA)-左侧锁骨下动脉(LSA)旁路57例(70%),右侧颈总动脉- LSA再植入LCCA 18例(22%),双侧颈-锁骨下旁路5例(6%),2例(2%)直接再植入术(LCCA;椎动脉)。70例(85%)患者进行了一次血管内修复,12例(15%)患者进行了延期血管内修复。技术上的成功率是100%。30天dSAT相关再干预7例(8%)(1例动脉夹层和6例出血)。非手术dSAT并发症4例(5%),其中左声带麻痹3例,乳糜胸1例。30天死亡率为8%(7例),与dSAT无关。没有中风病例报告。亚组分析显示,延期组无脱支相关并发症/再干预。中位随访20个月(IQR10-37)。随访去分支原发通畅100%,无再干预。结论:dSAT是血管内治疗累及主动脉弓的主动脉病变安全有效的方法。通畅度高,再干预/并发症主要与出血有关,当血管内手术在延迟阶段进行时,似乎有积极的趋势。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
13.30%
发文量
603
审稿时长
50 days
期刊介绍: Annals of Vascular Surgery, published eight times a year, invites original manuscripts reporting clinical and experimental work in vascular surgery for peer review. Articles may be submitted for the following sections of the journal: Clinical Research (reports of clinical series, new drug or medical device trials) Basic Science Research (new investigations, experimental work) Case Reports (reports on a limited series of patients) General Reviews (scholarly review of the existing literature on a relevant topic) Developments in Endovascular and Endoscopic Surgery Selected Techniques (technical maneuvers) Historical Notes (interesting vignettes from the early days of vascular surgery) Editorials/Correspondence
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信