Anti-Phosphatidylserine/Prothrombin Antibodies Identify a Distinct Form of ITP

IF 1.2
EJHaem Pub Date : 2025-10-04 DOI:10.1002/jha2.70154
Sofia Camerlo, Massimo Radin, Giorgio Rosati, Melissa Padrini, Barbara Montaruli, Isabella Russo, Cristina Barale, Alice Barinotti, Irene Cecchi, David Galarza, Fulvio Pomero, Marco De Gobbi, Savino Sciascia, Alessandro Morotti
{"title":"Anti-Phosphatidylserine/Prothrombin Antibodies Identify a Distinct Form of ITP","authors":"Sofia Camerlo,&nbsp;Massimo Radin,&nbsp;Giorgio Rosati,&nbsp;Melissa Padrini,&nbsp;Barbara Montaruli,&nbsp;Isabella Russo,&nbsp;Cristina Barale,&nbsp;Alice Barinotti,&nbsp;Irene Cecchi,&nbsp;David Galarza,&nbsp;Fulvio Pomero,&nbsp;Marco De Gobbi,&nbsp;Savino Sciascia,&nbsp;Alessandro Morotti","doi":"10.1002/jha2.70154","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Introduction</h3>\n \n <p>Immune thrombocytopenia (ITP) and antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) are distinct autoimmune disorders with clinical intersections. While APS is marked by thrombosis and pregnancy complications, ITP typically presents as isolated low platelet counts with bleeding risk. Thrombocytopenia can also occur in APS, and a subset of ITP patients test positive for antiphospholipid antibodies (aPL).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Discussion</h3>\n \n <p>This study examined aPL in 90 ITP patients and compared them to 132 APS patients. Among the ITP group, 18.3% were aPL-positive, with lupus anticoagulant most common; 12% had anti-phosphatidylserine/prothrombin (aPS/PT) antibodies. In the APS cohort, 16% exhibited thrombocytopenia (&lt; 100,000/µL), with a mean platelet count of 44,000/µL, and 71% of these were positive for aPS/PT. Platelet levels varied significantly among ITP aPL-negative, ITP aPL-positive and APS-ITP groups (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.001). aPL positivity was linked to less severe thrombocytopenia but affected treatment approaches, showing differences in first-line (<i>p</i> = 0.034) and second-line (<i>p</i> = 0.025) therapies. Patients with ITP secondary to APS had a higher mean platelet count compared to aPL-positive ITP patients and aPL-negative ITP patients.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>Screening for aPL and aPS/PT is vital to identify an ITP subset with milder thrombocytopenia and increased thrombotic risk, and may guide therapeutic decisions such as between thrombopoietin receptor agonists and SYK inhibitor.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Trial Registration</h3>\n \n <p>The authors have confirmed clinical trial registration is not needed for this submission.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":72883,"journal":{"name":"EJHaem","volume":"6 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/jha2.70154","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"EJHaem","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jha2.70154","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

Immune thrombocytopenia (ITP) and antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) are distinct autoimmune disorders with clinical intersections. While APS is marked by thrombosis and pregnancy complications, ITP typically presents as isolated low platelet counts with bleeding risk. Thrombocytopenia can also occur in APS, and a subset of ITP patients test positive for antiphospholipid antibodies (aPL).

Discussion

This study examined aPL in 90 ITP patients and compared them to 132 APS patients. Among the ITP group, 18.3% were aPL-positive, with lupus anticoagulant most common; 12% had anti-phosphatidylserine/prothrombin (aPS/PT) antibodies. In the APS cohort, 16% exhibited thrombocytopenia (< 100,000/µL), with a mean platelet count of 44,000/µL, and 71% of these were positive for aPS/PT. Platelet levels varied significantly among ITP aPL-negative, ITP aPL-positive and APS-ITP groups (p < 0.001). aPL positivity was linked to less severe thrombocytopenia but affected treatment approaches, showing differences in first-line (p = 0.034) and second-line (p = 0.025) therapies. Patients with ITP secondary to APS had a higher mean platelet count compared to aPL-positive ITP patients and aPL-negative ITP patients.

Conclusion

Screening for aPL and aPS/PT is vital to identify an ITP subset with milder thrombocytopenia and increased thrombotic risk, and may guide therapeutic decisions such as between thrombopoietin receptor agonists and SYK inhibitor.

Trial Registration

The authors have confirmed clinical trial registration is not needed for this submission.

Abstract Image

抗磷脂酰丝氨酸/凝血酶原抗体鉴定ITP的独特形式
免疫性血小板减少症(ITP)和抗磷脂综合征(APS)是两种不同的自身免疫性疾病,具有临床交叉点。APS的特点是血栓形成和妊娠并发症,而ITP通常表现为孤立的低血小板计数和出血风险。血小板减少症也可发生在APS中,一部分ITP患者抗磷脂抗体(aPL)检测呈阳性。本研究检测了90例ITP患者的aPL,并将其与132例APS患者进行了比较。ITP组apl阳性占18.3%,以狼疮抗凝药最为常见;12%有抗磷脂酰丝氨酸/凝血酶原(aPS/PT)抗体。在APS队列中,16%表现为血小板减少(100,000/µL),平均血小板计数为44,000/µL,其中71%为APS /PT阳性。血小板水平在ITP apl阴性、ITP apl阳性和APS-ITP组间差异有统计学意义(p < 0.001)。aPL阳性与不太严重的血小板减少症有关,但影响治疗方法,显示一线(p = 0.034)和二线(p = 0.025)治疗的差异。与apl阳性ITP患者和apl阴性ITP患者相比,APS继发ITP患者的平均血小板计数更高。结论:筛选aPL和aPS/PT对于鉴别具有较轻血小板减少症和血栓形成风险增加的ITP亚群至关重要,并可能指导诸如血小板生成素受体激动剂和SYK抑制剂之间的治疗决策。试验注册作者已确认该提交不需要临床试验注册。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信