Comparative analysis of machine learning algorithms and vegetation indices for mapping Eucalyptus tree woodlots using Sentinel-2 imagery in the Akaki River catchments

IF 1.5 Q3 AGRONOMY
Hailegebreal Tamirat, Meron Tekalign, Mekuria Argaw, Tulu Tolla
{"title":"Comparative analysis of machine learning algorithms and vegetation indices for mapping Eucalyptus tree woodlots using Sentinel-2 imagery in the Akaki River catchments","authors":"Hailegebreal Tamirat,&nbsp;Meron Tekalign,&nbsp;Mekuria Argaw,&nbsp;Tulu Tolla","doi":"10.1002/agg2.70215","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><i>Eucalyptus</i> trees (ETs) cover approximately 20 million ha globally, with Brazil leading at 5.6 million ha. In Africa, ET plantations span around 1.5 million ha, primarily in South Africa and Ethiopia. In Ethiopia, ET plays a key role in agroforestry, covering 506,000 ha, which represents 90% of all planted trees in the form of woodlots. These woodlots, particularly in the Akaki River catchment, are essential for local livelihoods, providing timber, fuelwood, and construction materials. However, while the socioeconomic benefits and ecological effects of ET are well-documented, the spatial distribution of ET across Ethiopia remains underexplored. Furthermore, previous studies have examined machine learning (ML) algorithms and vegetation indices (VIs) separately for identifying tree species, but limited research has compared these methods for mapping specific land features, such as ET distribution. This study aims to address this gap by comparing ML algorithms, including artificial neural networks (ANN), random forest (RF), and support vector machines (SVM), with VIs like the normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI), green optimized soil adjusted vegetation index, green chlorophyll index, and modified soil adjusted vegetation index to map the spatial distribution of <i>Eucalyptus globulus</i> Labill. woodlots using Sentinel-2 imagery. Our results show that RF outperformed other ML techniques with 96.3% overall accuracy (OA) and a 0.93 kappa coefficient (K), while ANN and SVM attained 88.7% and 81.7% OA, respectively. Among the VIs, NDVI was the most reliable, with an OA of 90.7% and a K of 0.887. We conclude that ML algorithms provide a more robust method for mapping specific land features like ET distribution than VIs. Future research should investigate the effects of ET on ecosystem services, incorporating socioeconomic data and advanced ML techniques, such as deep learning, to enhance mapping accuracy.</p>","PeriodicalId":7567,"journal":{"name":"Agrosystems, Geosciences & Environment","volume":"8 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://acsess.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/agg2.70215","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Agrosystems, Geosciences & Environment","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://acsess.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/agg2.70215","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"AGRONOMY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Eucalyptus trees (ETs) cover approximately 20 million ha globally, with Brazil leading at 5.6 million ha. In Africa, ET plantations span around 1.5 million ha, primarily in South Africa and Ethiopia. In Ethiopia, ET plays a key role in agroforestry, covering 506,000 ha, which represents 90% of all planted trees in the form of woodlots. These woodlots, particularly in the Akaki River catchment, are essential for local livelihoods, providing timber, fuelwood, and construction materials. However, while the socioeconomic benefits and ecological effects of ET are well-documented, the spatial distribution of ET across Ethiopia remains underexplored. Furthermore, previous studies have examined machine learning (ML) algorithms and vegetation indices (VIs) separately for identifying tree species, but limited research has compared these methods for mapping specific land features, such as ET distribution. This study aims to address this gap by comparing ML algorithms, including artificial neural networks (ANN), random forest (RF), and support vector machines (SVM), with VIs like the normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI), green optimized soil adjusted vegetation index, green chlorophyll index, and modified soil adjusted vegetation index to map the spatial distribution of Eucalyptus globulus Labill. woodlots using Sentinel-2 imagery. Our results show that RF outperformed other ML techniques with 96.3% overall accuracy (OA) and a 0.93 kappa coefficient (K), while ANN and SVM attained 88.7% and 81.7% OA, respectively. Among the VIs, NDVI was the most reliable, with an OA of 90.7% and a K of 0.887. We conclude that ML algorithms provide a more robust method for mapping specific land features like ET distribution than VIs. Future research should investigate the effects of ET on ecosystem services, incorporating socioeconomic data and advanced ML techniques, such as deep learning, to enhance mapping accuracy.

Abstract Image

基于Sentinel-2影像的赤木河流域桉树林地机器学习算法与植被指数对比分析
全球桉树覆盖面积约为2000万公顷,其中巴西以560万公顷居首位。在非洲,ET种植面积约为150万公顷,主要在南非和埃塞俄比亚。在埃塞俄比亚,ET在农林业中发挥关键作用,覆盖506,000公顷,占所有以林地形式种植的树木的90%。这些林地,特别是赤木河流域的林地,对当地的生计至关重要,提供木材、薪材和建筑材料。然而,尽管ET的社会经济效益和生态效应已被充分证明,但ET在埃塞俄比亚的空间分布仍未得到充分探索。此外,以前的研究已经分别检查了机器学习(ML)算法和植被指数(VIs)来识别树种,但很少有研究将这些方法用于绘制特定的土地特征,如ET分布。本研究旨在通过将人工神经网络(ANN)、随机森林(RF)和支持向量机(SVM)等ML算法与归一化植被差异指数(NDVI)、绿色优化土壤调整植被指数、绿色叶绿素指数和改良土壤调整植被指数等VIs进行比较,来弥补这一空白,绘制蓝桉的空间分布。林地使用哨兵2号图像。我们的研究结果表明,RF以96.3%的总体准确率(OA)和0.93的kappa系数(K)优于其他ML技术,而ANN和SVM分别达到88.7%和81.7%的OA。其中,NDVI最可靠,OA为90.7%,K为0.887。我们的结论是,机器学习算法为绘制ET分布等特定土地特征提供了比VIs更强大的方法。未来的研究应探讨ET对生态系统服务的影响,结合社会经济数据和先进的机器学习技术,如深度学习,以提高绘图精度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Agrosystems, Geosciences & Environment
Agrosystems, Geosciences & Environment Agricultural and Biological Sciences-Agricultural and Biological Sciences (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
80
审稿时长
24 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信