Development of a No-Code Machine Learning Model Builder for Predictive Analytics in Education

IF 2.2 3区 工程技术 Q3 COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS
Mohammed Jibril
{"title":"Development of a No-Code Machine Learning Model Builder for Predictive Analytics in Education","authors":"Mohammed Jibril","doi":"10.1002/cae.70088","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>Machine learning (ML) has the potential to enhance educational predictive analytics, but its adoption is limited by the programming expertise required to develop models. Traditional ML tools require coding skills, which makes them inaccessible to educators and researchers without computational backgrounds. Existing no-code platforms lack affordability and accessibility. This study addresses this gap by developing and validating a no-code ML builder to enable non-programmers to build, evaluate, and deploy ML models. Design and development research approach was adopted in the study. It utilizes Python-based tools such as Streamlit and scikit-learn. The tool underwent expert validation and comparative performance testing against Google Colab using datasets from Kaggle, consisting of 5000 and 2392 student performance records. The results show that the no-code ML builder, which is accessible at nextml.streamlit.app achieved a predictive performance comparable to coded models. A minor performance gap was observed in some algorithms, with Logistic Regression achieving an accuracy of 63.88% compared to 73.28% in Google Colab. Experts in educational technology and computer science rated the tool highly for usability, with mean scores ranging from 4.33 to 4.57. 71% of evaluators found it suitable for educational datasets, and 56% endorsed its ability to handle students' data sets. The study concludes that the tool bridges the accessibility gap in the application of ML in education while maintaining competitive model performance. It recommends that Institutions adopt no-code tools. Future research should focus on incorporating more complex algorithms.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":50643,"journal":{"name":"Computer Applications in Engineering Education","volume":"33 6","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Computer Applications in Engineering Education","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/cae.70088","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Machine learning (ML) has the potential to enhance educational predictive analytics, but its adoption is limited by the programming expertise required to develop models. Traditional ML tools require coding skills, which makes them inaccessible to educators and researchers without computational backgrounds. Existing no-code platforms lack affordability and accessibility. This study addresses this gap by developing and validating a no-code ML builder to enable non-programmers to build, evaluate, and deploy ML models. Design and development research approach was adopted in the study. It utilizes Python-based tools such as Streamlit and scikit-learn. The tool underwent expert validation and comparative performance testing against Google Colab using datasets from Kaggle, consisting of 5000 and 2392 student performance records. The results show that the no-code ML builder, which is accessible at nextml.streamlit.app achieved a predictive performance comparable to coded models. A minor performance gap was observed in some algorithms, with Logistic Regression achieving an accuracy of 63.88% compared to 73.28% in Google Colab. Experts in educational technology and computer science rated the tool highly for usability, with mean scores ranging from 4.33 to 4.57. 71% of evaluators found it suitable for educational datasets, and 56% endorsed its ability to handle students' data sets. The study concludes that the tool bridges the accessibility gap in the application of ML in education while maintaining competitive model performance. It recommends that Institutions adopt no-code tools. Future research should focus on incorporating more complex algorithms.

Abstract Image

用于教育预测分析的无代码机器学习模型构建器的开发
机器学习(ML)具有增强教育预测分析的潜力,但其采用受到开发模型所需的编程专业知识的限制。传统的机器学习工具需要编码技能,这使得没有计算背景的教育工作者和研究人员无法使用它们。现有的无代码平台缺乏可负担性和可访问性。本研究通过开发和验证无代码ML构建器来解决这一差距,使非程序员能够构建、评估和部署ML模型。本研究采用设计开发研究方法。它利用基于python的工具,如Streamlit和scikit-learn。使用Kaggle的数据集(包括5000和2392名学生的成绩记录),该工具与谷歌Colab进行了专家验证和比较性能测试。结果表明,可在nextml.streamlit.app访问的无代码ML构建器实现了与编码模型相当的预测性能。在一些算法中观察到较小的性能差距,逻辑回归实现了63.88%的准确性,而谷歌Colab的准确性为73.28%。教育技术和计算机科学专家对该工具的可用性评价很高,平均得分在4.33到4.57之间。71%的评估者认为它适合教育数据集,56%的评估者认可它处理学生数据集的能力。该研究的结论是,该工具弥合了机器学习在教育应用中的可访问性差距,同时保持了具有竞争力的模型性能。它建议机构采用无代码工具。未来的研究应该集中在整合更复杂的算法上。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Computer Applications in Engineering Education
Computer Applications in Engineering Education 工程技术-工程:综合
CiteScore
7.20
自引率
10.30%
发文量
100
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Computer Applications in Engineering Education provides a forum for publishing peer-reviewed timely information on the innovative uses of computers, Internet, and software tools in engineering education. Besides new courses and software tools, the CAE journal covers areas that support the integration of technology-based modules in the engineering curriculum and promotes discussion of the assessment and dissemination issues associated with these new implementation methods.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信