Uncovering the dark side of failure tolerance: How failure-tolerance policy shapes collaborative innovation networks

IF 10.9 1区 管理学 Q1 ENGINEERING, INDUSTRIAL
Chenliang Li, Zhijian Cui
{"title":"Uncovering the dark side of failure tolerance: How failure-tolerance policy shapes collaborative innovation networks","authors":"Chenliang Li,&nbsp;Zhijian Cui","doi":"10.1016/j.technovation.2025.103380","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Collaborative innovation networks (CINs) are critical for innovation in dynamic emerging markets like China yet failures in such networks are quite common. While recent research has highlighted the beneficial role of failure tolerance for better organizational learning and innovation performance, it has overlooked how external government policies shaping failure tolerance affect innovation networks. This study addresses this gap by examining China's Fault-Tolerance and Error-Correction (FTEC) policy, investigating its impact on CINs' formation and evolution among state-owned enterprises (SOEs). Employing Exponential Random Graph Models (ERGMs) on 15,225 collaborative patents, we uncover paradoxical effects: while FTEC policy enhances repeated collaborations among existing partners, it diminishes the formation of new ties, leading to policy-induced “lock-in” effects and path-dependent network structures. Our findings reveal that FTEC-adopting SOEs' preference for deepening established partnerships is amplified by longer policy implementation durations. Additionally, firms with shared FTEC adoption status or similar policy tenures form distinct collaborative clusters, highlighting the role of policy homophily in reinforcing network closure. These results challenge the assumption of unidirectional benefits from failure-tolerance policies, demonstrating their dual impact: fostering short-term collaborative stability while constraining long-term network adaptability.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":49444,"journal":{"name":"Technovation","volume":"150 ","pages":"Article 103380"},"PeriodicalIF":10.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Technovation","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0166497225002123","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, INDUSTRIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Collaborative innovation networks (CINs) are critical for innovation in dynamic emerging markets like China yet failures in such networks are quite common. While recent research has highlighted the beneficial role of failure tolerance for better organizational learning and innovation performance, it has overlooked how external government policies shaping failure tolerance affect innovation networks. This study addresses this gap by examining China's Fault-Tolerance and Error-Correction (FTEC) policy, investigating its impact on CINs' formation and evolution among state-owned enterprises (SOEs). Employing Exponential Random Graph Models (ERGMs) on 15,225 collaborative patents, we uncover paradoxical effects: while FTEC policy enhances repeated collaborations among existing partners, it diminishes the formation of new ties, leading to policy-induced “lock-in” effects and path-dependent network structures. Our findings reveal that FTEC-adopting SOEs' preference for deepening established partnerships is amplified by longer policy implementation durations. Additionally, firms with shared FTEC adoption status or similar policy tenures form distinct collaborative clusters, highlighting the role of policy homophily in reinforcing network closure. These results challenge the assumption of unidirectional benefits from failure-tolerance policies, demonstrating their dual impact: fostering short-term collaborative stability while constraining long-term network adaptability.
揭露容错的阴暗面:容错政策如何塑造协同创新网络
协同创新网络(CINs)对于像中国这样充满活力的新兴市场的创新至关重要,但这种网络的失败却相当普遍。虽然最近的研究强调了失败容忍对更好的组织学习和创新绩效的有益作用,但它忽略了外部政府政策如何塑造失败容忍影响创新网络。本研究通过分析中国的容错纠错(FTEC)政策,探讨其对国有企业CINs形成和演变的影响,解决了这一空白。利用指数随机图模型(ERGMs)对15,225项合作专利进行分析,我们发现了矛盾的效应:FTEC政策在促进现有合作伙伴之间重复合作的同时,减少了新关系的形成,导致政策诱导的“锁定”效应和路径依赖的网络结构。我们的研究结果表明,采用对外贸易的国有企业对深化既定伙伴关系的偏好被较长的政策实施时间所放大。此外,共享FTEC采用状态或类似政策任期的公司形成了不同的合作集群,突出了政策同质性在加强网络封闭方面的作用。这些结果挑战了容错策略单向收益的假设,展示了它们的双重影响:促进短期协作稳定性,同时限制长期网络适应性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Technovation
Technovation 管理科学-工程:工业
CiteScore
15.10
自引率
11.20%
发文量
208
审稿时长
91 days
期刊介绍: The interdisciplinary journal Technovation covers various aspects of technological innovation, exploring processes, products, and social impacts. It examines innovation in both process and product realms, including social innovations like regulatory frameworks and non-economic benefits. Topics range from emerging trends and capital for development to managing technology-intensive ventures and innovation in organizations of different sizes. It also discusses organizational structures, investment strategies for science and technology enterprises, and the roles of technological innovators. Additionally, it addresses technology transfer between developing countries and innovation across enterprise, political, and economic systems.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信