Impacts of GenAI-assisted collaborative prewriting on university EFL students’ interactions with GenAI, outline quality, and task motivation

IF 5.6 1区 文学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Jun Wang , Kai Guo
{"title":"Impacts of GenAI-assisted collaborative prewriting on university EFL students’ interactions with GenAI, outline quality, and task motivation","authors":"Jun Wang ,&nbsp;Kai Guo","doi":"10.1016/j.system.2025.103857","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The integration of generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) tools in English as a foreign language (EFL) writing instruction has gained significant traction. However, existing research has mainly concentrated on the revision stage of writing, with limited exploration of how GenAI can support students during the prewriting phase, particularly in developing outlines. This study investigated the effects of a novel learning approach—GenAI-assisted collaborative prewriting (GACP)—and conducted a comparative analysis with GenAI-assisted individual prewriting (GAIP). The focus was on students' interactions with GenAI, the quality of their outlines, and their task motivation. Employing a within-subjects design, this study involved sixty-nine Chinese undergraduates. We collected and analyzed multiple data sources, including chat histories between students and a GenAI tool, writing outlines, and post-task questionnaires. The results revealed that students' objectives for using GenAI in outline creation were largely consistent across both conditions, with brainstorming emerging as the most common goal. Notably, peer collaboration was found to facilitate more effective prompts for eliciting desired responses from GenAI and to mitigate potential misuse of the tool. Additionally, GACP led to higher content quality in outline writing, although improvements in organization and language were less pronounced. Furthermore, students in the GACP setting reported greater confidence in their writing outcomes, although no statistically significant differences in overall task motivation were observed. These findings enhance our understanding of GenAI's potential in supporting EFL writing and suggest that collaborative use of GenAI can further enrich student learning experiences.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48185,"journal":{"name":"System","volume":"135 ","pages":"Article 103857"},"PeriodicalIF":5.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"System","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0346251X25002672","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The integration of generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) tools in English as a foreign language (EFL) writing instruction has gained significant traction. However, existing research has mainly concentrated on the revision stage of writing, with limited exploration of how GenAI can support students during the prewriting phase, particularly in developing outlines. This study investigated the effects of a novel learning approach—GenAI-assisted collaborative prewriting (GACP)—and conducted a comparative analysis with GenAI-assisted individual prewriting (GAIP). The focus was on students' interactions with GenAI, the quality of their outlines, and their task motivation. Employing a within-subjects design, this study involved sixty-nine Chinese undergraduates. We collected and analyzed multiple data sources, including chat histories between students and a GenAI tool, writing outlines, and post-task questionnaires. The results revealed that students' objectives for using GenAI in outline creation were largely consistent across both conditions, with brainstorming emerging as the most common goal. Notably, peer collaboration was found to facilitate more effective prompts for eliciting desired responses from GenAI and to mitigate potential misuse of the tool. Additionally, GACP led to higher content quality in outline writing, although improvements in organization and language were less pronounced. Furthermore, students in the GACP setting reported greater confidence in their writing outcomes, although no statistically significant differences in overall task motivation were observed. These findings enhance our understanding of GenAI's potential in supporting EFL writing and suggest that collaborative use of GenAI can further enrich student learning experiences.
GenAI辅助协作预写对大学英语学生与GenAI互动、大纲质量和任务动机的影响
将生成式人工智能(GenAI)工具整合到英语写作教学中已经获得了很大的关注。然而,现有的研究主要集中在写作的修改阶段,对GenAI如何在写作前阶段,特别是在制定大纲方面支持学生的探索有限。本研究调查了一种新的学习方法——基因辅助协同预写(GACP)的效果,并与基因辅助个体预写(GAIP)进行了比较分析。重点是学生与GenAI的互动,他们大纲的质量,以及他们的任务动机。本研究采用受试者内设计,涉及69名中国大学生。我们收集并分析了多个数据源,包括学生与GenAI工具之间的聊天记录、写作大纲和任务后问卷。结果显示,在两种情况下,学生使用GenAI创建大纲的目标在很大程度上是一致的,头脑风暴是最常见的目标。值得注意的是,发现同行协作有助于更有效地提示从GenAI中获得所需的响应,并减轻对该工具的潜在滥用。此外,GACP在大纲写作方面提高了内容质量,尽管在组织和语言方面的改进不太明显。此外,GACP组的学生对他们的写作结果更有信心,尽管在总体任务动机上没有统计学上的显著差异。这些发现增强了我们对GenAI在支持英语写作方面的潜力的理解,并表明协同使用GenAI可以进一步丰富学生的学习经验。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
System
System Multiple-
CiteScore
8.80
自引率
8.30%
发文量
202
审稿时长
64 days
期刊介绍: This international journal is devoted to the applications of educational technology and applied linguistics to problems of foreign language teaching and learning. Attention is paid to all languages and to problems associated with the study and teaching of English as a second or foreign language. The journal serves as a vehicle of expression for colleagues in developing countries. System prefers its contributors to provide articles which have a sound theoretical base with a visible practical application which can be generalized. The review section may take up works of a more theoretical nature to broaden the background.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信