The use of condylar prostheses in head and neck reconstruction

Jeffrey Abdullah, Pradyumna Naredla, Matthew Idle, Prav Praveen, Tim Martin, Sat Parmar
{"title":"The use of condylar prostheses in head and neck reconstruction","authors":"Jeffrey Abdullah,&nbsp;Pradyumna Naredla,&nbsp;Matthew Idle,&nbsp;Prav Praveen,&nbsp;Tim Martin,&nbsp;Sat Parmar","doi":"10.1016/j.adoms.2025.100588","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The replacement and reconstruction of the mandibular condyle following mandibular resection can be achieved with condylar replacement surgery. The aim of this study was to evaluate the clinical outcome of head and neck patients who underwent placement of condylar prostheses as part of their mandibular reconstructive surgery. We retrospectively reviewed 34 head and neck patients who had placement of condylar prostheses between January 01, 2009 to March 01, 2024. The measured outcomes included: patients’ occlusion, facial nerve function and data regarding return to theatres for further surgeries. We identified a total of 35 condylar replacement cases as part of mandibular reconstruction. 18 cases (51.4 %) were for malignant pathology, 17 (48.6 %) were for benign pathology.11 patients (32.4 %) received preoperative radiotherapy. 15 patients (44.1 %) underwent postoperative radiotherapy. 5 cases (14.3 %) required return to theatre post-surgery for partial removal of platework including the condylar component. Satisfactory occlusion was achieved in 25 cases (71.4 %). There were 7 patients with long term (20.6 %) unilateral facial paralysis. 4 patients (11.8 %) developed facial paralysis immediately postoperatively, and 3 patients (8.8 %) had delayed onsets. In 1 patient, the condylar prosthesis eroded through the glenoid fossa but remains asymptomatic. Consideration should be made into investigating a larger patient series, particularly comparing patients who had a condylar prosthesis and those that did not.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":100051,"journal":{"name":"Advances in Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery","volume":"20 ","pages":"Article 100588"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667147625000743","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The replacement and reconstruction of the mandibular condyle following mandibular resection can be achieved with condylar replacement surgery. The aim of this study was to evaluate the clinical outcome of head and neck patients who underwent placement of condylar prostheses as part of their mandibular reconstructive surgery. We retrospectively reviewed 34 head and neck patients who had placement of condylar prostheses between January 01, 2009 to March 01, 2024. The measured outcomes included: patients’ occlusion, facial nerve function and data regarding return to theatres for further surgeries. We identified a total of 35 condylar replacement cases as part of mandibular reconstruction. 18 cases (51.4 %) were for malignant pathology, 17 (48.6 %) were for benign pathology.11 patients (32.4 %) received preoperative radiotherapy. 15 patients (44.1 %) underwent postoperative radiotherapy. 5 cases (14.3 %) required return to theatre post-surgery for partial removal of platework including the condylar component. Satisfactory occlusion was achieved in 25 cases (71.4 %). There were 7 patients with long term (20.6 %) unilateral facial paralysis. 4 patients (11.8 %) developed facial paralysis immediately postoperatively, and 3 patients (8.8 %) had delayed onsets. In 1 patient, the condylar prosthesis eroded through the glenoid fossa but remains asymptomatic. Consideration should be made into investigating a larger patient series, particularly comparing patients who had a condylar prosthesis and those that did not.
髁突假体在头颈部重建术中的应用
下颌骨切除术后髁突的置换和重建可以通过髁突置换手术来实现。本研究的目的是评估头颈部患者接受髁突假体放置作为下颌重建手术的一部分的临床结果。我们回顾性分析了2009年1月1日至2024年3月1日期间放置髁突假体的34例头颈部患者。测量的结果包括:患者的闭塞,面神经功能和关于返回手术室进一步手术的数据。我们确定了35例髁突置换术作为下颌骨重建的一部分。恶性病理18例(51.4%),良性病理17例(48.6%)。术前放疗11例(32.4%)。术后放疗15例(44.1%)。5例(14.3%)术后需返回手术室进行包括髁突组成部分在内的部分钢板移除。25例(71.4%)获得满意的咬合效果。长期单侧面瘫7例(20.6%)。术后立即发生面瘫4例(11.8%),延迟发病3例(8.8%)。在1例患者中,髁假体穿过盂窝被侵蚀,但仍无症状。应考虑调查更大的患者系列,特别是比较有髁突假体和没有髁突假体的患者。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信