Woody densification and its management shape insect and bat communities in an African savanna.

IF 3.4 2区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION
Jessica Comley , Keenan Stears , Melissa H. Schmitt , Terence Olckers , Dan M. Parker
{"title":"Woody densification and its management shape insect and bat communities in an African savanna.","authors":"Jessica Comley ,&nbsp;Keenan Stears ,&nbsp;Melissa H. Schmitt ,&nbsp;Terence Olckers ,&nbsp;Dan M. Parker","doi":"10.1016/j.gecco.2025.e03875","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Understanding management-driven interactions is critical for savanna biodiversity conservation. Vegetation management alters ecosystem structure, potentially impacting higher trophic levels, including insects vital to insectivorous bat communities. Our study in MalaMala Game Reserve, South Africa, examined five management approaches (densified, intermediate woody cover, summer mow, winter mow, rest) within an experimental design, assessing their effects on vegetation (tree density, grass height), insect abundance and richness (via light traps), and bat activity and richness (via acoustic monitoring). Habitat management significantly influenced habitat structure, producing contrasting responses in insect and bat communities. Specifically, insect abundance and richness increased with woody plant cover, whereas bat activity decreased. Low tree density and short grass areas supported high bat activity, but had the lowest insect abundance and species richness, likely due to bats' mobility and adaptable foraging behaviours. Intermediate woody cover and taller grass hosted diverse insect communities with moderate bat activity. Dense woody cover hosted the richest insect communities but the lowest bat activity, favouring clutter-specialist bats like <em>Rhinolophus smithersi</em>, which prefer thick vegetation. Our findings highlight the nuanced interactions within savanna ecosystems and the importance of maintaining heterogeneous landscapes with a range of vegetation structures to support diverse insect and bat communities. Mixed habitat management practices that create habitats with varying woody plant densities and herbaceous layer heights can enhance insect abundance and bat diversity across landscapes. This study underscores the complex interplay between vegetation, prey availability, and bat foraging, providing important insights for savanna biodiversity conservation.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":54264,"journal":{"name":"Global Ecology and Conservation","volume":"63 ","pages":"Article e03875"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global Ecology and Conservation","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2351989425004767","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Understanding management-driven interactions is critical for savanna biodiversity conservation. Vegetation management alters ecosystem structure, potentially impacting higher trophic levels, including insects vital to insectivorous bat communities. Our study in MalaMala Game Reserve, South Africa, examined five management approaches (densified, intermediate woody cover, summer mow, winter mow, rest) within an experimental design, assessing their effects on vegetation (tree density, grass height), insect abundance and richness (via light traps), and bat activity and richness (via acoustic monitoring). Habitat management significantly influenced habitat structure, producing contrasting responses in insect and bat communities. Specifically, insect abundance and richness increased with woody plant cover, whereas bat activity decreased. Low tree density and short grass areas supported high bat activity, but had the lowest insect abundance and species richness, likely due to bats' mobility and adaptable foraging behaviours. Intermediate woody cover and taller grass hosted diverse insect communities with moderate bat activity. Dense woody cover hosted the richest insect communities but the lowest bat activity, favouring clutter-specialist bats like Rhinolophus smithersi, which prefer thick vegetation. Our findings highlight the nuanced interactions within savanna ecosystems and the importance of maintaining heterogeneous landscapes with a range of vegetation structures to support diverse insect and bat communities. Mixed habitat management practices that create habitats with varying woody plant densities and herbaceous layer heights can enhance insect abundance and bat diversity across landscapes. This study underscores the complex interplay between vegetation, prey availability, and bat foraging, providing important insights for savanna biodiversity conservation.
非洲热带稀树草原上树木的致密化及其管理对昆虫和蝙蝠群落的影响。
了解管理驱动的相互作用对稀树草原生物多样性保护至关重要。植被管理改变了生态系统结构,可能影响到更高的营养水平,包括对食虫蝙蝠群落至关重要的昆虫。我们在南非MalaMala野生动物保护区进行了一项研究,在实验设计中研究了五种管理方法(密集化,中间木质覆盖,夏季刈割,冬季刈割,休息),评估了它们对植被(树木密度,草高),昆虫丰度和丰富度(通过光陷阱)以及蝙蝠活动和丰富度(通过声学监测)的影响。生境管理对生境结构有显著影响,在昆虫和蝙蝠群落中产生不同的响应。昆虫的丰度和丰富度随着木本植物覆盖的增加而增加,而蝙蝠的活动则减少。低树密度和短草区支持高蝙蝠活动,但昆虫丰度和物种丰富度最低,可能是由于蝙蝠的流动性和适应性觅食行为。中间的木本植被和较高的草地上有多种昆虫群落,蝙蝠活动适度。茂密的树木覆盖着最丰富的昆虫群落,但蝙蝠的活动却最低,这有利于像史密瑟犀这样喜欢茂密植被的杂乱专家蝙蝠。我们的研究结果强调了稀树草原生态系统内部微妙的相互作用,以及维持具有一系列植被结构的异质景观以支持多种昆虫和蝙蝠群落的重要性。混合生境管理实践创造了具有不同木本植物密度和草本层高度的生境,可以提高整个景观的昆虫丰度和蝙蝠多样性。这项研究强调了植被、猎物可得性和蝙蝠觅食之间复杂的相互作用,为稀树草原生物多样性保护提供了重要的见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Global Ecology and Conservation
Global Ecology and Conservation Agricultural and Biological Sciences-Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
CiteScore
8.10
自引率
5.00%
发文量
346
审稿时长
83 days
期刊介绍: Global Ecology and Conservation is a peer-reviewed, open-access journal covering all sub-disciplines of ecological and conservation science: from theory to practice, from molecules to ecosystems, from regional to global. The fields covered include: organismal, population, community, and ecosystem ecology; physiological, evolutionary, and behavioral ecology; and conservation science.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信