Impact of conflicts on agricultural crop investment in rural areas: Policy insight from a nationally representative survey dataset

IF 5.9 1区 社会学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES
Abiodun Olusola Omotayo , Adelayo Adeoye , Abeeb Babatunde Omotoso , Adebayo Isaiah Ogunniyi
{"title":"Impact of conflicts on agricultural crop investment in rural areas: Policy insight from a nationally representative survey dataset","authors":"Abiodun Olusola Omotayo ,&nbsp;Adelayo Adeoye ,&nbsp;Abeeb Babatunde Omotoso ,&nbsp;Adebayo Isaiah Ogunniyi","doi":"10.1016/j.landusepol.2025.107793","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Conflicts have emerged as a major constraint to agricultural development in Nigeria, undermining investment, productivity, and rural livelihoods. This study investigates the impact of conflict on agricultural investment decisions among rural households in Nigeria, using nationally representative panel data from the Living Standards Measurement Study – Integrated Surveys on Agriculture (LSMS-ISA) merged with conflict data from the Armed Conflict Location &amp; Event Data Project (ACLED). Agricultural crop investment is proxied by three dimensions: crop choice, land area allocated for cultivation, and cost of production. We apply fixed-effects regression and a modified Difference-in-Differences (αDiD) approach to estimate the causal effects of conflict exposure within a 10-kilometer radius of households’ residences. The results reveal that conflict significantly reduces the likelihood of cultivating key staple crops including yam, sweet potato, maize, and cassava and contracts land area allocated to these crops. Total agricultural crop investment, as measured by production costs, declines in conflict-affected areas, particularly on female-managed plots, while mixed-managed plots experience cost increases, reflecting differentiated coping strategies. These effects highlight the distortionary impact of conflict on household investment behaviour, with implications for food security, rural poverty, and economic stability. The findings underscore the need for conflict-sensitive agricultural policies that promote resilience through targeted support for affected farmers, land tenure security, and inclusive financing mechanisms. By providing robust empirical evidence on the intersection of conflict and agricultural investment, this study offers critical policy insights for rebuilding rural economies and safeguarding Nigeria’s agri-food system in conflict-prone regions.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":17933,"journal":{"name":"Land Use Policy","volume":"159 ","pages":"Article 107793"},"PeriodicalIF":5.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Land Use Policy","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0264837725003278","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Conflicts have emerged as a major constraint to agricultural development in Nigeria, undermining investment, productivity, and rural livelihoods. This study investigates the impact of conflict on agricultural investment decisions among rural households in Nigeria, using nationally representative panel data from the Living Standards Measurement Study – Integrated Surveys on Agriculture (LSMS-ISA) merged with conflict data from the Armed Conflict Location & Event Data Project (ACLED). Agricultural crop investment is proxied by three dimensions: crop choice, land area allocated for cultivation, and cost of production. We apply fixed-effects regression and a modified Difference-in-Differences (αDiD) approach to estimate the causal effects of conflict exposure within a 10-kilometer radius of households’ residences. The results reveal that conflict significantly reduces the likelihood of cultivating key staple crops including yam, sweet potato, maize, and cassava and contracts land area allocated to these crops. Total agricultural crop investment, as measured by production costs, declines in conflict-affected areas, particularly on female-managed plots, while mixed-managed plots experience cost increases, reflecting differentiated coping strategies. These effects highlight the distortionary impact of conflict on household investment behaviour, with implications for food security, rural poverty, and economic stability. The findings underscore the need for conflict-sensitive agricultural policies that promote resilience through targeted support for affected farmers, land tenure security, and inclusive financing mechanisms. By providing robust empirical evidence on the intersection of conflict and agricultural investment, this study offers critical policy insights for rebuilding rural economies and safeguarding Nigeria’s agri-food system in conflict-prone regions.
冲突对农村地区农作物投资的影响:来自全国代表性调查数据集的政策洞察
冲突已成为尼日利亚农业发展的主要制约因素,破坏了投资、生产力和农村生计。本研究调查了冲突对尼日利亚农村家庭农业投资决策的影响,使用了生活水平衡量研究-农业综合调查(lsm - isa)的全国代表性面板数据,并结合了武装冲突地点和事件数据项目(ACLED)的冲突数据。农作物投资表现为作物选择、耕地面积和生产成本三个维度。我们采用固定效应回归和修正的差中差(αDiD)方法来估计家庭住宅半径10公里范围内冲突暴露的因果效应。结果表明,冲突显著降低了种植主要主粮作物的可能性,包括山药、甘薯、玉米和木薯,并减少了分配给这些作物的土地面积。以生产成本衡量的农作物总投资在受冲突影响地区下降,特别是在女性管理的地块上,而混合管理的地块则出现成本上升,反映出不同的应对策略。这些影响凸显了冲突对家庭投资行为的扭曲影响,对粮食安全、农村贫困和经济稳定产生影响。研究结果强调,需要制定对冲突敏感的农业政策,通过有针对性地支持受影响农民、保障土地保有权和包容性融资机制来提高抗灾能力。通过提供有关冲突与农业投资相互关系的有力实证证据,本研究为在冲突多发地区重建农村经济和保障尼日利亚农业粮食体系提供了重要的政策见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Land Use Policy
Land Use Policy ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES-
CiteScore
13.70
自引率
8.50%
发文量
553
期刊介绍: Land Use Policy is an international and interdisciplinary journal concerned with the social, economic, political, legal, physical and planning aspects of urban and rural land use. Land Use Policy examines issues in geography, agriculture, forestry, irrigation, environmental conservation, housing, urban development and transport in both developed and developing countries through major refereed articles and shorter viewpoint pieces.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信