Jiamei Wang, Chen Peng, Kai Chen, Xianglong Guo, Lefu Zhang
{"title":"A comparative study of oxide scales formed on Alloy 690 in deaerated supercritical water and supercritical CO2 at 600 °C","authors":"Jiamei Wang, Chen Peng, Kai Chen, Xianglong Guo, Lefu Zhang","doi":"10.1016/j.nucengdes.2025.114502","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Selecting an optimal material that offers a balanced combination of mechanical strength, outstanding corrosion resistance, and minimal neutron absorption remains a key challenge for both Generation-IV nuclear systems and materials science research. Austenitic alloys, including Fe-based stainless steels and Ni-based alloys, have emerged as promising alternatives to ferritic/martensitic (F/M) steels, owing to their superior corrosion resistance and improved creep performance. Among them, high-chromium Ni-based alloys demonstrate superior corrosion and oxidation resistance in high temperature steam-exceeding that of Fe-based austenitic stainless steels and F/M steels by over an order of magnitude. In this work, a comparative study of oxide scales formed on Alloy 690 in deaerated supercritical water and supercritical CO<sub>2</sub> at 600 °C was conducted. The study found that weight gains in both environments follow near-cubic rate laws. The superior oxidation resistance observed in both environments, compared to other pure austenitic alloys such as 800H, 316L, and 347, can mainly be attributed to its high chromium content. Nearly 1.5 times higher oxidation rate was observed in supercritical CO<sub>2</sub> than in SCW. A key observation was that the direct external oxidation and the rapid transition from internal to external oxidation within the initial 24-hours exposure in both two environments are responsible for its superior oxidation resistance. With prolonged exposure time, Cr-rich spinel oxides and Ni-rich networks within the internal oxidation zone gradually convert into Cr<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub>, contributing to the growth of this protective chromia scale and thereby significantly retarding the oxidation process. Severe grain boundaries (GB) migration and oxidation was observed in both environments as the Cr-rich oxides at the GB was less effective at preventing oxidation, resulting in a significantly faster oxidation rate in these areas compared to the bulk grains. The slightly higher oxidation rate in supercritical CO<sub>2</sub> might be mainly attributed to the limited protection provided by the sparse outer NiO oxide scale and the breakdown of the innermost SiO<sub>2</sub> rich oxide film at O/M interface.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":19170,"journal":{"name":"Nuclear Engineering and Design","volume":"445 ","pages":"Article 114502"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nuclear Engineering and Design","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S002954932500679X","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NUCLEAR SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Selecting an optimal material that offers a balanced combination of mechanical strength, outstanding corrosion resistance, and minimal neutron absorption remains a key challenge for both Generation-IV nuclear systems and materials science research. Austenitic alloys, including Fe-based stainless steels and Ni-based alloys, have emerged as promising alternatives to ferritic/martensitic (F/M) steels, owing to their superior corrosion resistance and improved creep performance. Among them, high-chromium Ni-based alloys demonstrate superior corrosion and oxidation resistance in high temperature steam-exceeding that of Fe-based austenitic stainless steels and F/M steels by over an order of magnitude. In this work, a comparative study of oxide scales formed on Alloy 690 in deaerated supercritical water and supercritical CO2 at 600 °C was conducted. The study found that weight gains in both environments follow near-cubic rate laws. The superior oxidation resistance observed in both environments, compared to other pure austenitic alloys such as 800H, 316L, and 347, can mainly be attributed to its high chromium content. Nearly 1.5 times higher oxidation rate was observed in supercritical CO2 than in SCW. A key observation was that the direct external oxidation and the rapid transition from internal to external oxidation within the initial 24-hours exposure in both two environments are responsible for its superior oxidation resistance. With prolonged exposure time, Cr-rich spinel oxides and Ni-rich networks within the internal oxidation zone gradually convert into Cr2O3, contributing to the growth of this protective chromia scale and thereby significantly retarding the oxidation process. Severe grain boundaries (GB) migration and oxidation was observed in both environments as the Cr-rich oxides at the GB was less effective at preventing oxidation, resulting in a significantly faster oxidation rate in these areas compared to the bulk grains. The slightly higher oxidation rate in supercritical CO2 might be mainly attributed to the limited protection provided by the sparse outer NiO oxide scale and the breakdown of the innermost SiO2 rich oxide film at O/M interface.
期刊介绍:
Nuclear Engineering and Design covers the wide range of disciplines involved in the engineering, design, safety and construction of nuclear fission reactors. The Editors welcome papers both on applied and innovative aspects and developments in nuclear science and technology.
Fundamentals of Reactor Design include:
• Thermal-Hydraulics and Core Physics
• Safety Analysis, Risk Assessment (PSA)
• Structural and Mechanical Engineering
• Materials Science
• Fuel Behavior and Design
• Structural Plant Design
• Engineering of Reactor Components
• Experiments
Aspects beyond fundamentals of Reactor Design covered:
• Accident Mitigation Measures
• Reactor Control Systems
• Licensing Issues
• Safeguard Engineering
• Economy of Plants
• Reprocessing / Waste Disposal
• Applications of Nuclear Energy
• Maintenance
• Decommissioning
Papers on new reactor ideas and developments (Generation IV reactors) such as inherently safe modular HTRs, High Performance LWRs/HWRs and LMFBs/GFR will be considered; Actinide Burners, Accelerator Driven Systems, Energy Amplifiers and other special designs of power and research reactors and their applications are also encouraged.