Frederike K. Lemmel , Thole H. Hoppen , Nexhmedin Morina
{"title":"Long-term effects of social norm interventions on pro-environmental behaviours: A systematic review and meta-analysis","authors":"Frederike K. Lemmel , Thole H. Hoppen , Nexhmedin Morina","doi":"10.1016/j.jenvp.2025.102784","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Anthropogenic climate change poses a serious threat to human health, economic stability, and biodiversity, underscoring the growing importance of interventions that promote pro-environmental behaviour. Previous meta-analyses suggest that social norm interventions, which inform individuals about behavioural norms or societal attitudes towards specific behaviours, are effective in the short-term. However, further research is needed to determine whether effects are sustained over time. Our systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to assess the long-term effectiveness of controlled field experiments employing social norm interventions for pro-environmental behaviours. It included a search from induction to February 4th, 2025 in Scopus, Web of Science, ERIC, PsycInfo, and OSF Preprints. We included 24 publications reporting on 25 studies in the narrative review, ten of which were incorporated into the quantitative synthesis. The random-effects meta-analysis yielded a small but significant effect (<em>g</em> = −0.07; <em>95 %CI</em> = −0.11 to −0.03, <em>p</em> = .0022; <em>I</em><sup>2</sup> = 76 %) compared to passive control conditions (M follow-up 22.05 months; SD = 19.04). Of the 15 studies reviewed narratively, 13 reported reductions in consumption behaviours ranging from −0.081 % to 30 % and were thus largely consistent with the results of the meta-analysis. Given their their low cost and scalability, even small effects may yield meaningful societal impact. The pooled effect should be interpreted with caution, as the meta-analysis included only ten studies and exhibited substantial heterogeneity among them. Future research should explore strategies to enhance the long-term effectiveness of social norm interventions and potential moderators and mediators.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48439,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Environmental Psychology","volume":"107 ","pages":"Article 102784"},"PeriodicalIF":7.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Environmental Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0272494425002671","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Anthropogenic climate change poses a serious threat to human health, economic stability, and biodiversity, underscoring the growing importance of interventions that promote pro-environmental behaviour. Previous meta-analyses suggest that social norm interventions, which inform individuals about behavioural norms or societal attitudes towards specific behaviours, are effective in the short-term. However, further research is needed to determine whether effects are sustained over time. Our systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to assess the long-term effectiveness of controlled field experiments employing social norm interventions for pro-environmental behaviours. It included a search from induction to February 4th, 2025 in Scopus, Web of Science, ERIC, PsycInfo, and OSF Preprints. We included 24 publications reporting on 25 studies in the narrative review, ten of which were incorporated into the quantitative synthesis. The random-effects meta-analysis yielded a small but significant effect (g = −0.07; 95 %CI = −0.11 to −0.03, p = .0022; I2 = 76 %) compared to passive control conditions (M follow-up 22.05 months; SD = 19.04). Of the 15 studies reviewed narratively, 13 reported reductions in consumption behaviours ranging from −0.081 % to 30 % and were thus largely consistent with the results of the meta-analysis. Given their their low cost and scalability, even small effects may yield meaningful societal impact. The pooled effect should be interpreted with caution, as the meta-analysis included only ten studies and exhibited substantial heterogeneity among them. Future research should explore strategies to enhance the long-term effectiveness of social norm interventions and potential moderators and mediators.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Environmental Psychology is the premier journal in the field, serving individuals in a wide range of disciplines who have an interest in the scientific study of the transactions and interrelationships between people and their surroundings (including built, social, natural and virtual environments, the use and abuse of nature and natural resources, and sustainability-related behavior). The journal publishes internationally contributed empirical studies and reviews of research on these topics that advance new insights. As an important forum for the field, the journal publishes some of the most influential papers in the discipline that reflect the scientific development of environmental psychology. Contributions on theoretical, methodological, and practical aspects of all human-environment interactions are welcome, along with innovative or interdisciplinary approaches that have a psychological emphasis. Research areas include: •Psychological and behavioral aspects of people and nature •Cognitive mapping, spatial cognition and wayfinding •Ecological consequences of human actions •Theories of place, place attachment, and place identity •Environmental risks and hazards: perception, behavior, and management •Perception and evaluation of buildings and natural landscapes •Effects of physical and natural settings on human cognition and health •Theories of proenvironmental behavior, norms, attitudes, and personality •Psychology of sustainability and climate change •Psychological aspects of resource management and crises •Social use of space: crowding, privacy, territoriality, personal space •Design of, and experiences related to, the physical aspects of workplaces, schools, residences, public buildings and public space