Long-term effects of social norm interventions on pro-environmental behaviours: A systematic review and meta-analysis

IF 7 1区 心理学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES
Frederike K. Lemmel , Thole H. Hoppen , Nexhmedin Morina
{"title":"Long-term effects of social norm interventions on pro-environmental behaviours: A systematic review and meta-analysis","authors":"Frederike K. Lemmel ,&nbsp;Thole H. Hoppen ,&nbsp;Nexhmedin Morina","doi":"10.1016/j.jenvp.2025.102784","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Anthropogenic climate change poses a serious threat to human health, economic stability, and biodiversity, underscoring the growing importance of interventions that promote pro-environmental behaviour. Previous meta-analyses suggest that social norm interventions, which inform individuals about behavioural norms or societal attitudes towards specific behaviours, are effective in the short-term. However, further research is needed to determine whether effects are sustained over time. Our systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to assess the long-term effectiveness of controlled field experiments employing social norm interventions for pro-environmental behaviours. It included a search from induction to February 4th, 2025 in Scopus, Web of Science, ERIC, PsycInfo, and OSF Preprints. We included 24 publications reporting on 25 studies in the narrative review, ten of which were incorporated into the quantitative synthesis. The random-effects meta-analysis yielded a small but significant effect (<em>g</em> = −0.07; <em>95 %CI</em> = −0.11 to −0.03, <em>p</em> = .0022; <em>I</em><sup>2</sup> = 76 %) compared to passive control conditions (M follow-up 22.05 months; SD = 19.04). Of the 15 studies reviewed narratively, 13 reported reductions in consumption behaviours ranging from −0.081 % to 30 % and were thus largely consistent with the results of the meta-analysis. Given their their low cost and scalability, even small effects may yield meaningful societal impact. The pooled effect should be interpreted with caution, as the meta-analysis included only ten studies and exhibited substantial heterogeneity among them. Future research should explore strategies to enhance the long-term effectiveness of social norm interventions and potential moderators and mediators.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48439,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Environmental Psychology","volume":"107 ","pages":"Article 102784"},"PeriodicalIF":7.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Environmental Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0272494425002671","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Anthropogenic climate change poses a serious threat to human health, economic stability, and biodiversity, underscoring the growing importance of interventions that promote pro-environmental behaviour. Previous meta-analyses suggest that social norm interventions, which inform individuals about behavioural norms or societal attitudes towards specific behaviours, are effective in the short-term. However, further research is needed to determine whether effects are sustained over time. Our systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to assess the long-term effectiveness of controlled field experiments employing social norm interventions for pro-environmental behaviours. It included a search from induction to February 4th, 2025 in Scopus, Web of Science, ERIC, PsycInfo, and OSF Preprints. We included 24 publications reporting on 25 studies in the narrative review, ten of which were incorporated into the quantitative synthesis. The random-effects meta-analysis yielded a small but significant effect (g = −0.07; 95 %CI = −0.11 to −0.03, p = .0022; I2 = 76 %) compared to passive control conditions (M follow-up 22.05 months; SD = 19.04). Of the 15 studies reviewed narratively, 13 reported reductions in consumption behaviours ranging from −0.081 % to 30 % and were thus largely consistent with the results of the meta-analysis. Given their their low cost and scalability, even small effects may yield meaningful societal impact. The pooled effect should be interpreted with caution, as the meta-analysis included only ten studies and exhibited substantial heterogeneity among them. Future research should explore strategies to enhance the long-term effectiveness of social norm interventions and potential moderators and mediators.
社会规范干预对亲环境行为的长期影响:系统回顾和荟萃分析
人为的气候变化对人类健康、经济稳定和生物多样性构成严重威胁,强调了促进亲环境行为的干预措施日益重要。先前的荟萃分析表明,社会规范干预,即告知个人行为规范或对特定行为的社会态度,在短期内是有效的。然而,需要进一步的研究来确定影响是否会持续一段时间。我们的系统回顾和荟萃分析旨在评估采用社会规范干预亲环境行为的对照现场实验的长期有效性。它包括在Scopus, Web of Science, ERIC, PsycInfo和OSF Preprints中从归纳到2025年2月4日的搜索。我们在叙述性综述中纳入了24篇报道25项研究的出版物,其中10篇纳入了定量综合。随机效应荟萃分析显示,与被动对照组(M组随访22.05个月;SD = 19.04)相比,随机效应的影响较小但显著(g = - 0.07; 95% CI = - 0.11至- 0.03,p = 0.0022; I2 = 76%)。在叙述回顾的15项研究中,13项报告了消费行为的减少,范围从- 0.081%到30%,因此与元分析的结果基本一致。考虑到它们的低成本和可扩展性,即使是很小的影响也可能产生有意义的社会影响。合并效应应谨慎解释,因为荟萃分析仅包括10项研究,并且在它们之间显示出实质性的异质性。未来的研究应探索提高社会规范干预的长期有效性的策略和潜在的调节和中介。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
10.60
自引率
8.70%
发文量
140
审稿时长
62 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Environmental Psychology is the premier journal in the field, serving individuals in a wide range of disciplines who have an interest in the scientific study of the transactions and interrelationships between people and their surroundings (including built, social, natural and virtual environments, the use and abuse of nature and natural resources, and sustainability-related behavior). The journal publishes internationally contributed empirical studies and reviews of research on these topics that advance new insights. As an important forum for the field, the journal publishes some of the most influential papers in the discipline that reflect the scientific development of environmental psychology. Contributions on theoretical, methodological, and practical aspects of all human-environment interactions are welcome, along with innovative or interdisciplinary approaches that have a psychological emphasis. Research areas include: •Psychological and behavioral aspects of people and nature •Cognitive mapping, spatial cognition and wayfinding •Ecological consequences of human actions •Theories of place, place attachment, and place identity •Environmental risks and hazards: perception, behavior, and management •Perception and evaluation of buildings and natural landscapes •Effects of physical and natural settings on human cognition and health •Theories of proenvironmental behavior, norms, attitudes, and personality •Psychology of sustainability and climate change •Psychological aspects of resource management and crises •Social use of space: crowding, privacy, territoriality, personal space •Design of, and experiences related to, the physical aspects of workplaces, schools, residences, public buildings and public space
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信