Hoi-Wing Chan , Kim-Pong Tam , Xue Wang , Ying-yi Hong
{"title":"The bidirectional relationship between interpersonal climate change discussion and climate change anxiety","authors":"Hoi-Wing Chan , Kim-Pong Tam , Xue Wang , Ying-yi Hong","doi":"10.1016/j.jenvp.2025.102785","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Emerging research has suggested that people may experience anxiety and distress about climate change (i.e., climate change anxiety), even for those who are not directly affected by extreme weather events. While previous research has demonstrated the benefit of interpersonal climate change discussion in promoting climate change beliefs, the literature has yet to examine the relationship between interpersonal climate change discussion and climate change anxiety. On the one hand, such discussion may increase people's exposure to climate change information and make them more focused on it, which possibly triggers more anxiety. On the other hand, previous studies suggest that climate change anxiety can be a normal and adaptive response to climate change, which motivates people to engage in behaviors aiming to address climate change. It is thus possible that climate change anxiety would promote interpersonal climate change discussion. In this research, we test this bidirectional relationship using a two-wave longitudinal design. Cross-lagged panel analyses revealed a positive bidirectional longitudinal link in both the U.S. and China, suggesting a potential feedback loop between climate change anxiety and interpersonal climate change discussion. Climate change anxiety would relate to more frequent engagement in interpersonal climate change discussions, and yet such discussion would relate to more anxiety responses. Our findings thus indicate the need to examine under what circumstances interpersonal climate change discussion would be an adaptive rather than a maladaptive strategy.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48439,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Environmental Psychology","volume":"107 ","pages":"Article 102785"},"PeriodicalIF":7.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Environmental Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0272494425002683","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Emerging research has suggested that people may experience anxiety and distress about climate change (i.e., climate change anxiety), even for those who are not directly affected by extreme weather events. While previous research has demonstrated the benefit of interpersonal climate change discussion in promoting climate change beliefs, the literature has yet to examine the relationship between interpersonal climate change discussion and climate change anxiety. On the one hand, such discussion may increase people's exposure to climate change information and make them more focused on it, which possibly triggers more anxiety. On the other hand, previous studies suggest that climate change anxiety can be a normal and adaptive response to climate change, which motivates people to engage in behaviors aiming to address climate change. It is thus possible that climate change anxiety would promote interpersonal climate change discussion. In this research, we test this bidirectional relationship using a two-wave longitudinal design. Cross-lagged panel analyses revealed a positive bidirectional longitudinal link in both the U.S. and China, suggesting a potential feedback loop between climate change anxiety and interpersonal climate change discussion. Climate change anxiety would relate to more frequent engagement in interpersonal climate change discussions, and yet such discussion would relate to more anxiety responses. Our findings thus indicate the need to examine under what circumstances interpersonal climate change discussion would be an adaptive rather than a maladaptive strategy.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Environmental Psychology is the premier journal in the field, serving individuals in a wide range of disciplines who have an interest in the scientific study of the transactions and interrelationships between people and their surroundings (including built, social, natural and virtual environments, the use and abuse of nature and natural resources, and sustainability-related behavior). The journal publishes internationally contributed empirical studies and reviews of research on these topics that advance new insights. As an important forum for the field, the journal publishes some of the most influential papers in the discipline that reflect the scientific development of environmental psychology. Contributions on theoretical, methodological, and practical aspects of all human-environment interactions are welcome, along with innovative or interdisciplinary approaches that have a psychological emphasis. Research areas include: •Psychological and behavioral aspects of people and nature •Cognitive mapping, spatial cognition and wayfinding •Ecological consequences of human actions •Theories of place, place attachment, and place identity •Environmental risks and hazards: perception, behavior, and management •Perception and evaluation of buildings and natural landscapes •Effects of physical and natural settings on human cognition and health •Theories of proenvironmental behavior, norms, attitudes, and personality •Psychology of sustainability and climate change •Psychological aspects of resource management and crises •Social use of space: crowding, privacy, territoriality, personal space •Design of, and experiences related to, the physical aspects of workplaces, schools, residences, public buildings and public space