The bidirectional relationship between interpersonal climate change discussion and climate change anxiety

IF 7 1区 心理学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES
Hoi-Wing Chan , Kim-Pong Tam , Xue Wang , Ying-yi Hong
{"title":"The bidirectional relationship between interpersonal climate change discussion and climate change anxiety","authors":"Hoi-Wing Chan ,&nbsp;Kim-Pong Tam ,&nbsp;Xue Wang ,&nbsp;Ying-yi Hong","doi":"10.1016/j.jenvp.2025.102785","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Emerging research has suggested that people may experience anxiety and distress about climate change (i.e., climate change anxiety), even for those who are not directly affected by extreme weather events. While previous research has demonstrated the benefit of interpersonal climate change discussion in promoting climate change beliefs, the literature has yet to examine the relationship between interpersonal climate change discussion and climate change anxiety. On the one hand, such discussion may increase people's exposure to climate change information and make them more focused on it, which possibly triggers more anxiety. On the other hand, previous studies suggest that climate change anxiety can be a normal and adaptive response to climate change, which motivates people to engage in behaviors aiming to address climate change. It is thus possible that climate change anxiety would promote interpersonal climate change discussion. In this research, we test this bidirectional relationship using a two-wave longitudinal design. Cross-lagged panel analyses revealed a positive bidirectional longitudinal link in both the U.S. and China, suggesting a potential feedback loop between climate change anxiety and interpersonal climate change discussion. Climate change anxiety would relate to more frequent engagement in interpersonal climate change discussions, and yet such discussion would relate to more anxiety responses. Our findings thus indicate the need to examine under what circumstances interpersonal climate change discussion would be an adaptive rather than a maladaptive strategy.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48439,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Environmental Psychology","volume":"107 ","pages":"Article 102785"},"PeriodicalIF":7.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Environmental Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0272494425002683","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Emerging research has suggested that people may experience anxiety and distress about climate change (i.e., climate change anxiety), even for those who are not directly affected by extreme weather events. While previous research has demonstrated the benefit of interpersonal climate change discussion in promoting climate change beliefs, the literature has yet to examine the relationship between interpersonal climate change discussion and climate change anxiety. On the one hand, such discussion may increase people's exposure to climate change information and make them more focused on it, which possibly triggers more anxiety. On the other hand, previous studies suggest that climate change anxiety can be a normal and adaptive response to climate change, which motivates people to engage in behaviors aiming to address climate change. It is thus possible that climate change anxiety would promote interpersonal climate change discussion. In this research, we test this bidirectional relationship using a two-wave longitudinal design. Cross-lagged panel analyses revealed a positive bidirectional longitudinal link in both the U.S. and China, suggesting a potential feedback loop between climate change anxiety and interpersonal climate change discussion. Climate change anxiety would relate to more frequent engagement in interpersonal climate change discussions, and yet such discussion would relate to more anxiety responses. Our findings thus indicate the need to examine under what circumstances interpersonal climate change discussion would be an adaptive rather than a maladaptive strategy.
人际气候变化讨论与气候变化焦虑的双向关系
新兴研究表明,人们可能会对气候变化感到焦虑和痛苦(即气候变化焦虑),即使对那些没有直接受到极端天气事件影响的人来说也是如此。虽然先前的研究已经证明了人际气候变化讨论在促进气候变化信念方面的好处,但文献尚未研究人际气候变化讨论与气候变化焦虑之间的关系。一方面,这样的讨论可能会增加人们对气候变化信息的接触,使他们更加关注气候变化,这可能会引发更多的焦虑。另一方面,先前的研究表明,气候变化焦虑可能是对气候变化的正常和适应性反应,它激励人们从事旨在应对气候变化的行为。因此,气候变化焦虑可能会促进人际间的气候变化讨论。在本研究中,我们使用两波纵向设计来测试这种双向关系。交叉滞后面板分析显示,美国和中国都存在正的双向纵向联系,表明气候变化焦虑与人际气候变化讨论之间存在潜在的反馈循环。气候变化焦虑与更频繁地参与人际气候变化讨论有关,但这种讨论与更多的焦虑反应有关。因此,我们的研究结果表明,有必要研究在什么情况下,人际气候变化讨论将是一种适应性策略,而不是一种不适应策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
10.60
自引率
8.70%
发文量
140
审稿时长
62 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Environmental Psychology is the premier journal in the field, serving individuals in a wide range of disciplines who have an interest in the scientific study of the transactions and interrelationships between people and their surroundings (including built, social, natural and virtual environments, the use and abuse of nature and natural resources, and sustainability-related behavior). The journal publishes internationally contributed empirical studies and reviews of research on these topics that advance new insights. As an important forum for the field, the journal publishes some of the most influential papers in the discipline that reflect the scientific development of environmental psychology. Contributions on theoretical, methodological, and practical aspects of all human-environment interactions are welcome, along with innovative or interdisciplinary approaches that have a psychological emphasis. Research areas include: •Psychological and behavioral aspects of people and nature •Cognitive mapping, spatial cognition and wayfinding •Ecological consequences of human actions •Theories of place, place attachment, and place identity •Environmental risks and hazards: perception, behavior, and management •Perception and evaluation of buildings and natural landscapes •Effects of physical and natural settings on human cognition and health •Theories of proenvironmental behavior, norms, attitudes, and personality •Psychology of sustainability and climate change •Psychological aspects of resource management and crises •Social use of space: crowding, privacy, territoriality, personal space •Design of, and experiences related to, the physical aspects of workplaces, schools, residences, public buildings and public space
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信