Horizontal and vertical individualism and collectivism of Chinese migrant university students and their relationships with adjustment: A scale validation and exploratory investigation

IF 2.8 2区 社会学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL
Hanzhi Fu
{"title":"Horizontal and vertical individualism and collectivism of Chinese migrant university students and their relationships with adjustment: A scale validation and exploratory investigation","authors":"Hanzhi Fu","doi":"10.1016/j.ijintrel.2025.102302","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>China is widely regarded as a large multicultural country where migrating within its borders usually necessitates cross-cultural adjustment, especially for university students who leave their familiar hometowns for new environments. Over decades, numerous variables have been identified as predictors of cross-cultural adjustment, but major value patterns have received nominal attention in this area. This study investigates the relationships of horizontal and vertical individualism and collectivism with domestic migrant university students’ cross-cultural adjustment after first validating the individualism and collectivism scale (INDCOL) and the academic and social adjustment scale in contemporary Chinese contexts. A questionnaire survey was administered among 1296 migrant university students in the culturally diverse city of Shanghai. First, the adapted Chinese version of the above two scales were tested via exploratory factor analyses (EFA), confirmatory factor analyses (CFA), validity tests, reliability tests, and measurement invariance tests. Then, the differences between the four value dimensions in the Chinese version of the INDCOL (INDCOL-C) were examined. Finally, multivariate regression analyses were performed by using these four value dimensions as independent variables and two ingredients of cross-cultural adjustment (academic and social adjustment) as dependent variables. The aforementioned two instruments were validated in Chinese contexts. Horizontal individualism were shown to be the strongest value tendency among Chinese university students today. Horizontal and vertical individualism and collectivism were all revealed to predict cross-cultural adjustment of internal migrant university students.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48216,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Intercultural Relations","volume":"109 ","pages":"Article 102302"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Intercultural Relations","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0147176725001658","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

China is widely regarded as a large multicultural country where migrating within its borders usually necessitates cross-cultural adjustment, especially for university students who leave their familiar hometowns for new environments. Over decades, numerous variables have been identified as predictors of cross-cultural adjustment, but major value patterns have received nominal attention in this area. This study investigates the relationships of horizontal and vertical individualism and collectivism with domestic migrant university students’ cross-cultural adjustment after first validating the individualism and collectivism scale (INDCOL) and the academic and social adjustment scale in contemporary Chinese contexts. A questionnaire survey was administered among 1296 migrant university students in the culturally diverse city of Shanghai. First, the adapted Chinese version of the above two scales were tested via exploratory factor analyses (EFA), confirmatory factor analyses (CFA), validity tests, reliability tests, and measurement invariance tests. Then, the differences between the four value dimensions in the Chinese version of the INDCOL (INDCOL-C) were examined. Finally, multivariate regression analyses were performed by using these four value dimensions as independent variables and two ingredients of cross-cultural adjustment (academic and social adjustment) as dependent variables. The aforementioned two instruments were validated in Chinese contexts. Horizontal individualism were shown to be the strongest value tendency among Chinese university students today. Horizontal and vertical individualism and collectivism were all revealed to predict cross-cultural adjustment of internal migrant university students.
中国流动大学生横向与纵向个人主义、集体主义及其与适应的关系:量表验证与探索性调查
中国被广泛认为是一个多元文化的大国,在中国境内的移民通常需要跨文化的调整,特别是对于那些离开熟悉的家乡去新环境的大学生。几十年来,许多变量被确定为跨文化适应的预测因素,但主要的价值模式在这一领域得到了名义上的关注。本研究首先验证了当代中国语境下的个人主义与集体主义量表(INDCOL)和学术与社会适应量表,探讨了横向和纵向个人主义与国内流动大学生跨文化适应的关系。采用问卷调查法对多元文化城市上海的1296名外来大学生进行调查。首先,通过探索性因子分析(EFA)、验证性因子分析(CFA)、效度检验、信度检验和测量不变性检验对上述两个量表的中文版进行检验。在此基础上,对中文版INDCOL (INDCOL- c)中四个数值维度的差异进行了检验。最后,以这四个价值维度为自变量,以跨文化适应的两个成分(学术适应和社会适应)为因变量,进行多元回归分析。上述两种工具在中文语境中得到了验证。横向个人主义是当今中国大学生最强烈的价值倾向。横向和纵向的个人主义和集体主义都能预测外来大学生的跨文化适应。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
14.30%
发文量
122
期刊介绍: IJIR is dedicated to advancing knowledge and understanding of theory, practice, and research in intergroup relations. The contents encompass theoretical developments, field-based evaluations of training techniques, empirical discussions of cultural similarities and differences, and critical descriptions of new training approaches. Papers selected for publication in IJIR are judged to increase our understanding of intergroup tensions and harmony. Issue-oriented and cross-discipline discussion is encouraged. The highest priority is given to manuscripts that join theory, practice, and field research design. By theory, we mean conceptual schemes focused on the nature of cultural differences and similarities.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信