Enhancing sustainability in semi-arid rangelands through grazing capacity simulation using fuzzy logic

IF 2.5 3区 环境科学与生态学 Q2 BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION
Azin Zarei , Ali Goharnejad , Pejman Tahmasebi , Hamid Mohammadi Nasrabadi
{"title":"Enhancing sustainability in semi-arid rangelands through grazing capacity simulation using fuzzy logic","authors":"Azin Zarei ,&nbsp;Ali Goharnejad ,&nbsp;Pejman Tahmasebi ,&nbsp;Hamid Mohammadi Nasrabadi","doi":"10.1016/j.jnc.2025.127096","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Accurate estimation of grazing capacity is critical for sustainable rangeland management, yet remains challenging in semi-arid systems due to spatial heterogeneity and data uncertainty. This study applied an Adaptive Neuro-Fuzzy Inference System (ANFIS) to predict grazing capacity in semi-steppe rangelands of northwest Iran and eastern Turkey. Four ecologically relevant inputs—slope, forage production, water supply distance, and soil resistance to erosion—were used as predictors. Forage production was derived from NDVI–biomass calibration (R2 = 0.72, RMSE = 58.3 kg/ha), and unsuitable areas (slope &gt; 60 %, biomass &lt; 50 kg/ha) were excluded. The ANFIS model was implemented in MATLAB using Gaussian membership functions (three per input), a cluster radius of 0.35, and 16 fuzzy rules. Model evaluation showed strong performance on training data (NRMSE = 4.7 %) but a substantially higher error on testing data (NRMSE = 19.2 %), indicating potential overfitting and spatial heterogeneity effects. Spatial outputs classified the study area into five grazing capacity categories, with higher capacities in western and southern zones and lower capacities in central regions. Comparison with vegetation-type classifications highlighted differences arising from ANFIS’s integration of multiple drivers beyond forage biomass. While results demonstrate the promise of neuro-fuzzy approaches for handling uncertain datasets and capturing spatial variability, we emphasize that outputs should be interpreted as indicative patterns rather than prescriptive management recommendations. Future work should integrate field validation, benchmark against simpler models, and incorporate dynamic factors such as drought and livestock species differences to enhance ecological realism.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":54898,"journal":{"name":"Journal for Nature Conservation","volume":"89 ","pages":"Article 127096"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal for Nature Conservation","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1617138125002730","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Accurate estimation of grazing capacity is critical for sustainable rangeland management, yet remains challenging in semi-arid systems due to spatial heterogeneity and data uncertainty. This study applied an Adaptive Neuro-Fuzzy Inference System (ANFIS) to predict grazing capacity in semi-steppe rangelands of northwest Iran and eastern Turkey. Four ecologically relevant inputs—slope, forage production, water supply distance, and soil resistance to erosion—were used as predictors. Forage production was derived from NDVI–biomass calibration (R2 = 0.72, RMSE = 58.3 kg/ha), and unsuitable areas (slope > 60 %, biomass < 50 kg/ha) were excluded. The ANFIS model was implemented in MATLAB using Gaussian membership functions (three per input), a cluster radius of 0.35, and 16 fuzzy rules. Model evaluation showed strong performance on training data (NRMSE = 4.7 %) but a substantially higher error on testing data (NRMSE = 19.2 %), indicating potential overfitting and spatial heterogeneity effects. Spatial outputs classified the study area into five grazing capacity categories, with higher capacities in western and southern zones and lower capacities in central regions. Comparison with vegetation-type classifications highlighted differences arising from ANFIS’s integration of multiple drivers beyond forage biomass. While results demonstrate the promise of neuro-fuzzy approaches for handling uncertain datasets and capturing spatial variability, we emphasize that outputs should be interpreted as indicative patterns rather than prescriptive management recommendations. Future work should integrate field validation, benchmark against simpler models, and incorporate dynamic factors such as drought and livestock species differences to enhance ecological realism.
基于模糊逻辑的半干旱草地放牧能力模拟提高可持续性
准确估计放牧能力对可持续牧场管理至关重要,但由于空间异质性和数据不确定性,在半干旱系统中仍然具有挑战性。本研究应用自适应神经模糊推理系统(ANFIS)对伊朗西北部和土耳其东部半草原放牧区的放牧能力进行了预测。4个生态相关投入——坡度、饲料产量、供水距离和土壤抗侵蚀能力——被用作预测因子。饲料产量来源于ndvi -生物量校准(R2 = 0.72, RMSE = 58.3 kg/ha),排除不适宜区域(坡度60%,生物量50 kg/ha)。在MATLAB中使用高斯隶属函数(每个输入三个),聚类半径为0.35,16条模糊规则实现ANFIS模型。模型评估在训练数据(NRMSE = 4.7%)上表现良好,但在测试数据(NRMSE = 19.2%)上的误差要高得多,表明可能存在过拟合和空间异质性效应。空间输出结果将研究区划分为5个放牧能力类型,西部和南部地区放牧能力较高,中部地区放牧能力较低。与植被类型分类的比较突出了ANFIS整合饲料生物量以外的多个驱动因素所产生的差异。虽然结果表明神经模糊方法有望处理不确定的数据集和捕获空间变异性,但我们强调,输出应被解释为指示性模式,而不是规定性的管理建议。未来的工作应结合实地验证,以更简单的模型为基准,并纳入干旱和牲畜物种差异等动态因素,以增强生态现实性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal for Nature Conservation
Journal for Nature Conservation 环境科学-生态学
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
5.00%
发文量
151
审稿时长
7.9 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal for Nature Conservation addresses concepts, methods and techniques for nature conservation. This international and interdisciplinary journal encourages collaboration between scientists and practitioners, including the integration of biodiversity issues with social and economic concepts. Therefore, conceptual, technical and methodological papers, as well as reviews, research papers, and short communications are welcomed from a wide range of disciplines, including theoretical ecology, landscape ecology, restoration ecology, ecological modelling, and others, provided that there is a clear connection and immediate relevance to nature conservation. Manuscripts without any immediate conservation context, such as inventories, distribution modelling, genetic studies, animal behaviour, plant physiology, will not be considered for this journal; though such data may be useful for conservationists and managers in the future, this is outside of the current scope of the journal.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信