Piecing together the puzzle: A mixed methods study of the Abecedarian Intervention

IF 3.1 1区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Kylie L. Garber , Margaret Burchinal , Sylvi Kuperman , Tiffany J. Foster , Frances Campbell , Craig Ramey
{"title":"Piecing together the puzzle: A mixed methods study of the Abecedarian Intervention","authors":"Kylie L. Garber ,&nbsp;Margaret Burchinal ,&nbsp;Sylvi Kuperman ,&nbsp;Tiffany J. Foster ,&nbsp;Frances Campbell ,&nbsp;Craig Ramey","doi":"10.1016/j.ecresq.2025.08.009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The Abecedarian Study (ABC) has been integral to demonstrating the impacts of Early Care and Education (ECE). It is important to understand the practices and mechanisms through which ABC had impacts on later outcomes, but a lack of implementation data limits our understanding of program mechanisms. The present study took a mixed methods approach to describe the mechanisms of the original ABC program. The qualitative study provides a detailed description of the ABC program based on historical program documentation and retrospective interview responses of ABC teachers and staff. The teachers and staff reported individualized coaching, child-centered environments and activities, and frequent teacher-child conversations were common in ABC classrooms. Informed by qualitative results, a mediation analysis was conducted with the original ABC sample (<em>n</em> = 111). Analyses suggest that verbal skills at entry to school were the primary mechanism for ABC impacts on adult education and income. These findings suggest that ECE programs that focus on improving verbal skills, perhaps through child-centered activities and frequent teacher-child conversation may be more likely to have longer-term impacts.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48348,"journal":{"name":"Early Childhood Research Quarterly","volume":"74 ","pages":"Pages 149-163"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Early Childhood Research Quarterly","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0885200625000894","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The Abecedarian Study (ABC) has been integral to demonstrating the impacts of Early Care and Education (ECE). It is important to understand the practices and mechanisms through which ABC had impacts on later outcomes, but a lack of implementation data limits our understanding of program mechanisms. The present study took a mixed methods approach to describe the mechanisms of the original ABC program. The qualitative study provides a detailed description of the ABC program based on historical program documentation and retrospective interview responses of ABC teachers and staff. The teachers and staff reported individualized coaching, child-centered environments and activities, and frequent teacher-child conversations were common in ABC classrooms. Informed by qualitative results, a mediation analysis was conducted with the original ABC sample (n = 111). Analyses suggest that verbal skills at entry to school were the primary mechanism for ABC impacts on adult education and income. These findings suggest that ECE programs that focus on improving verbal skills, perhaps through child-centered activities and frequent teacher-child conversation may be more likely to have longer-term impacts.
拼凑拼图:初级干预的混合方法研究
学前教育研究(ABC)是证明早期护理和教育(ECE)的影响不可或缺的一部分。了解ABC对后来的结果产生影响的实践和机制是很重要的,但是缺乏实施数据限制了我们对程序机制的理解。本研究采用混合方法来描述原始ABC节目的机制。本质性研究以ABC节目的历史文献资料和ABC教师及职员的回溯性访谈回应为基础,提供ABC节目的详细描述。教师和工作人员报告说,在ABC课堂上,个性化指导、以儿童为中心的环境和活动以及频繁的师生对话是很常见的。根据定性结果,对原始ABC样本(n = 111)进行中介分析。分析表明,入学时的语言技能是ABC对成人教育和收入影响的主要机制。这些发现表明,通过以儿童为中心的活动和频繁的师生对话,专注于提高语言技能的ECE项目可能更有可能产生长期影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.00
自引率
8.10%
发文量
109
期刊介绍: For over twenty years, Early Childhood Research Quarterly (ECRQ) has influenced the field of early childhood education and development through the publication of empirical research that meets the highest standards of scholarly and practical significance. ECRQ publishes predominantly empirical research (quantitative or qualitative methods) on issues of interest to early childhood development, theory, and educational practice (Birth through 8 years of age). The journal also occasionally publishes practitioner and/or policy perspectives, book reviews, and significant reviews of research. As an applied journal, we are interested in work that has social, policy, and educational relevance and implications and work that strengthens links between research and practice.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信