{"title":"Joint optimization of capacity expansion timing and increment in airport terminals: addressing stochastic demand and logistic growth","authors":"Ziyue Li , Qianwen (Vivian) Guo , Paul Schonfeld","doi":"10.1016/j.trc.2025.105347","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Airport terminal capacity expansion planning is important yet challenging due to the stochastic factors inherent in long-term passenger demand growth. Existing studies often assume exponential demand growth, which can oversimplify real-world dynamics. For instance, passenger demand at Phoenix Sky Harbor International Airport (PHX) initially experienced exponential growth, but the demand growth rate has slowed. This trend is more accurately captured by a stochastic logistic growth process. In this paper, we propose a framework that jointly optimizes two related decisions: the expansion timing and the capacity increment, to maximize expected cumulative cost savings under stochastic logistic demand growth. Recognizing that airport authorities hold an “option” to invest in capacity expansion, granting them the right but not the obligation to do so, we adopt a real options approach. Numerical experiments for PHX validate the approach, revealing a congestion effect where added capacity initially reduces congestion and increases cost savings; but as demand approaches the expanded capacity, cost savings decline. Additionally, findings suggest interrelations between variables: a higher demand growth rate correlates with a smaller trigger demand but a larger capacity level, while higher volatility rates result in larger values for both trigger demand and capacity level. Compared to capacity expansion decisions under geometric Brownian motion (GBM) demand modeling, which tends to overestimate future demand growth, our approach better captures long-term saturation effects and provides more realistic results. This methodology can be effectively applied to other capacity expansion planning and investment decision problems in transportation.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":54417,"journal":{"name":"Transportation Research Part C-Emerging Technologies","volume":"180 ","pages":"Article 105347"},"PeriodicalIF":7.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transportation Research Part C-Emerging Technologies","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0968090X25003511","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"TRANSPORTATION SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Airport terminal capacity expansion planning is important yet challenging due to the stochastic factors inherent in long-term passenger demand growth. Existing studies often assume exponential demand growth, which can oversimplify real-world dynamics. For instance, passenger demand at Phoenix Sky Harbor International Airport (PHX) initially experienced exponential growth, but the demand growth rate has slowed. This trend is more accurately captured by a stochastic logistic growth process. In this paper, we propose a framework that jointly optimizes two related decisions: the expansion timing and the capacity increment, to maximize expected cumulative cost savings under stochastic logistic demand growth. Recognizing that airport authorities hold an “option” to invest in capacity expansion, granting them the right but not the obligation to do so, we adopt a real options approach. Numerical experiments for PHX validate the approach, revealing a congestion effect where added capacity initially reduces congestion and increases cost savings; but as demand approaches the expanded capacity, cost savings decline. Additionally, findings suggest interrelations between variables: a higher demand growth rate correlates with a smaller trigger demand but a larger capacity level, while higher volatility rates result in larger values for both trigger demand and capacity level. Compared to capacity expansion decisions under geometric Brownian motion (GBM) demand modeling, which tends to overestimate future demand growth, our approach better captures long-term saturation effects and provides more realistic results. This methodology can be effectively applied to other capacity expansion planning and investment decision problems in transportation.
期刊介绍:
Transportation Research: Part C (TR_C) is dedicated to showcasing high-quality, scholarly research that delves into the development, applications, and implications of transportation systems and emerging technologies. Our focus lies not solely on individual technologies, but rather on their broader implications for the planning, design, operation, control, maintenance, and rehabilitation of transportation systems, services, and components. In essence, the intellectual core of the journal revolves around the transportation aspect rather than the technology itself. We actively encourage the integration of quantitative methods from diverse fields such as operations research, control systems, complex networks, computer science, and artificial intelligence. Join us in exploring the intersection of transportation systems and emerging technologies to drive innovation and progress in the field.