The perspectives of healthcare professionals regarding interprofessional collaboration among three tertiary hospitals in the Tshwane district, Gauteng

Q3 Social Sciences
Nontembiso Magida , Kirsten Hellberg , Charmari Kotze , Kgopotso Mathume , Thuto Molapo , Lara Moolman , Bianke Schoeman , Marien Alet Graham
{"title":"The perspectives of healthcare professionals regarding interprofessional collaboration among three tertiary hospitals in the Tshwane district, Gauteng","authors":"Nontembiso Magida ,&nbsp;Kirsten Hellberg ,&nbsp;Charmari Kotze ,&nbsp;Kgopotso Mathume ,&nbsp;Thuto Molapo ,&nbsp;Lara Moolman ,&nbsp;Bianke Schoeman ,&nbsp;Marien Alet Graham","doi":"10.1016/j.xjep.2025.100769","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Healthcare professionals' perspectives on interprofessional collaboration differ, although structured organisational environments and professional relationships remain essential for quality healthcare. We aimed to determine healthcare professionals' perspectives regarding interprofessional collaboration in tertiary hospitals in Gauteng, South Africa. Healthcare professionals older than 18 participated in this cross-sectional survey, conducted in Tshwane district. Snowball sampling recruited registered healthcare professionals who worked more than a week at the participating hospitals. A Google link with a consent form and questionnaire was shared with departmental heads to share with their co-workers; 77 people completed the questionnaires. All ethical principles were followed. Statistical Package for Social Science version-27 analysed data. A five-point Likert scale determined perspectives of healthcare professionals’ level of collaboration. A signed-rank test determined the significant difference between hospitals' personal and organisational factors. The participants perceived personal relationships among healthcare professionals as better than the organisational environment in interprofessional collaboration. The organisational environment requires improvement for better collaboration.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":37998,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Interprofessional Education and Practice","volume":"41 ","pages":"Article 100769"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Interprofessional Education and Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2405452625000321","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Healthcare professionals' perspectives on interprofessional collaboration differ, although structured organisational environments and professional relationships remain essential for quality healthcare. We aimed to determine healthcare professionals' perspectives regarding interprofessional collaboration in tertiary hospitals in Gauteng, South Africa. Healthcare professionals older than 18 participated in this cross-sectional survey, conducted in Tshwane district. Snowball sampling recruited registered healthcare professionals who worked more than a week at the participating hospitals. A Google link with a consent form and questionnaire was shared with departmental heads to share with their co-workers; 77 people completed the questionnaires. All ethical principles were followed. Statistical Package for Social Science version-27 analysed data. A five-point Likert scale determined perspectives of healthcare professionals’ level of collaboration. A signed-rank test determined the significant difference between hospitals' personal and organisational factors. The participants perceived personal relationships among healthcare professionals as better than the organisational environment in interprofessional collaboration. The organisational environment requires improvement for better collaboration.
保健专业人员对豪登省茨瓦内区三家三级医院间专业合作的看法
尽管结构化的组织环境和专业关系对于高质量的医疗保健仍然至关重要,但医疗保健专业人员对跨专业协作的看法不同。我们的目的是确定医疗保健专业人员对南非豪登省三级医院跨专业合作的看法。18岁以上的卫生保健专业人员参加了在茨瓦内区进行的这项横断面调查。雪球抽样招募了在参与医院工作超过一周的注册医疗保健专业人员。一个谷歌的链接,连同同意表格和问卷,分享给部门主管,让他们与同事分享;77人完成了调查问卷。所有的伦理原则都得到了遵守。统计包社会科学版27分析数据。李克特五点量表决定了医疗保健专业人员合作水平的观点。sign -rank检验确定了医院个人因素和组织因素之间的显著差异。参与者认为医疗保健专业人员之间的个人关系比跨专业合作的组织环境更好。为了更好地协作,组织环境需要改进。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
80
期刊介绍: Journal of Interprofessional Education & Practice, a quarterly online-only journal, provides innovative ideas for interprofessional educators and practitioners through peer-reviewed articles and reports. Each issue examines current issues and trends in interprofessional healthcare topics, offering progressive solutions to the challenges facing the profession. The Journal of Interprofessional Education & Practice (JIEP) is affiliated with University of Nebraska Medical Center and the official journal of National Academies of Practice (NAP) and supports its mission to serve the public and the health profession by advancing education, policy, practice & research.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信