A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials on the effect of various therapeutic interventions on sacroiliac joint dysfunction

IF 1.4 Q3 REHABILITATION
Pinky Jangra , Jaspreet Kaur , Manoj Malik , Monika Rani
{"title":"A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials on the effect of various therapeutic interventions on sacroiliac joint dysfunction","authors":"Pinky Jangra ,&nbsp;Jaspreet Kaur ,&nbsp;Manoj Malik ,&nbsp;Monika Rani","doi":"10.1016/j.jbmt.2025.09.019","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background and objective</h3><div>Sacroiliac joint dysfunction is the most common condition associated with low back pain which leads to pain and disability. Therefore, the aim of this study was to perform a systematic review and meta-analysis on efficacy of physical therapy interventions in sacroiliac joint dysfunction.</div></div><div><h3>Methodology</h3><div>Randomized controlled trials on sacroiliac joint dysfunction, using physiotherapy as an intervention were evaluated for changes in pain and disability. Three different towere searched to find out the relevant studies using Advanced search strategy. The methodological quality of the studies was assessed by PEDro scale and Cochrane risk of bias tool. For meta-analysis, mean and standard deviation value were extracted from each study and analyzed as a random effect model on four interventions that are muscle energy technique, mobilization, exercises, and taping. Review manager 5.3 software was used.</div></div><div><h3>Result</h3><div>The result of the study showed a statistically significant improvement of muscle energy technique on pain (−1.88, p = 0.009) and mobilization on pain (−0.90, p = 0.003), exercise on pain (−1.13, p = 0.004), and exercise on disability (−5.37, p &lt; 0.001). However, there was non-significant result of taping on pain and muscle energy technique, mobilization and taping on disability.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>It can be concluded that physiotherapy interventions are effective in managing the pain, and restoring the functional disability of the patients suffering from sacroiliac joint dysfunction. MET and Exercises were found to be more effective in reducing pain than Mobilization in treating sacroiliac joint dysfunction and only Exercises are effective in improving the disability in SIJD. Therefore a combined approach may be more beneficial.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":51431,"journal":{"name":"JOURNAL OF BODYWORK AND MOVEMENT THERAPIES","volume":"45 ","pages":"Pages 627-638"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JOURNAL OF BODYWORK AND MOVEMENT THERAPIES","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1360859225003663","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and objective

Sacroiliac joint dysfunction is the most common condition associated with low back pain which leads to pain and disability. Therefore, the aim of this study was to perform a systematic review and meta-analysis on efficacy of physical therapy interventions in sacroiliac joint dysfunction.

Methodology

Randomized controlled trials on sacroiliac joint dysfunction, using physiotherapy as an intervention were evaluated for changes in pain and disability. Three different towere searched to find out the relevant studies using Advanced search strategy. The methodological quality of the studies was assessed by PEDro scale and Cochrane risk of bias tool. For meta-analysis, mean and standard deviation value were extracted from each study and analyzed as a random effect model on four interventions that are muscle energy technique, mobilization, exercises, and taping. Review manager 5.3 software was used.

Result

The result of the study showed a statistically significant improvement of muscle energy technique on pain (−1.88, p = 0.009) and mobilization on pain (−0.90, p = 0.003), exercise on pain (−1.13, p = 0.004), and exercise on disability (−5.37, p < 0.001). However, there was non-significant result of taping on pain and muscle energy technique, mobilization and taping on disability.

Conclusion

It can be concluded that physiotherapy interventions are effective in managing the pain, and restoring the functional disability of the patients suffering from sacroiliac joint dysfunction. MET and Exercises were found to be more effective in reducing pain than Mobilization in treating sacroiliac joint dysfunction and only Exercises are effective in improving the disability in SIJD. Therefore a combined approach may be more beneficial.
对各种治疗干预措施对骶髂关节功能障碍影响的随机对照试验进行系统回顾和荟萃分析
背景与目的骶髂关节功能障碍是腰痛最常见的相关疾病,可导致疼痛和残疾。因此,本研究的目的是对物理治疗干预骶髂关节功能障碍的疗效进行系统回顾和荟萃分析。方法:对骶髂关节功能障碍的随机对照试验,采用物理治疗作为干预,评估疼痛和残疾的变化。运用高级检索策略对三个不同的文献进行检索,找出相关的研究。采用PEDro量表和Cochrane偏倚风险工具评估研究的方法学质量。为了进行meta分析,从每个研究中提取平均值和标准差值,并作为四种干预措施的随机效应模型进行分析,这四种干预措施是肌肉能量技术、动员、锻炼和胶带。使用Review manager 5.3软件。结果肌肉能量技术对疼痛(- 1.88,p = 0.009)、运动对疼痛(- 0.90,p = 0.003)、运动对疼痛(- 1.13,p = 0.004)、运动对残疾(- 5.37,p < 0.001)的改善有统计学意义。然而,在疼痛和肌肉能量技术、动员和残疾方面,没有显著的结果。结论物理治疗干预对骶髂关节功能障碍患者疼痛的控制和功能障碍的恢复是有效的。在治疗骶髂关节功能障碍方面,MET和运动比运动更有效地减轻疼痛,只有运动能有效地改善骶髂关节功能障碍。因此,一个联合的方法可能更有益。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
133
审稿时长
321 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Bodywork and Movement Therapies brings you the latest therapeutic techniques and current professional debate. Publishing highly illustrated articles on a wide range of subjects this journal is immediately relevant to everyday clinical practice in private, community and primary health care settings. Techiques featured include: • Physical Therapy • Osteopathy • Chiropractic • Massage Therapy • Structural Integration • Feldenkrais • Yoga Therapy • Dance • Physiotherapy • Pilates • Alexander Technique • Shiatsu and Tuina
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信