{"title":"Reliability assessment of the static balance parameters based on center of pressure in different age groups of healthy participants","authors":"Elham Hazrati, Mahmood-Reza Azghani, Samin Asghari","doi":"10.1016/j.jbmt.2025.09.003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>This study evaluates the reliability of balance parameters for both men and women, across 8 age subgroups while standing with eyes open.</div></div><div><h3>Design</h3><div>Cross-sectional study.</div></div><div><h3>Setting</h3><div>Foot Anthropometry Research Center.</div></div><div><h3>Participants</h3><div>Healthy subjects (1582 men and 786 women) aged 20–60 years.</div></div><div><h3>Interventions</h3><div>Not applicable.</div></div><div><h3>Main outcome measures</h3><div>Center of pressure data were recorded using a pressure platform during three 10-s trials. Based on this, fifteen balance parameters were calculated via MATLAB (R2015b). The intraclass correlation coefficient assessed reliability using SPSS (26). Additionally, the standard error of measurement, minimum detectable change, and percentage coefficient of variation were determined with MATLAB. An independent <em>t</em>-test evaluated gender differences in minimum detectable change, with Bonferroni correction applied to control for Type I error.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The parameters demonstrated substantial reliability for women and most for men across age groups, indicating strong reproducibility. Most parameters exhibited a coefficient of variation near 30 %. Significant gender differences in minimum detectable change were observed for parameters such as the anterior-posterior range, root mean square distance in anterior-posterior and medial-lateral directions, and planar phase; however, these differences were not statistically significant after Bonferroni correction.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>It is recommended that future research employ these parameters for comparative analyses of postural balance under different test conditions between men and women. This will help determine whether significant gender differences exist in balance performance.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":51431,"journal":{"name":"JOURNAL OF BODYWORK AND MOVEMENT THERAPIES","volume":"45 ","pages":"Pages 583-597"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JOURNAL OF BODYWORK AND MOVEMENT THERAPIES","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1360859225003407","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective
This study evaluates the reliability of balance parameters for both men and women, across 8 age subgroups while standing with eyes open.
Design
Cross-sectional study.
Setting
Foot Anthropometry Research Center.
Participants
Healthy subjects (1582 men and 786 women) aged 20–60 years.
Interventions
Not applicable.
Main outcome measures
Center of pressure data were recorded using a pressure platform during three 10-s trials. Based on this, fifteen balance parameters were calculated via MATLAB (R2015b). The intraclass correlation coefficient assessed reliability using SPSS (26). Additionally, the standard error of measurement, minimum detectable change, and percentage coefficient of variation were determined with MATLAB. An independent t-test evaluated gender differences in minimum detectable change, with Bonferroni correction applied to control for Type I error.
Results
The parameters demonstrated substantial reliability for women and most for men across age groups, indicating strong reproducibility. Most parameters exhibited a coefficient of variation near 30 %. Significant gender differences in minimum detectable change were observed for parameters such as the anterior-posterior range, root mean square distance in anterior-posterior and medial-lateral directions, and planar phase; however, these differences were not statistically significant after Bonferroni correction.
Conclusion
It is recommended that future research employ these parameters for comparative analyses of postural balance under different test conditions between men and women. This will help determine whether significant gender differences exist in balance performance.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Bodywork and Movement Therapies brings you the latest therapeutic techniques and current professional debate. Publishing highly illustrated articles on a wide range of subjects this journal is immediately relevant to everyday clinical practice in private, community and primary health care settings. Techiques featured include: • Physical Therapy • Osteopathy • Chiropractic • Massage Therapy • Structural Integration • Feldenkrais • Yoga Therapy • Dance • Physiotherapy • Pilates • Alexander Technique • Shiatsu and Tuina