Predicting maternal health risk using PCA-enhanced XGBoost and SMOTE-ENN for improved healthcare outcomes

Rahmatul Kabir Rasel Sarker , Sadman Hafij , Md Adib Yasir , Md Assaduzzaman , Md Monir Hossain Shimul , Md Kamrul Hossain
{"title":"Predicting maternal health risk using PCA-enhanced XGBoost and SMOTE-ENN for improved healthcare outcomes","authors":"Rahmatul Kabir Rasel Sarker ,&nbsp;Sadman Hafij ,&nbsp;Md Adib Yasir ,&nbsp;Md Assaduzzaman ,&nbsp;Md Monir Hossain Shimul ,&nbsp;Md Kamrul Hossain","doi":"10.1016/j.ibmed.2025.100300","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Maternal health remains a global priority, especially in low-resource settings where timely risk identification is critical. Traditional machine learning models often suffer from poor generalizability, data imbalance, and computational inefficiencies. This study proposes an enhanced predictive model combining SMOTE-ENN data balancing and Principal Component Analysis (PCA) with XGBoost to improve maternal risk classification accuracy using minimal, easily collectible clinical features.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>The dataset of 1014 maternal health records comprising seven physiological features was sourced from a public repository. Preprocessing involved standardization, label encoding, and class balancing using SMOTE-ENN. PCA was applied for dimensionality reduction to enhance computational performance and reduce overfitting. Several machine learning classifiers including Decision Tree, Random Forest, LightGBM, Gradient Boosting, and SVM were evaluated, with XGBoost selected as the final model. Performance metrics included accuracy, precision, recall, F1-score, ROC-AUC, and 10-fold cross-validation.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The PCA-enhanced XGBoost model achieved the highest accuracy (97.73 %), precision (98 %), recall (98 %), and F1-score (98 %). It outperformed all other models, particularly in identifying high-risk cases with minimal false negatives. Cross-validation confirmed the model's robustness (mean accuracy: 98.39 %), and ROC-AUC scores exceeded 0.998 for all classes, indicating near-perfect classification performance.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>This study validates a maternal health risk prediction model that is scalable for use in resource-constrained environments and interpretable within the limitations of the selected dimensionality-reduction approach. Its simplicity, high accuracy, and generalizability make it a promising tool for early clinical decision-making and intervention.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":73399,"journal":{"name":"Intelligence-based medicine","volume":"12 ","pages":"Article 100300"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Intelligence-based medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666521225001048","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Maternal health remains a global priority, especially in low-resource settings where timely risk identification is critical. Traditional machine learning models often suffer from poor generalizability, data imbalance, and computational inefficiencies. This study proposes an enhanced predictive model combining SMOTE-ENN data balancing and Principal Component Analysis (PCA) with XGBoost to improve maternal risk classification accuracy using minimal, easily collectible clinical features.

Methods

The dataset of 1014 maternal health records comprising seven physiological features was sourced from a public repository. Preprocessing involved standardization, label encoding, and class balancing using SMOTE-ENN. PCA was applied for dimensionality reduction to enhance computational performance and reduce overfitting. Several machine learning classifiers including Decision Tree, Random Forest, LightGBM, Gradient Boosting, and SVM were evaluated, with XGBoost selected as the final model. Performance metrics included accuracy, precision, recall, F1-score, ROC-AUC, and 10-fold cross-validation.

Results

The PCA-enhanced XGBoost model achieved the highest accuracy (97.73 %), precision (98 %), recall (98 %), and F1-score (98 %). It outperformed all other models, particularly in identifying high-risk cases with minimal false negatives. Cross-validation confirmed the model's robustness (mean accuracy: 98.39 %), and ROC-AUC scores exceeded 0.998 for all classes, indicating near-perfect classification performance.

Conclusion

This study validates a maternal health risk prediction model that is scalable for use in resource-constrained environments and interpretable within the limitations of the selected dimensionality-reduction approach. Its simplicity, high accuracy, and generalizability make it a promising tool for early clinical decision-making and intervention.
使用pca增强的XGBoost和SMOTE-ENN预测孕产妇健康风险,以改善医疗保健结果
产妇保健仍然是全球优先事项,特别是在资源匮乏的环境中,及时识别风险至关重要。传统的机器学习模型通常存在泛化能力差、数据不平衡和计算效率低下的问题。本研究提出了一个增强的预测模型,结合SMOTE-ENN数据平衡和主成分分析(PCA)与XGBoost,利用最小的、易于收集的临床特征来提高孕产妇风险分类的准确性。方法从公共信息库中获取1014份孕产妇健康记录,包括7项生理特征。预处理包括使用SMOTE-ENN进行标准化、标签编码和类平衡。采用主成分分析法进行降维,提高计算性能,减少过拟合。对决策树、随机森林、LightGBM、梯度增强和支持向量机等几种机器学习分类器进行了评估,最终选择XGBoost作为最终模型。性能指标包括准确性、精密度、召回率、f1评分、ROC-AUC和10倍交叉验证。结果pca增强的XGBoost模型具有最高的准确率(97.73%)、精密度(98%)、召回率(98%)和f1评分(98%)。它优于所有其他模型,特别是在识别高风险病例时,以最小的假阴性。交叉验证证实了模型的稳健性(平均准确率为98.39%),所有类别的ROC-AUC得分均超过0.998,表明分类性能接近完美。结论:本研究验证了一种产妇健康风险预测模型,该模型可扩展用于资源受限环境,并可在所选降维方法的限制下解释。它的简单,高精度和可推广性使其成为早期临床决策和干预的有前途的工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Intelligence-based medicine
Intelligence-based medicine Health Informatics
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
187 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信