SWATH-MS proteomics data on differentially abundant proteins between normal and dark-cutting beef

IF 1.4 Q3 MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES
Laura González-Blanco , Mamen Oliván , Yolanda Diñeiro , Susana B. Bravo , Verónica Sierra , Mohammed Gagaoua
{"title":"SWATH-MS proteomics data on differentially abundant proteins between normal and dark-cutting beef","authors":"Laura González-Blanco ,&nbsp;Mamen Oliván ,&nbsp;Yolanda Diñeiro ,&nbsp;Susana B. Bravo ,&nbsp;Verónica Sierra ,&nbsp;Mohammed Gagaoua","doi":"10.1016/j.dib.2025.112099","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Dark, firm, and dry (DFD) beef, also known as dark-cutting beef, lead to economic losses, food waste, and potential consumer rejection due to its very dark color at the point of sale. This condition is associated with a high ultimate pH, a limited blooming capacity, a redder cooked color that appears undercooked, and increased spoilage rates. Although several pre-slaughter factors have been linked to high ultimate pH, the mechanisms underlying DFD beef remain complex, multifactorial and not yet fully understood [1]. Proteomic approaches on <em>post-mortem</em> muscles have increasingly been employed to unravel the molecular mechanisms and biological pathways underlying this quality defect and to identify candidate protein biomarkers for its early prediction or better characterization using explanatory models. In this study, SWATH-MS proteomics, a data-independent acquisition strategy, was applied for the first time for an in-depth characterization and quantification of <em>post-mortem</em> muscle proteomes. The analysis was conducted using the most extensive dataset available to date on this quality defect conditions, which included 26 DFD beef samples (pH<sub>24</sub> ≥ 6.2) and 26 CONTROL samples (5.4 ≤ pH<sub>24</sub> ≤ 5.6). Muscle samples from the <em>Longissimus thoracis et lumborum</em> of <em>Asturiana de los Valles</em> yearling bulls were collected at 24 h <em>post-mortem</em> to investigate protein expression differences associated with DFD beef condition. A total of 735 proteins were quantified, among which 35 exhibited a significant difference in their abundances between the DFD condition and CONTROL samples, suggesting their potential as putative biomarkers for DFD beef.</div><div>The data provided in this article can facilitate further research into beef quality defects and are available for reuse and/or reprocess and/or integration to support the development of early prediction tools for DFD beef. These data could further contribute to previous integrative studies [1], in the frame of integromics. Those approaches aimed combining multiple public proteomics datasets and DFD proteomics studies in a unique repository with the ultimate objective of refining the selection of dark-cutting beef biomarkers and deepen our understanding on the underlying biological mechanisms, hence revealing novel patterns inaccessible from individual datasets [1]. A more detailed analysis of this dataset is available in the study published by González-Blanco et al. [2]. The mass spectrometry (MS) proteomics data generated using a sequential window acquisition of all theoretical mass spectra (SWATH-MS) have been deposited to the ProteomeXchange Consortium (<span><span>http://proteomecentral.proteomexchange.org</span><svg><path></path></svg></span>) via the PRIDE partner repository [3] with the dataset identifier PXD059876.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":10973,"journal":{"name":"Data in Brief","volume":"63 ","pages":"Article 112099"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Data in Brief","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352340925008212","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Dark, firm, and dry (DFD) beef, also known as dark-cutting beef, lead to economic losses, food waste, and potential consumer rejection due to its very dark color at the point of sale. This condition is associated with a high ultimate pH, a limited blooming capacity, a redder cooked color that appears undercooked, and increased spoilage rates. Although several pre-slaughter factors have been linked to high ultimate pH, the mechanisms underlying DFD beef remain complex, multifactorial and not yet fully understood [1]. Proteomic approaches on post-mortem muscles have increasingly been employed to unravel the molecular mechanisms and biological pathways underlying this quality defect and to identify candidate protein biomarkers for its early prediction or better characterization using explanatory models. In this study, SWATH-MS proteomics, a data-independent acquisition strategy, was applied for the first time for an in-depth characterization and quantification of post-mortem muscle proteomes. The analysis was conducted using the most extensive dataset available to date on this quality defect conditions, which included 26 DFD beef samples (pH24 ≥ 6.2) and 26 CONTROL samples (5.4 ≤ pH24 ≤ 5.6). Muscle samples from the Longissimus thoracis et lumborum of Asturiana de los Valles yearling bulls were collected at 24 h post-mortem to investigate protein expression differences associated with DFD beef condition. A total of 735 proteins were quantified, among which 35 exhibited a significant difference in their abundances between the DFD condition and CONTROL samples, suggesting their potential as putative biomarkers for DFD beef.
The data provided in this article can facilitate further research into beef quality defects and are available for reuse and/or reprocess and/or integration to support the development of early prediction tools for DFD beef. These data could further contribute to previous integrative studies [1], in the frame of integromics. Those approaches aimed combining multiple public proteomics datasets and DFD proteomics studies in a unique repository with the ultimate objective of refining the selection of dark-cutting beef biomarkers and deepen our understanding on the underlying biological mechanisms, hence revealing novel patterns inaccessible from individual datasets [1]. A more detailed analysis of this dataset is available in the study published by González-Blanco et al. [2]. The mass spectrometry (MS) proteomics data generated using a sequential window acquisition of all theoretical mass spectra (SWATH-MS) have been deposited to the ProteomeXchange Consortium (http://proteomecentral.proteomexchange.org) via the PRIDE partner repository [3] with the dataset identifier PXD059876.
正常和深切牛肉蛋白质丰度差异的SWATH-MS蛋白质组学数据
暗、硬、干(DFD)牛肉,也被称为暗切牛肉,由于其在销售点的颜色非常深,会导致经济损失、食物浪费和潜在的消费者拒绝。这种情况与最终pH值高、开花能力有限、煮熟后颜色变红(似乎未煮熟)和腐败率增加有关。尽管屠宰前的几个因素与高最终pH值有关,但DFD牛肉的潜在机制仍然复杂,多因素且尚未完全了解。死后肌肉的蛋白质组学方法越来越多地用于揭示这种质量缺陷的分子机制和生物学途径,并确定候选蛋白质生物标志物,以便使用解释模型进行早期预测或更好地表征。在这项研究中,SWATH-MS蛋白质组学,一种数据独立的获取策略,首次被用于深入表征和定量死后肌肉蛋白质组学。使用迄今为止最广泛的数据集对该质量缺陷条件进行了分析,其中包括26份DFD牛肉样品(pH24≥6.2)和26份对照样品(5.4≤pH24≤5.6)。在死后24 h采集阿斯图里亚纳牛的胸腰最长肌肌肉样本,以研究与DFD牛肉状况相关的蛋白质表达差异。共有735种蛋白被量化,其中35种蛋白的丰度在DFD条件下和对照样品中表现出显著差异,这表明它们有可能作为DFD牛肉的推定生物标志物。本文提供的数据可以促进对牛肉质量缺陷的进一步研究,并可用于重用和/或再加工和/或集成,以支持DFD牛肉早期预测工具的开发。这些数据可以在整合组学框架下进一步促进先前的整合研究。这些方法旨在将多个公共蛋白质组学数据集和DFD蛋白质组学研究结合在一个独特的存储库中,最终目的是改进深色切割牛肉生物标志物的选择,加深我们对潜在生物学机制的理解,从而揭示单个数据集[1]无法获得的新模式。对该数据集的更详细分析可在González-Blanco等人发表的研究中找到。使用所有理论质谱的顺序窗口采集(SWATH-MS)生成的质谱(MS)蛋白质组学数据已通过PRIDE合作伙伴存储库[3]存储到ProteomeXchange Consortium (http://proteomecentral.proteomexchange.org),数据集标识符为PXD059876。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Data in Brief
Data in Brief MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES-
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
996
审稿时长
70 days
期刊介绍: Data in Brief provides a way for researchers to easily share and reuse each other''s datasets by publishing data articles that: -Thoroughly describe your data, facilitating reproducibility. -Make your data, which is often buried in supplementary material, easier to find. -Increase traffic towards associated research articles and data, leading to more citations. -Open up doors for new collaborations. Because you never know what data will be useful to someone else, Data in Brief welcomes submissions that describe data from all research areas.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信