{"title":"Transient level determination with machine learning for pressurized water reactor VVER-1000","authors":"Ceyhun Yavuz, Senem Şentürk Lüle","doi":"10.1016/j.anucene.2025.111908","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Nuclear reactors carry significant risks of severe consequences in the event of accidents. Therefore, the imperative of ensuring their safe operation is paramount. During transient conditions, key parameter time series may fluctuate in ways that are not immediately visible. Therefore, the detection of these transients is essential for preventive measures and protective actions. This work focuses on identification of 53 transient sub-scenarios derived from reactivity insertion via rod withdrawal, steam leak from pressurizer, loss of flow and loss of coolant accidents affecting both hot and cold legs main transient for VVER type reactor. 91 features have been handled for model assessment with 465,465 data points. K-Nearest Neighbor, Decision Tree Classifier, Random Forest Classifier, Gradient Boosting, Logistic Regression, Support Vector Machine, Naïve Bayes and Multilayer Perceptron methods were applied for three different approaches. A one-step, two-steps, and grouped one-step approaches were considered for identification sub-scenarios. In the one-step approach, the exact sub-scenario (e.g. 25% rod withdrawal) was identified. In the two steps approach, the main transients (e.g. rod withdrawal) were identified first and then the sub-scenario (e.g. 25% rod withdrawal) were identified. In the grouped one-step approach, sub-scenarios were grouped (e.g. 20 to 30% rod withdrawal) to increase the accuracy of predictions. While the highest accuracy in one-step approach was 74.66%, two-steps approach had 99.51% main transient identification but 86.44% total accuracy. The grouping of sub-scenarios achieved a less precise but more accurate result with 92.33% accuracy. In conclusion, fast transient identification for VVER type reactors was achieved with two-steps approach.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":8006,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Nuclear Energy","volume":"226 ","pages":"Article 111908"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Nuclear Energy","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S030645492500725X","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NUCLEAR SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Nuclear reactors carry significant risks of severe consequences in the event of accidents. Therefore, the imperative of ensuring their safe operation is paramount. During transient conditions, key parameter time series may fluctuate in ways that are not immediately visible. Therefore, the detection of these transients is essential for preventive measures and protective actions. This work focuses on identification of 53 transient sub-scenarios derived from reactivity insertion via rod withdrawal, steam leak from pressurizer, loss of flow and loss of coolant accidents affecting both hot and cold legs main transient for VVER type reactor. 91 features have been handled for model assessment with 465,465 data points. K-Nearest Neighbor, Decision Tree Classifier, Random Forest Classifier, Gradient Boosting, Logistic Regression, Support Vector Machine, Naïve Bayes and Multilayer Perceptron methods were applied for three different approaches. A one-step, two-steps, and grouped one-step approaches were considered for identification sub-scenarios. In the one-step approach, the exact sub-scenario (e.g. 25% rod withdrawal) was identified. In the two steps approach, the main transients (e.g. rod withdrawal) were identified first and then the sub-scenario (e.g. 25% rod withdrawal) were identified. In the grouped one-step approach, sub-scenarios were grouped (e.g. 20 to 30% rod withdrawal) to increase the accuracy of predictions. While the highest accuracy in one-step approach was 74.66%, two-steps approach had 99.51% main transient identification but 86.44% total accuracy. The grouping of sub-scenarios achieved a less precise but more accurate result with 92.33% accuracy. In conclusion, fast transient identification for VVER type reactors was achieved with two-steps approach.
期刊介绍:
Annals of Nuclear Energy provides an international medium for the communication of original research, ideas and developments in all areas of the field of nuclear energy science and technology. Its scope embraces nuclear fuel reserves, fuel cycles and cost, materials, processing, system and component technology (fission only), design and optimization, direct conversion of nuclear energy sources, environmental control, reactor physics, heat transfer and fluid dynamics, structural analysis, fuel management, future developments, nuclear fuel and safety, nuclear aerosol, neutron physics, computer technology (both software and hardware), risk assessment, radioactive waste disposal and reactor thermal hydraulics. Papers submitted to Annals need to demonstrate a clear link to nuclear power generation/nuclear engineering. Papers which deal with pure nuclear physics, pure health physics, imaging, or attenuation and shielding properties of concretes and various geological materials are not within the scope of the journal. Also, papers that deal with policy or economics are not within the scope of the journal.