Guangyun Min , Xiuzhong Shen , Jingtao Xue , Laishun Wang , Naibin Jiang
{"title":"Data-fusion-based variable-fidelity reduced-order model for accurate thermal–hydraulic behavior prediction in a 6 × 6 rod bundle","authors":"Guangyun Min , Xiuzhong Shen , Jingtao Xue , Laishun Wang , Naibin Jiang","doi":"10.1016/j.anucene.2025.111905","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Achieving fast and low-cost computation of the thermal–hydraulic flow field inside a nuclear reactor is of great significance for understanding the reactor’s thermal–hydraulic characteristics and ensuring its operational safety. In this study, a variable-fidelity reduced-order model (ROM) is proposed, which integrates data from both low-fidelity and high-fidelity simulations. The low-fidelity model—characterized by a coarse mesh, standard <em>k</em>-<em>ε</em> turbulence model, Semi-Implicit Method for Pressure Linked Equations (SIMPLE) algorithm, and first-order upwind scheme—is employed to capture the global trend of the flow field of a 6 × 6 rod bundle. Due to its low computational cost, a large number of low-fidelity samples can be generated efficiently. In contrast, the high-fidelity model—using a refined mesh, SST <em>k</em>-<em>ω</em> turbulence model, coupled solver, and second-order upwind scheme—is utilized to correct the flow fields obtained from the low-fidelity model. However, the high computational cost limits the number of high-fidelity samples. To bridge the fidelity gap, a bridge function is constructed to fuse the data from both fidelities. Proper Orthogonal Decomposition (POD) is applied to extract POD modes and corresponding POD coefficients from both low-fidelity and high-fidelity snapshots. The difference between the POD coefficients of the two fidelities is modeled as a function of the input design variables using a Radial Basis Function (RBF) surrogate. For any new design variables, the differences in POD coefficients can be rapidly predicted and added to the corresponding low-fidelity POD coefficients. These corrected POD coefficients are then combined with the high-fidelity POD modes to predict the flow fields. Compared to conventional ROMs, the proposed data-fusion-based variable-fidelity model offers improved computational efficiency and prediction accuracy. The results of this study contribute to the efficient and accurate thermal–hydraulic analysis and optimization design of nuclear reactors.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":8006,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Nuclear Energy","volume":"226 ","pages":"Article 111905"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Nuclear Energy","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0306454925007224","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NUCLEAR SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Achieving fast and low-cost computation of the thermal–hydraulic flow field inside a nuclear reactor is of great significance for understanding the reactor’s thermal–hydraulic characteristics and ensuring its operational safety. In this study, a variable-fidelity reduced-order model (ROM) is proposed, which integrates data from both low-fidelity and high-fidelity simulations. The low-fidelity model—characterized by a coarse mesh, standard k-ε turbulence model, Semi-Implicit Method for Pressure Linked Equations (SIMPLE) algorithm, and first-order upwind scheme—is employed to capture the global trend of the flow field of a 6 × 6 rod bundle. Due to its low computational cost, a large number of low-fidelity samples can be generated efficiently. In contrast, the high-fidelity model—using a refined mesh, SST k-ω turbulence model, coupled solver, and second-order upwind scheme—is utilized to correct the flow fields obtained from the low-fidelity model. However, the high computational cost limits the number of high-fidelity samples. To bridge the fidelity gap, a bridge function is constructed to fuse the data from both fidelities. Proper Orthogonal Decomposition (POD) is applied to extract POD modes and corresponding POD coefficients from both low-fidelity and high-fidelity snapshots. The difference between the POD coefficients of the two fidelities is modeled as a function of the input design variables using a Radial Basis Function (RBF) surrogate. For any new design variables, the differences in POD coefficients can be rapidly predicted and added to the corresponding low-fidelity POD coefficients. These corrected POD coefficients are then combined with the high-fidelity POD modes to predict the flow fields. Compared to conventional ROMs, the proposed data-fusion-based variable-fidelity model offers improved computational efficiency and prediction accuracy. The results of this study contribute to the efficient and accurate thermal–hydraulic analysis and optimization design of nuclear reactors.
期刊介绍:
Annals of Nuclear Energy provides an international medium for the communication of original research, ideas and developments in all areas of the field of nuclear energy science and technology. Its scope embraces nuclear fuel reserves, fuel cycles and cost, materials, processing, system and component technology (fission only), design and optimization, direct conversion of nuclear energy sources, environmental control, reactor physics, heat transfer and fluid dynamics, structural analysis, fuel management, future developments, nuclear fuel and safety, nuclear aerosol, neutron physics, computer technology (both software and hardware), risk assessment, radioactive waste disposal and reactor thermal hydraulics. Papers submitted to Annals need to demonstrate a clear link to nuclear power generation/nuclear engineering. Papers which deal with pure nuclear physics, pure health physics, imaging, or attenuation and shielding properties of concretes and various geological materials are not within the scope of the journal. Also, papers that deal with policy or economics are not within the scope of the journal.