Can Digital Smart Workflows in a Hospital Free Staff from Documentation and Administrative Work?

Jörg Hassmann, Saskia Kröner, Lara Niemöller, Liling Wu, Ursula Hübner
{"title":"Can Digital Smart Workflows in a Hospital Free Staff from Documentation and Administrative Work?","authors":"Jörg Hassmann, Saskia Kröner, Lara Niemöller, Liling Wu, Ursula Hübner","doi":"10.3233/SHTI251509","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study investigates the impact of implementing smart, digitally supported workflows on administrative efficiency in a large German hospital network through the ScanProCare! project. The primary aim was to assess whether the introduction of standardized digital processes leads to measurable time savings across different clinical departments. A longitudinal evaluation design was employed, comparing pre- and post-implementation data. The study focused on quantifying changes in process frequency and duration in operating rooms (ORs), intensive care units (ICUs), and normal wards. Results demonstrated time reductions in several areas: OR documentation decreased by 9.09% (582 hours/year), with implant and material documentation reduced by 65% and 50%. Material request times halved, saving 2,720 hours annually, while normal wards saw the largest savings-9,235 hours for documentation and 5,804 for requests. Some tasks became more time-consuming or were unchanged. incomplete master data, and ongoing training needs limited full benefits, highlighting the importance of continuous system refinement and user support. The study concludes that while digital workflows can enhance operational efficiency, continuous system refinement and user support are crucial to maximizing benefits.</p>","PeriodicalId":94357,"journal":{"name":"Studies in health technology and informatics","volume":"332 ","pages":"123-127"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Studies in health technology and informatics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3233/SHTI251509","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study investigates the impact of implementing smart, digitally supported workflows on administrative efficiency in a large German hospital network through the ScanProCare! project. The primary aim was to assess whether the introduction of standardized digital processes leads to measurable time savings across different clinical departments. A longitudinal evaluation design was employed, comparing pre- and post-implementation data. The study focused on quantifying changes in process frequency and duration in operating rooms (ORs), intensive care units (ICUs), and normal wards. Results demonstrated time reductions in several areas: OR documentation decreased by 9.09% (582 hours/year), with implant and material documentation reduced by 65% and 50%. Material request times halved, saving 2,720 hours annually, while normal wards saw the largest savings-9,235 hours for documentation and 5,804 for requests. Some tasks became more time-consuming or were unchanged. incomplete master data, and ongoing training needs limited full benefits, highlighting the importance of continuous system refinement and user support. The study concludes that while digital workflows can enhance operational efficiency, continuous system refinement and user support are crucial to maximizing benefits.

医院的数字化智能工作流程能让员工从文件和行政工作中解脱出来吗?
本研究调查了在德国一家大型医院网络中,通过ScanProCare!项目。主要目的是评估标准化数字流程的引入是否会在不同临床部门之间节省可衡量的时间。采用纵向评价设计,比较实施前后的数据。该研究的重点是量化手术室(ORs)、重症监护病房(ICUs)和普通病房处理频率和持续时间的变化。结果表明,在几个方面减少了时间:手术室记录减少了9.09%(582小时/年),植入物和材料记录减少了65%和50%。材料申请时间减半,每年节省2720小时,而普通病房节省的时间最多——9235小时用于文件处理,5804小时用于申请。有些任务变得更加耗时,或者没有改变。不完整的主数据和正在进行的培训需要有限的充分利益,突出了持续的系统改进和用户支持的重要性。该研究得出结论,虽然数字化工作流程可以提高运营效率,但持续的系统改进和用户支持对于最大化效益至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信