Trust in Artificial Intelligence in Wound Care: Perspectives of Healthcare Professionals and Patients in Germany.

Birgit Babitsch, Niels Hannemann, Ursula Hübner
{"title":"Trust in Artificial Intelligence in Wound Care: Perspectives of Healthcare Professionals and Patients in Germany.","authors":"Birgit Babitsch, Niels Hannemann, Ursula Hübner","doi":"10.3233/SHTI251514","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Artificial intelligence (AI) is increasingly integrated into healthcare, changing processes and structures, and thus the practice of healthcare professionals and potentially the role of patients and the healthcare professional-patient relationship. Beyond high-precision AI algorithms, knowledge of how to evaluate and use AI-based results in everyday healthcare is crucial for high-quality and safe care, and a prerequisite for trust. Therefore, this qualitative study aims to explore 1) the general perception of trust in AI used in healthcare and specifically in wound care, 2) the prerequisites for building trust in AI, and 3) the impact of AI on treatment and healthcare professional-patient relationship, all from the perspective of healthcare professionals and patients. Interviews were conducted in 2022/2023 with healthcare professionals specializing in wound care (N = 12) and in 2023 with patients with chronic wounds (N = 10). The interview guide included questions about digitalization in general and AI in particular, as well as trust and the healthcare professional-patient relationship. Our data revealed a limited understanding of AI principles and evaluation of AI-generated outcomes in both groups. Healthcare professionals recognized the potential of AI to provide data-driven suggestions for diagnosis and therapy, acting as a supportive \"second opinion\". Patients, on the contrary, expressed a preference for their physicians to incorporate AI-generated results into their care, thereby placing their trust in the physician's ability to apply them correctly. Neither group expected significant changes in the healthcare professional-patient relationship. Trust in AI was linked to general trust in digitalization, and healthcare professionals showed greater trust in AI results that were aligned with their existing expertise and were transparently explained. These findings suggest that AI can be a valuable tool for high-quality healthcare, but in-formed use requires meeting key prerequisites, including Explainable AI (XAI) principles and ongoing training.</p>","PeriodicalId":94357,"journal":{"name":"Studies in health technology and informatics","volume":"332 ","pages":"144-148"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Studies in health technology and informatics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3233/SHTI251514","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Artificial intelligence (AI) is increasingly integrated into healthcare, changing processes and structures, and thus the practice of healthcare professionals and potentially the role of patients and the healthcare professional-patient relationship. Beyond high-precision AI algorithms, knowledge of how to evaluate and use AI-based results in everyday healthcare is crucial for high-quality and safe care, and a prerequisite for trust. Therefore, this qualitative study aims to explore 1) the general perception of trust in AI used in healthcare and specifically in wound care, 2) the prerequisites for building trust in AI, and 3) the impact of AI on treatment and healthcare professional-patient relationship, all from the perspective of healthcare professionals and patients. Interviews were conducted in 2022/2023 with healthcare professionals specializing in wound care (N = 12) and in 2023 with patients with chronic wounds (N = 10). The interview guide included questions about digitalization in general and AI in particular, as well as trust and the healthcare professional-patient relationship. Our data revealed a limited understanding of AI principles and evaluation of AI-generated outcomes in both groups. Healthcare professionals recognized the potential of AI to provide data-driven suggestions for diagnosis and therapy, acting as a supportive "second opinion". Patients, on the contrary, expressed a preference for their physicians to incorporate AI-generated results into their care, thereby placing their trust in the physician's ability to apply them correctly. Neither group expected significant changes in the healthcare professional-patient relationship. Trust in AI was linked to general trust in digitalization, and healthcare professionals showed greater trust in AI results that were aligned with their existing expertise and were transparently explained. These findings suggest that AI can be a valuable tool for high-quality healthcare, but in-formed use requires meeting key prerequisites, including Explainable AI (XAI) principles and ongoing training.

对伤口护理中人工智能的信任:德国医疗保健专业人员和患者的观点。
人工智能(AI)越来越多地融入医疗保健,改变流程和结构,从而改变医疗保健专业人员的实践,并可能改变患者的角色和医疗保健专业人员与患者的关系。除了高精度的人工智能算法,了解如何在日常医疗保健中评估和使用基于人工智能的结果对于高质量和安全的医疗至关重要,也是信任的先决条件。因此,本定性研究旨在从医疗保健专业人员和患者的角度,探讨1)人们对医疗保健特别是伤口护理中使用人工智能的信任的普遍看法,2)建立人工智能信任的先决条件,以及3)人工智能对治疗和医疗保健专业人员与患者关系的影响。在2022/2023年对专门从事伤口护理的医疗保健专业人员(N = 12)和慢性伤口患者(N = 10)进行了访谈。访谈指南包括有关数字化的问题,特别是人工智能,以及信任和医疗专业人员与患者的关系。我们的数据显示,两组患者对人工智能原理的理解有限,对人工智能产生的结果的评估也有限。医疗保健专业人员认识到,人工智能有潜力为诊断和治疗提供数据驱动的建议,充当支持性的“第二意见”。相反,患者表示更希望医生将人工智能生成的结果纳入他们的护理中,从而信任医生正确应用这些结果的能力。两组患者均未预期医护人员与患者之间的关系会发生重大变化。对人工智能的信任与对数字化的普遍信任有关,医疗保健专业人员对与他们现有专业知识一致且解释透明的人工智能结果表现出更大的信任。这些发现表明,人工智能可以成为高质量医疗保健的宝贵工具,但知情使用需要满足关键先决条件,包括可解释的人工智能(XAI)原则和持续培训。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信