Early reintervention improves outcomes in patients with stroke after carotid endarterectomy: observational study.

Igor Koncar, Aleksandar Mitrović, David Matejevic, Aleksa Jovanovic, Nikola Ilic, Marko Dragas, Lazar Davidovic
{"title":"Early reintervention improves outcomes in patients with stroke after carotid endarterectomy: observational study.","authors":"Igor Koncar, Aleksandar Mitrović, David Matejevic, Aleksa Jovanovic, Nikola Ilic, Marko Dragas, Lazar Davidovic","doi":"10.23736/S0021-9509.25.13243-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Thrombosis of the reconstructed artery after carotid endarterectomy (CEA) may be cause of the postoperative stroke or transitory ischemic attack (TIA). Secondary procedure with the aim to restore carotid flow is required in order to potentially improve patients' condition. Results of such intervention are scarce in the literature. The aim of this study was to assess the outcomes of early reintervention in patients who developed early neurological complications after CEA.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective cohort study was conducted on 36 patients who underwent urgent reoperation with synthetic graft interposition after CEA due to early postoperative neurological deficits. Patient data, including demographics, comorbidities, neurological scores, and surgical details, were collected. Post-revision outcomes were evaluated using the Rankin and NIHSS scores. Patients with intraoperative stroke or those with postoperative stroke who were not operated were excluded from the study. Statistical analyses were performed using McNemar's chi-square and Wilcoxon's signed-rank tests, with multivariate analysis to assess predictive factors for recovery.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Out of 36 patients, 94.44% experienced neurological improvement after reoperation. The median Rankin score decreased from 2 to 1 (P<0.001), and the median NIHSS score decreased from 10 to 4 (P<0.001). Significant improvement was observed in arm, leg, and speech deficits, though in patients with consciousness impairments limited recovery was noted. Higher pre-revision Rankin scores and the presence of exulcerated plaques on primary procedure were predictive of poorer outcomes.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Detect of early postoperative neurological deficit after CEA is very important. This study showed significant clinical improvement in most patients reoperated immediately with synthetic graft interposition. Further comparison of other potential strategies, including conservative therapy, might bring more data on how to deal with such a difficult complication.</p>","PeriodicalId":101333,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of cardiovascular surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of cardiovascular surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23736/S0021-9509.25.13243-6","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Thrombosis of the reconstructed artery after carotid endarterectomy (CEA) may be cause of the postoperative stroke or transitory ischemic attack (TIA). Secondary procedure with the aim to restore carotid flow is required in order to potentially improve patients' condition. Results of such intervention are scarce in the literature. The aim of this study was to assess the outcomes of early reintervention in patients who developed early neurological complications after CEA.

Methods: A retrospective cohort study was conducted on 36 patients who underwent urgent reoperation with synthetic graft interposition after CEA due to early postoperative neurological deficits. Patient data, including demographics, comorbidities, neurological scores, and surgical details, were collected. Post-revision outcomes were evaluated using the Rankin and NIHSS scores. Patients with intraoperative stroke or those with postoperative stroke who were not operated were excluded from the study. Statistical analyses were performed using McNemar's chi-square and Wilcoxon's signed-rank tests, with multivariate analysis to assess predictive factors for recovery.

Results: Out of 36 patients, 94.44% experienced neurological improvement after reoperation. The median Rankin score decreased from 2 to 1 (P<0.001), and the median NIHSS score decreased from 10 to 4 (P<0.001). Significant improvement was observed in arm, leg, and speech deficits, though in patients with consciousness impairments limited recovery was noted. Higher pre-revision Rankin scores and the presence of exulcerated plaques on primary procedure were predictive of poorer outcomes.

Conclusions: Detect of early postoperative neurological deficit after CEA is very important. This study showed significant clinical improvement in most patients reoperated immediately with synthetic graft interposition. Further comparison of other potential strategies, including conservative therapy, might bring more data on how to deal with such a difficult complication.

早期再干预可改善颈动脉内膜切除术后卒中患者的预后:观察性研究
背景:颈动脉内膜切除术(CEA)后重建动脉血栓形成可能是术后卒中或短暂性脑缺血发作(TIA)的原因。为了潜在地改善患者的状况,需要进行旨在恢复颈动脉血流的二次手术。这种干预的结果在文献中很少。本研究的目的是评估CEA后出现早期神经系统并发症的患者早期再干预的结果。方法:回顾性队列研究36例因术后早期神经功能缺损而在CEA术后紧急再手术的患者。收集患者资料,包括人口统计学、合并症、神经学评分和手术细节。修订后的结果使用Rankin和NIHSS评分进行评估。术中卒中患者或未手术的术后卒中患者被排除在研究之外。采用McNemar卡方检验和Wilcoxon符号秩检验进行统计分析,并采用多变量分析评估恢复的预测因素。结果:36例患者中,94.44%的患者术后神经功能改善。中位Rankin评分由2分降至1分(p)。结论:CEA术后早期检测神经功能缺损非常重要。本研究显示,大多数患者立即再行人工移植物介入手术后,临床有显著改善。进一步比较其他潜在的策略,包括保守治疗,可能会带来更多关于如何处理这种困难并发症的数据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信